Ethics overload: Impact of excessive ethical review on comorbidity research

Mental Health and Substance Use: Dual Diagnosis

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 184-194

  Posselt, Miriam ^a   Galletly, Cherrie ^a   De Crespigny, Charlotte ^a   Cairney, Imelda ^a   Moss, John ^a   Liu, Dennis ^a   Francis, Hepsibah ^a   Kelly, Janet ^b   Procter, Nicholas ^c   Banders, Andris ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^d South Australian Network of Drug and Alcohol Services (Non government)   (Australia)

Author keywords

aboriginal; comorbidity; Ethics; mental health; refugee; substance use

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH ETHICS; SUBSTANCE USE;

EID: 84900415131     PISSN: 17523281     EISSN: 17523273     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17523281.2014.880730     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Arshad, A., &, Arkwright, P. (2008). Status of healthcare studies submitted to UK research ethics committees for approval in 2004-5. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34 (5), 393-395. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.020545
2. Bret, P. (1889). First year of scientific knowledge. Retrieved from http:// www.worldcat.org/title/first-year-of-scientific-knowledge/./2306915.
3. Gill, P. S., Plumridge, G., Khunti, K., &, Greenfield, S. (2013). Under-representation of minority ethnic groups in cardiovascular research: A semi-structured interview study. Family Practice, 30 (2), 233-241. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cms054
4. Glasziou, P., &, Chalmers, I. (2004). Ethics review roulette: What can we learn?: That ethics review has costs and one size doesn't fit all. British Medical Journal, 328 (7432), 121 -122. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7432.121
5. Iedema, R. A., Allen, S., Britton, K., &, Hor, S. (2012). Out of the frying pan? Streamlining the ethics review process of multisite qualitative research projects. Australian Health Review, 7 (2), 137-139.
6. Jamrozik, K. (2000). The case for a new system for oversight of research on human subjects. Journal of Medical Ethics, 26 (5), 334-339. doi: 10.1136/jme.26.5.334
7. Jamrozik, K. (2004). Research ethics paperwork: What is the plot we seem to have lost? British Medical Journal, 329 (7460), 286 -287. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7460.286
8. Jones, A. M., &, Bamford, B. (2004). The other face of research governance. British Medical Journal, 329 (7460), 280 -281. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7460.280
9. Lydon, J. (2002). The experimental 1860s: Charles Walter's images of Coranderrk Aboriginal Station, Victoria. Aboriginal History, 27, 78 to 129. Retrieved from epress.anu.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/ch0549.pdf
10. National Health and Medical Research Council. (2007). National statement on ethical conduct in human research. Canberra: Author.
11. National Health and Medical Research Council. (2012). Ethical issues in research into alcohol and other drugs: An issues paper exploring the need for a guidance framework. National Health and Medical Research Council. Retrieved from http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/-files-nhmrc/publications/attachments/ds12-ethical- issues-alcohol-drugs-120625.pdf
12. National Health and Medical Research Council. (2013). National statement on ethical conduct in human research 2007-updated May 2013. Canberra: Author. Retrieved from http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/publications/e72
13. Paniagua, H. (2012). The ethics committee: A facilitator or barrier to research? Practice Nursing, 23 (2), 95-98.
14. Pehboeck, D., Hohlrieder, M., Wenzel, V., &, Benzer, A. (2009). Submission of clinical studies to ethics committees or clinical trials registers: The authors point of view. Intensive Care Medicine, 35 (4), 713-716. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1434-3
15. Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.
16. Warlow, C. (2005). Over-regulation of clinical research: A threat to public health. Clinical Medicine, 5 (1), 33-38. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.5-1-33
17. WHO. (1964). Declaration of Helsinki. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/ bulletin/archives/79(4)373.pdf
18. Zywicki, T. (2007). Institutional review boards as academic bureaucracies: An economic and experiential analysis. Northwestern University Law Review, 101 (2), 861-896.