Long-term follow-up of treatment for synthetic mesh complications

Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 126-130

  Hansen, Brooke L ^a   Dunn, Guinn Ellen ^a   Norton, Peggy ^a   Hsu, Yvonne ^a   Nygaard, Ingrid ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Mesh complication; Pelvic organ prolapse; Stress urinary incontinence; Vaginal mesh

Indexed keywords

SLINGS; SURVEYS; UROLOGY;

LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP; MESH COMPLICATION; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; QUALITY OF LIFE; STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCES; TELEPHONE SURVEY; TERTIARY CARES; VAGINAL MESH;

SURGERY;

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD; MESH SLING; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; PELVIC FLOOR DISTRESS INVENTORY SCORE; PELVIS PAIN SYNDROME; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; SEXUAL ABSTINENCE; SPOTTING; SURGICAL MESH; SYNTHETIC VAGINAL MESH; VAGINA BLEEDING; VAGINA DISCHARGE; CHRONIC PAIN; FOREIGN BODIES; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PELVIC PAIN; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; SUBURETHRAL SLING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS; URINARY RETENTION; UTERINE HEMORRHAGE; VAGINAL DISCHARGE;

CHRONIC PAIN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FOREIGN BODIES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PELVIC PAIN; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; SUBURETHRAL SLINGS; SURGICAL MESH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS; URINARY RETENTION; UTERINE HEMORRHAGE; VAGINAL DISCHARGE;

EID: 84900419859     PISSN: 21518378     EISSN: 21544212     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000084     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Maher C, Feiner B, BaesslerK, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 4: CD004014.
2. Ogah J, Cody DJ, Rogerson L. Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women: a short version Cochrane review. Neurourol Urodyn 2011; 30(3): 284-291.
3. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89(4): 501-506.
4. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Public Health Notification: Serious Complications Associated With Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh in Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence. Silver Spring, MD: FDA; 2008. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ AlertsandNotices/PublicHealthNotifications/ucm061976.htm. Accessed August 28, 2013.
5. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Safety Communication: UPDATE on Serious Complications Associated With Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Silver Spring, MD: FDA; 2011. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm262435.htm. Accessed August 28, 2013.
6. Abed H, Rahn DD, Lowenstein L, et al. Incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 2011; 22(7): 789-798.
7. Jonsson Funk M, Visco AG, Weidner AC, et al. Long-term outcomes of vaginal mesh versus native tissue repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2013; 24: 1279-1285.
8. Lee D, Dillon B, LemackG, et al. Transvaginal mesh kitsVhow ''serious'' are the complications and are they reversible? Urology 2013; 81(1): 43-48.
9. BarberMD, WaltersMD, Bump RC. Shortforms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 103-113.
10. The EuroQol Group. EuroQolVa new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16(3): 199-208.
11. Dunn GE, Hansen BL, Egger MJ, et al. Changed women: the long-term impact of vaginal mesh complications. Fem Pelvic Med 2014.
12. Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ. US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care 2005; 43(3): 203-220.
13. Calculating the U.S. Population-Based EQ-5Di Index Score. August 2005. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/rice/EQ5Dscore.htm. Accessed August 28, 2013.
14. Kirby AC, Nager CW. Indications, contraindications, and complications of mesh in the surgical treatment of urinary incontinence. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2013; 56(2): 257-275.
15. Fryback DG, Dunham NC, Palta M, et al. US norms for six generic health-related quality-of-life indexes from the National Health Measurement study. Med Care 2007; 45(12): 1162-1170.
16. Kind P, Hardman G, Macran S. UK Population Norms for EQ-5D. University of York Centre for Health Economics Discussion Paper 172. 1999. Available at: http://www.york.ac.uk/media/che/documents/papers/discussionpapers/ CHE%20Discussion% 20Paper%20172.pdf. Accessed January 28, 2014.
17. Rostaminia G, Shobeiri A, Quiroz LH, et al. Referral pattern for vaginal mesh and graft complications to the University of Oklahoma Pelvic and Bladder Health Clinic. J Okla StateMed Assoc 2012; 105(9): 356-358.
18. Blaivas JG, Purohit RS, Weinberger JM, et al. Salvage surgery after failed treatment of synthetic mesh sling complications. J Urol 2013; 190: 1281-1286.
19. Nguyen JN, Jakus-Waldman SM, Walter AJ, et al. Perioperative complications and reoperations after incontinence and prolapse surgeries using prosthetic implants. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119(3): 539-546.
20. Chermansky CJ, Winters JC. Complications of vaginal mesh surgery. Curr Opin Urol 2012; 22(4): 287-291.
21. El-Nashar SA, Kim-Fine S, Trabuco EC. Early and complete excision of vaginally placed synthetic mesh. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2013; 19(3): 186-187.