Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women: A short version cochrane review

Neurourology and Urodynamics

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 284-291

  Ogah, J ^a   Cody, D J ^b   Rogerson, L ^c  

^a LEEDS TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^c ST JAMES S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cochrane review; Minimally invasive slings; Stress incontinence; Surgery

Indexed keywords

COLPOSUSPENSION; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; REVIEW; STRESS INCONTINENCE; SUBURETHRAL SLING; URINARY DYSFUNCTION;

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SUBURETHRAL SLINGS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS; URODYNAMICS; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 79952773362     PISSN: 07332467     EISSN: 15206777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nau.20980     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Lapitan MC, Cody JD, Grant AM, et al. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence inwomen. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; Issue 2. Art. No.: CD002912. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002912.pub3.
2. Dean NM, Ellis G, Wilson PD, et al. Leparascopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; Issue 3. Art. No.: CD002239. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002239.pub2.
3. Glazener CMA, Cooper K. Anterior vaginal repair for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; Issue 1. Art No.: CD001755. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001755.
4. Bezerra CCB, Bruschini H, Cody JD. Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence inwomen. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; Issue 3. Art No.: CD001754. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001754.pub2.
5. Glazener CMA, Cooper K. Bladder neck needle suspension for urinary incontinence inwomen. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; Issue 1. ArtNo.: CD003636. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003636.pub2.
6. Pickard R, Reaper J, Wyness L, et al. Periurethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; Issue 2. Art No.: CD001405. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001405.
7. Keegan PE, Atiemo K, Cody J, et al. Periurethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; Issue 3. Art No.: CD003881. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003881.pub2.
8. Ogah J, Cody JD, Rogerson L. Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; Issue 4. Art. No.: CD006375. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub2.
9. Ulmsten U. An ambulatory surgical procedure for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1995;29:75-82.
10. Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, et al. An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 1996;7:81-5.
11. Smith ARB, Daneshgari F, Dmochowski R, et al. Surgical treatment of incontinence in women. In: Incontinence. 2nd International Consultation on Incontinence Plymouth, UK: Health Publication Ltd, 2002;
12. Amaro JL, Yamamoto HA, Kawano PR, et al. A prospective randomized trial of autologous fascial sling (AFS) versus tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) for treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). J Urol 2007;177:482. [MEDLINE: 23764].
13. Arunkalaivanan AS, Barrington JW. Randomized trial of porcine dermal sling (Pelvicol™ implant) vs tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) in the surgical treatment of stress incontinence: a questionnaire-based study. Int Urogynecol J 2003;14:17-23. [MEDLINE: 16033].
14. Bai SW, Sohn WH, Chung DJ, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of Burch colpo-suspension, pubovaginal sling, and tension-free vaginal tape for stress urinary incontinence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005;91:246-51. [MEDLINE: 21260].
15. Basok EK, Yildirim A, Atsu N, et al. Cadaveric fascia lata versus intravaginal slingplasty for the pubovaginal sling: surgical outcome, overall success and patient satisfaction rates. Urol Int 2008;80:46-51.
16. Kondo A, Isobe Y, Kimura K, et al. Efficacy, safety and hospital costs of tensionfree vaginal tape and pubovaginal sling in the surgical treatment of stress incontinence. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2006;32:539-44. [MEDLINE: 22233].
17. Lucas M, Emery S, Alan W, et al. Failure of porcine xenograft sling in a randomised controlled trial of three slingmaterials in surgery for stress incontinence (Abstract). In: Proceedings of the International Continence Society (34th Annual Meeting) and the International Urogynecological Association, 23-27 Aug, 2004, Paris. 2004:Abstract number 309. [MEDLINE: 19056].
18. Song YF, Huang HJ, Xu B, et al. Comparative study of tension-free vaginal tape and fascia lata for stress urinary incontinence [Chinese]. Chung-Hua Fu Chan Ko Tsa Chih [Chin J Obstet Gynecol] 2004;39:658-61. [MEDLINE: 20768].
19. Wadie BS, Edwan A, Nabeeh AM. Autologous fascial sling vs polypropylene tape at short-term followup: a prospective randomized study. J Urol 2005;174:990-3. [MEDLINE: 20796].
20. Silva-Filho AL, Candido EB, Noronha A, et al. Comparative study of autologous pubovaginal sling and synthetic transobturator (TOT) SAFYRE sling in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2006;273:288-92. [MEDLINE: 21600].
21. Drahoradova P, Masata J, Martan A, et al. Comparative development of quality of life between TVT and Burch colposuspension (Abstract). In: Proceedings of the International Continence Society (34th Annual Meeting) and the International Urogynecological Association, 23-27 Aug, 2004, Paris. 2004:Abstract number 278. [MEDLINE: 19049].
22. El-Barky E, El Shazly A, El Wahab OA, et al. Tension free vaginal tape versus Burch colposuspension for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urol Nephrol 2005;37:277-81. [MEDLINE: 20774].
23. Han WHC. Burch colposuspension or tension-free vaginal tape for female urinary incontinence? (Abstract). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001;12:S23.
24. Koelbl H, Halaska M, Ostermann S, et al. Burch colposuspension and TVT-perioperative results of a prospective randomized trial in patients with genuine stress incontinence (Abstract). Neurourol Urodyn 2002;21:327. [MEDLINE: 14541].
25. Liapis A, Bakas P, Creatsas G. Burch colposuspension and tension-free vaginal tape in the management of stress urinary incontinence in women. Eur Urol 2002;41:469-73. [MEDLINE: 14229].
26. Sivaslioglu AA, Caliskan E, Dolen I, et al. A randomised comparison of transobturator tape and Burch colposuspension in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 2007;18:1015-9. (Pubitemid 350130404)
27. Wang AC, Chen MC. Comparison of tension-free vaginal taping versus modified Burch colposuspension on urethral obstruction: a randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn 2003;22:185-90. [MEDLINE: 16021].
28. Ward K, Hilton P, on behalf of the United Kingdom and Ireland Tensionfree Vaginal Tape Trial Group. Prospective multicentre randomised trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension as primary treatment for stress incontinence. BMJ 2002;325:67-73. [MEDLINE: 14365].
29. Adile B, Cucinella G, Gugliotta G, et al. A prospective randomised study of Burch laparoscopy versus tension-free vaginal tape: 2 year follow-up [Italian]. Urogynaecol Int J 2003;15:121-2. [MEDLINE: 13093].
30. Foote AJ, Maughan V, Carne C. Laparoscopic colposuspension versus vaginal suburethral slingplasty: a randomised prospective trial. Austr NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 2006;46:517-20. [MEDLINE: 22592].
31. Maher C, Qatawneh A, Baessler K, et al. Laparoscopic colposuspension or tension-free vaginal tape for recurrent stress urinary incontinence and/or intrinsic sphincter deficiency - a randomised controlled trial (Abstract). Neurourol Urodyn 2004;23:433-4. [MEDLINE: 19005].
32. Persson J, Teleman P, Eten-Bergquist C, et al. Cost-analyses based on a prospective, randomised study comparing laparoscopic colposuspension with tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002;81:1066-73. [MEDLINE: 14362].
33. Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Karram MM, et al. Laparoscopic Burch colposus-pension versus tension-free vaginal tape: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:1249-58. [MEDLINE: 19401].
34. Ustun Y, Engin-Ustun Y, Gungor M, et al. Tension-free vaginal tape compared with laparoscopic Burch urethropexy [Erratum appears in Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 2003; 10:581]. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003;10:386-9. [MEDLINE: 16694].
35. Valpas A, Kivela A, Penttinen J, et al. Tension-free vaginal tape and laparoscopic mesh colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:42-9. [MEDLINE: 19322].
36. Andonian S, Chen T, St Denis B, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing suprapubic arch sling (SPARC) and tension-free vaginal tape (TVT): one-year results. Eur Urol 2005;47:537-41. [MEDLINE: 20378].
37. Kim J, Baek U, Kwon S, et al. The efficacy of Iris procedure in stress urinary incontinence: comparison with TVT and SPARC (Abstract). In: Proceedings of the International Continence Society (34th Annual Meeting) and the International Urogynecological Association, 23-27 Aug, 2004, Paris, 2004: Abstract number 313. [MEDLINE: 19058].
38. Lim YN, Muller R, Corstiaans A, et al. Suburethral slingplasty evaluation study in North Queensland, Australia: the SUSPEND trial. Austr NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;45:52-9. [MEDLINE: 20403].
39. Lord HE, Taylor JD, Finn JC, et al. A randomized controlled equivalence trial of short-term complications and efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape and suprapubic urethral support sling for treating stress incontinence. BJU Int 2006;98:367-76. [MEDLINE: 22369].
40. Tseng LH, Wang AC, Lin YH, et al. Randomized comparison of the suprapubic arc sling procedure vs tension-free vaginal taping for stress incontinent women. Int Urogynecol J 2005;16:230-5. [MEDLINE: 20354].
41. But I, Zegura B, Pakiz M, et al. Outside-in vs inside-out transobturator approach in women with stress and mixed urinary incontinence: a prospective randomised head-to-head comparison study (Abstract No. 018). Int Urogynecol J 2007;18:S11-2.
42. Houwert M, Vos MC, Vervest HAM. Transobturator tape (TOT), inside-out versus outside-in approaches: outcome after 1 year (Abstract no. 056). Int Urogynecol J 2007;18:S33.
43. Lee K-S, Choo M-S, Lee YS, et al. Prospective comparison of the 'inside-out' and 'outside-in' transobturator tape procedures for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008;19:577-82.
44. Liapis A, Bakas P, Creatsas G. Monarc vs TVT-O for the treatment of primary stress incontinence: a randomised study. Int Urogynecol J 2008;19:185-90.
45. Meschia M, Pifarotti P, Bernasconi F, et al. Tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) and intravaginal slingplasty (IVS) for stress urinary incontinence: a multicenter randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:1338-42. [MEDLINE: 22268].
46. Rechberger T, Rzezniczuk K, Skorupski P, et al. A randomized comparison between monofilament and multifilament tapes for stress incontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J 2003;14:432-6. [MEDLINE: 16673].
47. Andonian S, St-Denis B, Lemieux MC, et al. Prospective clinical trial comparing Obtape and DUPS to TVT: one-year safety and efficacy results. Eur Urol 2007;52:245-5.
48. Araco F, Gravante G, Sorge R, et al. TVT-O vs TVT: a randomized trial in patients with different degrees of urinary stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 2008;19:917-26. (Pubitemid 351772622)
49. Barber M, Kleeman S, Karram M, et al. A multi-center randomized trial comparing the transobturator tape with tension-free vaginal tape for the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence (Abstract number 113). Neurourol Urodyn 2007;26:742-3. [MEDLINE: 23758].
50. Barry C, Lim YN, Muller R, et al. Amulti-centre, randomised clinical control trial comparing the retropubic (RP) approach versus the transobturator approach (TO) for tension-free, suburethral sling treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence: the TORP study. Int Urogynecol J 2008;19:171-8.
51. Cervigni M, Natale F, La Penna C, et al. Surgical correction of stress urinary incontinence associated with pelvic organ prolapse: trans-obturator approach (MONARC) versus retropubic approach (TVT) (Abstract number 36). Neurourol Urodyn 2006;25:552. [MEDLINE: 23756].
52. Darai E, Frobert JL, Grisard-Anaf M, et al. Functional results after the suburethral sling procedure for urinary stress incontinence: a prospective randomizedmulticentre study comparing the retropubic and transobturator routes. Eur Urol 2007;51:795-802. [MEDLINE: 22550].
53. Deffieux X, Daher N, Mansoor A, et al. Tension free vaginal tape (TVT) and transobturator suburethral tape from inside to outside (TVT-O) for surgical treatment of female urinary incontinence: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (Abstract no. 033). Int Urogynecol J 2007;18:S19-20.
54. Enzelsberger H, Schalu J, Heider R, et al. TVT versus TOT - a prospective randomized study for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence at a follow-up of 1 year [German]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2005;65:506-11. [MEDLINE: 21007].
55. Kim Y-W, Na Y-G, Sul C-K. Randomized prospective study between pubovaginal sling using SPARC sling system and MONARC sling system for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: short term results. Korean J Urol 2005;46:1078-82. [MEDLINE: 22116].
56. Lee KS, Han DH, Choi YS, et al. A prospective trial comparing tension-free vaginal tape and transobturator vaginal tape inside-out for the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow up. J Urol 2007;177:214-8. (Pubitemid 44879472)
57. Liapis A, Bakas P, Giner M, et al. Tension-free vaginal tape versus tension-free vaginal tape obturator in women with stress urinary incontinence. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2006;62:160-4. [MEDLINE: 22245].
58. Mansoor A, Vedrine N, Darcq C. Surgery of female urinary incontinence using transobturator tape (TOT): a prospective randomised comparative study with TVT (Abstract). Neurourol Urodyn 2003;22:488-9. [MEDLINE: 17107].
59. Meschia M, Bertozzi R, Pifarotti P, et al. Peri-operative morbidity and early results of a randomised trial comparing TVT and TVT-O. Int Urogynecol J 2007;18:1257-61. (Pubitemid 47521467)
60. Oliveira LM, Girao MJBC, Sartori MGF, et al. Comparison of retro pubic TVT, pre pubic TVT and TVT obturator in surgical treatment of women with stress urinary incontinence (Abstract no. 354). Int Urogynecol J 2006;17:S253.
61. Porena M, Costantini E, Frea B, et al. Tension-free vaginal tape versus transobturator tape as surgery for stress urinary incontinence: results of amulticentre randomised trial. Eur Urol 2007;52:1481-91. (Pubitemid 47445985)
62. Rechberger T, Jankiewicz K, Skorupski P, et al. Transobturator vs retropubic vaginal tape for female stress urinary incontinence: one year follow-up in 296 patients (Abstract number 288). In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the International Continence Society (ICS), 20-24 Aug, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 2007. [MEDLINE: 23763].
63. Rinne K, Laurikainen E, Kivela A, et al. A randomized trial comparing TVT with TVT-O: 12-month results. Int Urogynecol J 2008;19:1049-54.
64. Riva D, Sacca V, Tonta A, et al. TVT versus TOT A randomised study at 1 year follow up (Abstract). Int Urogynecol J 2006;17:S060.
65. Schierlitz LHE, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, et al. A randomised controlled study to compare tension free vaginal tape (TVT) and Monarc transobturator tape in the treatment of women with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) and intrinsic sphincter deficiency (Abstract no. 032). Int Urogynecol J 2007;18:S19. [MEDLINE: 23759].
66. Teo R, Moran P, Mayne C, et al. Randomised trial of tension-free vaginal tape and transobturator tape for the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence in women (Abstract number 283). In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the International Continence Society (ICS), 20-24 Aug, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 2007. [MEDLINE: 23761].
67. Wang AC, Lin YH, Tseng LH, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of transobturator suburethral sling (Monarc) vs suprapubic arc (Sparc) sling procedures for female urodynamic stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 2006;17:439-43. [MEDLINE: 22217].
68. Zhu L, Lang J, Hai N, et al. Comparing vaginal tape and transobturator tape for the treatment of mild and moderate stress incontinence: a prospective randomized controlled study. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2007;99:14-7. (Pubitemid 47348000)
69. Zullo MA, Plotti F, Calcagno M, et al. One-year follow-up of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) and trans-obturator suburethral tape from inside to outside (TVT-O) for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a prospective randomised trial. Eur Urol 2007;51:1376-82, discussion 1383-4. [MEDLINE: 23246].
70. Tamussino KF, Hanzal E, Kölle D, et al. Tension-free vaginal tape operation: results of the Austrian registry. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98(5 Pt 1):732-6. (Pubitemid 33042537)
71. Kuuva N, Nilsson CG. A nationwide analysis of complications associated with the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002;81:72-7. (Pubitemid 34208371)
72. Schraffordt Koops SE, Bisseling TM, Heintz AP, et al. Prospective analysis of complications of tension-free vaginal tape from The Netherlands Tension-free Vaginal Tape study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:45-52. (Pubitemid 40991824)
73. Tamussino K, Hanzal E, Kölle D, et al. Transobturator tapes for stress urinary incontinence: Results of the Austrian registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:3-11.
74. Collinet P, Ciofu C, Costa P, et al. The safety of the inside-out transobturator approach for transvaginal tape (TVT-O) treatment in stress urinary incontinence: French registry data on 984 women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008;19:711-5. (Pubitemid 351516950)