메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2014, Pages

Blinded by PRISMA: Are systematic reviewers focusing on PRISMA and ignoring other guidelines?

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; KNOWLEDGE BASE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; LITERATURE; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); PUBLISHING; STANDARDS;

EID: 84900317490     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096407     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (73)

References (18)
  • 3
    • 68049122102 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
    • The PRISMA Group
    • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6: e1000097.
    • (2009) PLoS Med , vol.6
    • Moher, D.1    Liberati, A.2    Tetzlaff, J.3    Altman, D.G.4
  • 4
    • 77952274419 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
    • Schulz K, Altman D, Moher D (2010) CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Medicine 8: 18.
    • (2010) BMC Medicine , vol.8 , pp. 18
    • Schulz, K.1    Altman, D.2    Moher, D.3
  • 5
    • 35548966748 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies
    • Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC et al. (2007) Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 335: 806-8. (Pubitemid 350057266)
    • (2007) British Medical Journal , vol.335 , Issue.7624 , pp. 806-808
    • Von Elm, E.1    Egger, M.2    Altman, D.G.3    Pocock, S.J.4    Gotzsche, P.C.5    Vandenbroucke, J.P.6
  • 6
    • 84891306524 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses
    • Panic N, Leoncini E, de Belvis G, Ricciardi W, Boccia S (2013) Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. PLoS One 8: e83138.
    • (2013) PLoS One , vol.8
    • Panic, N.1    Leoncini, E.2    De Belvis, G.3    Ricciardi, W.4    Boccia, S.5
  • 8
    • 81155128334 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • From QUOROM to PRISMA: A survey of high-impact medical journals' instructions to authors and a review of systematic reviews in anaesthesia literature
    • Tao KM, Li XQ, Zhou QH, Moher D, Ling CQ et al. (2011) From QUOROM to PRISMA: a survey of high-impact medical journals' instructions to authors and a review of systematic reviews in anaesthesia literature. PloS One 6: e27611.
    • (2011) PloS One , vol.6
    • Tao, K.M.1    Li, X.Q.2    Zhou, Q.H.3    Moher, D.4    Ling, C.Q.5
  • 9
    • 0033610734 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement
    • Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, et al. (1999) Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Lancet 354: 1896-1900.
    • (1999) Lancet , vol.354 , pp. 1896-1900
    • Moher, D.1    Cook, D.J.2    Eastwood, S.3    Olkin, I.4    Rennie, D.5
  • 11
    • 33847606952 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
    • Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, et al. (2007) Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 15: 7-10.
    • (2007) BMC Med Res Methodol , vol.15 , pp. 7-10
    • Shea, B.J.1    Grimshaw, J.M.2    Wells, G.A.3    Boers, M.4    Andersson, N.5
  • 12
    • 2942700307 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The development of QUADAS: A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews
    • Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J (2003) The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 10: 3-25.
    • (2003) BMC Med Res Methodol , vol.10 , pp. 3-25
    • Whiting, P.1    Rutjes, A.W.2    Reitsma, J.B.3    Bossuyt, P.M.4    Kleijnen, J.5
  • 13
    • 80054740636 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • QUADAS-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies
    • Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, et al. (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155: 529-36.
    • (2011) Ann Intern Med , vol.155 , pp. 529-536
    • Whiting, P.F.1    Rutjes, A.W.2    Westwood, M.E.3    Mallett, S.4    Deeks, J.J.5
  • 14
    • 0037132876 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bias and causal associations in observational research
    • DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07451-2
    • Grimes DA, Schulz KF (2002) Bias and causal associations in observational research. The Lancet 359: 248-252. (Pubitemid 34113828)
    • (2002) Lancet , vol.359 , Issue.9302 , pp. 248-252
    • Grimes, D.A.1    Schulz, K.F.2
  • 16
    • 84867775694 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Problems and limitations in conducting systematic reviews
    • Chapter 3, 2nd edition. Edited by Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG. London
    • Egger M, Dickersin K, Smith GD (2001) Chapter 3, Problems and limitations in conducting systematic reviews. In Systematic reviews in healthcare, BMJ books. 2nd edition. Edited by Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG. London: 43-68.
    • (2001) Systematic Reviews in Healthcare, BMJ Books , pp. 43-68
    • Egger, M.1    Dickersin, K.2    Smith, G.D.3
  • 17
    • 83055181946 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: A systematic review
    • Willis BH, Quigley M (2011) The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 11: 163.
    • (2011) BMC Med Res Methodol , vol.11 , pp. 163
    • Willis, B.H.1    Quigley, M.2
  • 18
    • 84900329471 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • website. Available: Accessed 2014 Jan 10
    • EQUATOR Network website. Available: www.equator-network.org. Accessed 2014 Jan 10.


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.