Status of healthcare studies submitted to UK research ethics committees for approval in 2004-5

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 393-395

  Arshad, A ^a   Arkwright, P D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b BOOTH HALL CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ECONOMICS; ETHICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD; STATISTICS; UNITED KINGDOM;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC;

EID: 55449089491     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: 14734257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2007.020545     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Central office for research ethics committees. www.corec.org.uk (accessed 18 Jan 2008).
2. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm (accessed 18 Jan 2008).
3. Decullier E, Lheritier V, Chapuis F. Fate of biomedical research protocols and publication bias in France: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2005;331:19.
4. Pick J, Carne X, Arnaiz JA, et al. Role of a research ethics committee in follow-up and publication of results. Lancet 2003;361:1015-16.
5. Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, et al. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 1991;337:867-72.
6. Stern JM, Simes RJ. Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects. BMJ 1997;315:640-5.
7. Dickersin K, Min YI, Meinert CI. Factors influencing publication of research results: follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards. JAMA 1992;267:374-8.
8. Wald DS. Bureaucracy of ethics applications. BMJ 2004;329:282-4.
9. Research Councils UK. Report of the Research Councils UK Efficiency and Effectiveness of Peer Review Project. October 2006. www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/peer/efficiencypr.htm (accessed 18 Jan 2008).
10. Jamrozik K. Research ethics paperwork. What is the plot that we seem to have lost? BMJ 2004;329:286-7.
11. Jones AM, Bamford B. The other face of research governance. BMJ 2004;329:280-1.
12. Ward HJ, Cousens SN, Smith-Bathgate B, et al. Obstacles to conducting epidemiological research in the UK general population. BMJ 2004;329:277-9.
13. Major S. Advisory group to review NHS research ethics committees. BMJ 2004;329:1258.
14. Report of the Ad Hoc Advisory Group on the Operation of NHS Research Ethics Committees. Department of Health. June 2005. www.dh.gov.uk/ PublicationsAndStatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/ PublicationsPolicyAndGuidanceArticle/fs/en?CONTENT_ID=4112416&chk=kw5gAf (accessed 18 Jan 2008).
15. National Patient Safety Agency. Integrated Reseach Application System (IRAS). http://www.nres.npsa.nhs.uk/applicants (accessed 18 Jan 2008).
16. Sackett D. Campaign to revitalise academic medicine. BMJ 2004;329:294.