Long-term outcomes of vaginalmesh versus native tissue repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse

International Urogynecology Journal

Volumn 24, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1279-1285

  Funk, Michele Jonsson ^a,b   Visco, Anthony G ^c   Weidner, Alison C ^c   Pate, Virginia ^a   Wu, Jennifer M ^c,d  

^a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Anterior colporrhaphy; Pelvic organ prolapse; Recurrent prolapse; Surgery; Vaginal mesh

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DEVICE REMOVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECURRENT DISEASE; REOPERATION; SUBURETHRAL SLING; VAGINA RECONSTRUCTION; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MIDDLE AGED; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RECURRENCE; REOPERATION; RISK FACTORS; SURGICAL MESH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE PROLAPSE; VAGINA; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84889245503     PISSN: 09373462     EISSN: 14333023     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-013-2043-9     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. FDA Safety Communication: Update on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Issued on 13 July 2011. http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/safety/alertsandnotices/ucm262435. htm. Accessed on 12 June 2012
2. Dangerous medical devices: Most medical implants have never been tested for safety. Consumer Reports Magazine, May 2012. Accessed on 9 July 2012 at: Http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/magazine/2012/04/cr-investigates-dangerous- medical-devices/index.htm
3. FDA Executive Summary: Surgical mesh for the treatment of women with pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence, 8-9 September 2011. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/ MedicalDevices/MedicalDevices AdvisoryCommittee/ObstetricsandGynecologyDevices/ UCM2 70402.pdf. Accessed on 12 June 2012
4. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89(4):501-506
5. Altman D, Vayrynen T, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Falconer C (2011) Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse. N Engl J Med 364(19):1826-1836
6. Nieminen K, Hiltunen R, Takala T et al (2010) Outcomes after anterior vaginal wall repair with mesh: A randomized, controlled trial with a 3 year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(3):235 e1-e8
7. Foon R, Toozs-Hobson P, Latthe PM (2008) Adjuvant materials in anterior vaginal wall prolapse surgery: A systematic review of effectiveness and complications. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(12):1697-1706
8. Jia X, Glazener C, Mowatt G et al (2008) Efficacy and safety of using mesh or grafts in surgery for anterior and/or posterior vaginal wall prolapse: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 115(11):1350-1361
9. Nguyen JN, Burchette RJ (2008) Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 111(4):891-898
10. Thomson Reuters MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters Database, 2000-2009. Source: RED BOOK® and Market- Scan® are registered trademarks of Thomson Reuters (Healthcare) Inc. http://thomsonreuters.com/ products-services/healthcare/healthcare-products/pharmaceuticals/mktscan-res-db/ . Accessed on 12 June 2012
11. DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor BD, Smith JC (2011) US Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, P60-239, Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2010. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/p60-239.pdf. Accessed on 24 June 2012
12. Menefee SA, DyerKY, Lukacz ES, Simsiman AJ, LuberKM, Nguyen JN (2011) Colporrhaphy compared with mesh or graft-reinforced vaginal paravaginal repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 118(6):1337-1344
13. Withagen MI, Milani AL, den Boon J, Vervest HA, Vierhout ME (2011) Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 117(2 Pt 1):242-250
14. Maher CM, Feiner B, Baessler K, Glazener CM (2011) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: The updated summary version Cochrane review. Int Urogynecol J 22(11):1445-1457
15. Sung VW, Rogers RG, Schaffer JI et al (2008) Graft use in transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair: A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 112(5):1131-1142
16. Hiltunen R, Nieminen K, Takala T et al (2007) Low-weight polypropylene mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 110(2 Pt 2):455-462
17. Carey M, Higgs P, Goh J et al (2009) Vaginal repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy for prolapse: A randomised controlled trial. BJOG 116(10):1380-1386
18. Lunardelli JL, Auge AP, Lemos NL et al (2009) Polypropylene mesh vs. site-specific repair in the treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse: Preliminary results of a randomized clinical trial. Rev Col Bras Cir 36(3):210-216
19. Nguyen JN, Jakus-Waldman SM,Walter AJ, White T, Menefee SA (2012) Perioperative complications and reoperations after incontinence and prolapse surgeries using prosthetic implants. Obstet Gynecol 119(3):539-546