메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 83, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 158-163

A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews in orthodontics

Author keywords

AMSTAR; Orthodontic; PRISMA; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIBLIOMETRICS; LITERATURE; ORTHODONTICS; PUBLICATION; STANDARD;

EID: 84872047795     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 19457103     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/032612-251.1     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (91)

References (19)
  • 2
    • 33744932484 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Search and selection methodology of systematic reviews in orthodontics (2000-2004
    • Flores-Mir C, Major MP, Major PW. Search and selection methodology of systematic reviews in orthodontics (2000-2004). Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:214-217.
    • (2006) Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. , vol.130 , pp. 214-217
    • Flores-Mir, C.1    Major, M.P.2    Major, P.W.3
  • 3
    • 64149092158 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Survey of systematic review authors in dentistry: Challenges in methodology and reporting
    • Major MP, Warren S, Flores-Mir C. Survey of systematic review authors in dentistry: Challenges in methodology and reporting. J Dent Educ. 2009;73:471-482.
    • (2009) J Dent Educ. , vol.73 , pp. 471-482
    • Major, M.P.1    Warren, S.2    Flores-Mir, C.3
  • 4
    • 0033610734 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement
    • Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. Lancet. 1999;354:1896-1900.
    • (1999) Lancet. , vol.354 , pp. 1896-1900
    • Moher, D.1    Cook, D.J.2    Eastwood, S.3    Olkin, I.4    Rennie, D.5    Stroup, D.F.6
  • 5
    • 69449100622 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: The PRISMA statement
    • for the PG
    • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, for the PG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.
    • (2009) BMJ , vol.339
    • Moher, D.1    Liberati, A.2    Tetzlaff, J.3    Altman, D.G.4
  • 6
    • 68549101842 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic re-views and metaanalyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration
    • Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic re-views and metaanalyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.
    • (2009) BMJ. , vol.339
    • Liberati, A.1    Altman, D.G.2    Tetzlaff, J.3
  • 7
    • 29144494962 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • CONSORT/QUOROM guidelines adopted for reporting randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews [editorial]
    • Turpin DL. CONSORT/QUOROM guidelines adopted for reporting randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews [editorial]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128:681-686.
    • (2005) Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. , vol.128 , pp. 681-686
    • Turpin, D.L.1
  • 8
    • 78651489763 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Updated CONSORT and PRISMA documents now available
    • Turpin DL. Updated CONSORT and PRISMA documents now available. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:721-722.
    • (2010) Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. , vol.137 , pp. 721-722
    • Turpin, D.L.1
  • 9
    • 33847606952 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
    • Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al. Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;15:7-10.
    • (2007) BMC Med Res Methodol. , vol.15 , pp. 7-10
    • Shea, B.J.1    Grimshaw, J.M.2    Wells, G.A.3
  • 10
    • 84865058852 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews in leading orthodontics journals: A quality paradigm?
    • Apr 24, [Epub ahead of print]
    • Fleming PS, Seehra J, Polychronopoulou A, Fedorowicz Z, Pandis N. Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews in leading orthodontics journals: A quality paradigm? Eur J Orthod. 2012 Apr 24, [Epub ahead of print].
    • (2012) Eur J Orthod.
    • Fleming, P.S.1    Seehra, J.2    Polychronopoulou, A.3    Fedorowicz, Z.4    Pandis, N.5
  • 11
    • 79960590570 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics
    • Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA, Athanasiou AE. Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011;14:116-137.
    • (2011) Orthod Craniofac Res. , vol.14 , pp. 116-137
    • Papageorgiou, S.N.1    Papadopoulos, M.A.2    Athanasiou, A.E.3
  • 12
    • 67651024961 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reporting and methodologic quality of Cochrane neonatal review group systematic reviews
    • Al Faleh K, Al-Omran M. Reporting and methodologic quality of Cochrane neonatal review group systematic reviews. BMC Pediatr. 2009;9:38.
    • (2009) BMC Pediatr. , vol.9 , pp. 38
    • Al Faleh, K.1    Al-Omran, M.2
  • 16
    • 78649803490 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Systematic reviews of topical fluorides for dental caries: A review of reporting practice
    • Ijaz M, Croucher RE, Marinho VCC. Systematic reviews of topical fluorides for dental caries: A review of reporting practice. Caries Res. 2010;44:579-592.
    • (2010) Caries Res. , vol.44 , pp. 579-592
    • Ijaz, M.1    Croucher, R.E.2    Marinho, V.C.C.3
  • 17
    • 84872032725 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • PROSPERO: The new international prospective register of systematic reviews
    • Clarke M, Stewart L. PROSPERO: The new international prospective register of systematic reviews. Cochrane Methods. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(suppl 1):1-40.
    • (2011) Cochrane Methods. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. , Issue.SUPPL. 1 , pp. 1-40
    • Clarke, M.1    Stewart, L.2
  • 18
    • 52649129348 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias
    • Dwan K, Altman DG, Arnaiz JA, et al. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(8):e3081.
    • (2008) PLoS ONE. , vol.3 , Issue.8
    • Dwan, K.1    Altman, D.G.2    Arnaiz, J.A.3
  • 19
    • 84872047133 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Cochrane Collaboration Cochrane Reviews Of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. Available at. Accessed March 15, 2012
    • The Cochrane Collaboration, Cochrane reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Available at: Http://srdta.cochrane.org/ cochrane-reviews-diagnostic-test- accuracy-faq. Accessed March 15, 2012.


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.