Research ethics paperwork: What is the plot we seem to have lost?

BMJ

Volumn 329, Issue 7460, 2004, Pages 286-

  Jamrozik, Konrad ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH HAZARD; INFORMED CONSENT; IONIZING RADIATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH ETHICS; REVIEW; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SOCIAL CARE; UNITED KINGDOM;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

DOCUMENTATION; ETHICAL REVIEW; ETHICS COMMITTEES; ETHICS, RESEARCH; RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 4043171955     PISSN: 09598138     EISSN: 14685833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.329.7460.286     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Ah-See KW, MacKenzie J, Thakker NS, Maran AG. Local research ethics committee approval for a national study in Scotland. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1998; 43: 303–305.
2. Dunn NR, Arscott A, Mann RD. Costs of seeking ethics approval before and after the introduction of multicentre research ethics committees. J R Soc Med 2000; 93: 511–512.
3. Al-Shahi R, Warlow CP. Ethical review of a multicentre study in Scotland: a weighty problem. J R Coll Physicians Lond 1999; 33: 549–552.
4. Maskell NA, Jones EL, Davies RJO BTS/MRC MIST steering committee. Variations in experience in obtaining local ethical approval for participation in a multi-centre study. Q J Med 2003; 96: 305–307.
5. Department of Health. Research governance framework for health and social care. London: Department of Health, 2001.
6. Working Group on Ethical Review of Student Research in the NHS. The ethical governance and regulation of student projects: a draft proposal. London: Central Office for Research Ethics Committtees, 2004. www.corec.org.uk/applicants/docs/SPECs_proposal_DRAFT.doc (accessed 29 Jun 2004).
7. Jamrozik K The case for a new system for oversight of research on human subjects. J Med Ethics 2000; 26: 334–339.