Accelerometer-determined physical activity and its comparison with the international physical activity questionnaire in a sample of Nigerian adults

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Oyeyemi, Adewale L ^a   Umar, Maimuna ^a   Oguche, Friday ^b   Aliyu, Salamatu U ^a   Oyeyemi, Adetoyeje Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MAIDUGURI   (Nigeria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JOS   (Nigeria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETER; ADULT; ARTICLE; CRITERION RELATED VALIDITY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNATIONAL PHYSICAL ACTIVITY QUESTIONNAIRE; MALE; NIGERIA; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF REPORT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ACCELEROMETRY; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NIGERIA; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 84900299754     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087233     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, et al, for the Lancet physical activity series working group (2012) Effect of physical inactivity on major noncommunicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of diseases and life expectancy. Lancet 380: 219-229.
2. Bull FC, Armstrong T, Dixon T, Ham S, Neiman A, et al. (2005) Physical Inactivity. In: Ezzati M, Lopez A, Rodgers A, Murray C (eds). Comparative Quantification of Health Risks: Global and Regional Burden of Disease due to Selected Major Risk Factors. World Health Organization; Geneva, pp. 729-881.
3. Kohl 3rd HW, Criag CL, Lambert EV, Inoue S, Alkandari JR, et al, for the Lancet physical activity series working group (2012) The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. Lancet 380: 294-305.
4. Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, et al, for the Lancet physical activity series working group (2012) Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet 380:247-257.
5. Prince SA, Adamo KB, Hamel ME, Hardt J, Gorber SC, et al. (2008) comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 5: 56.
6. Sallis JF, Saelens BE (2000) Assessment of physical activity by self-report: status, limitations, and future directions. Res Q Exerc Sport 71: 1-14.
7. Sloothmaker SM, Schuit AJ, Chinapaw MJM, Seidell JC, Mechelen WV (2009) Disagreement in physical activity assessed by accelerometer and self report in sub groups of age, gender, education and weight statues. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 6:17.
8. Loney T, Standage M, Thompson D, Sebire SJ, Cumming S (2011) Self-Report vs. Objectively Assessed Physical Activity: Which Is Right for Public Health? J Phys Act Health 8: 62-70.
9. Hagstromer M, Ainsworth BE, Oja P, Sjostrom M (2010) Comparison of a subjective and an objective measure of physical activity in a population sample. J Phys Act Health 7: 541-550.
10. Ekelund U, Sepp H, Brage S, Becker W, Jakes R, et al. (2006) Criterion-related validity of the last 7-day, short form of the international physical activity questionnaire in Swedish adults. Public Health Nutr 2: 258-265.
11. Mackay LM, Oliver M, Schofield GM (2011) Demographic variations in discrepancies between objective and subjective measures of physical activity. Open Journal of Preventive Medicine 1: 13-19.
12. Freedson PS, Miller K (2000) Objective monitoring of physical activity using motion sensors and heart rate. Res Q Exerc Sport 71(Suppl):21-29.
13. De Cocker K, Cardon G, De Bourdeaudhuij I (2007) Pedometer-determined physical activity and its comparison with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire in a sample of Belgian adults. Res Q Exerc Sport 78: 429-437.
14. Troiano RP, BerriganD, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, et al. (2008) Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40: 181-188.
15. Brage S, Wedderkopp N, Franks PW (2003) Reexamination of validity and reliability of the CSA monitor in walking and running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35: 1447-1454. (Pubitemid 36936168)
16. Melanson EL Jr., Freedson PS (1995) Validity of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. (CSA) activity monitor. Med Sci Sports Exerc 27:934-940
17. Nichols JF, Morgan CG, Chabot LE, Sallis JF, Calfas KJ (2000). Assessment of physical activity with the Computer Science and Applications, Inc., accelerometer: laboratory versus field validation. Res Q Exerc Sport 71:36-43.
18. Napolitano MA, Borradaile KE, Lewis BA, Whiteley JA, Longval JL, et al. (2010) Accelerometer use in a physical activity intervention trial. Contemp Clini Trials 31: 514-523.
19. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, et al. (2003) International physical activity questionnaire: 12 country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35: 1381-1395. (Pubitemid 36936159)
20. Sobnqwi E, Mbanya JCN, Urwin NC, Aspray TJ, Alberti KGMM (2001) Development and validation of a questionnaire for the assessment of physical activity in epidemiological studies in Sub-saharan Africa. Int J Epidemiol 30: 1361-1368. (Pubitemid 34134291)
21. Guthold R, Ono T, Strong KL, Chatterji S, Morabia A (2008) Worldwide variability in physical inactivity: a 51-country survey. Am J Prev Med 34:486-494 (Pubitemid 351615487)
22. Kerr J, Sallis JF, Owen N, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Cerin E, et al. (2013) Advancing science and policy through a coordinated international study of physical activity and built environments: IPEN Methods. J Phys Act Health, in Press.
23. Bauman A, Bull FC, Craig CL, Chey T, Ainsworth BE, et al. (2009) The International prevalence study on physical activity: results from 20 countries. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 6:21.
24. Hallal PC, Simoes E, Reichert FF, Azevedo MR, Ramos LR, et al. (2010) Validity and reliability of the telephone-administered international physical activity questionnaire in Brazil. J Phys Act Health 7: 402-409.
25. Nicaise V, Marshall S, Ainsworth BE (2011) Domain-Specific Physical Activity and Self-Report Bias Among Low-Income Latinas Living in San Diego County. J Phys Act Health 8: 881-890.
26. Hagstromer M, Oja P, Sjostrom M (2006) The international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) a study of concurrent and construct validity. Public Health Nutr 9: 755-762. (Pubitemid 46211749)
27. Oyeyemi AL, Oyeyemi AY, Adegoke BOA, Oyetoke FO, Aliyu HN, et al. (2011) Cross Cultural Adaptation of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire: Reliability and Validity of the Hausa Version in Nigeria. BMC Med Res Methodol 11: 156.
28. Kurtze N, Rangul V, Hustveldt B (2008) Reliability and validity of the international physical activity questionnaire in the Nord-Trondelag Health Study (HUNT) population of men. BMC Med Res Methodol 8:63
29. Chu AH, Moy FM (2013) Reliability and Validity of the Malay International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-M) Among a Malay Population in Malaysia. Asia Pac J Public Health. in press.
30. Chun MY (2012) Validity and reliability of Korean version of international physical activity questionnaire short form in the elderly. Korean J Fam Med 33: 144-151.
31. Graff-Iversen S, Anderssen SA, Holme IM, Jenum AK, Raastad T (2007) An adapted version of the long international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ L): Construct validity in a low income, multiethnic population study from Oslo, Norway. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 4:13
32. Papathanasiou G, Georgoudis G, Papandreou M, Spyropoulous P, Georgakopoulos D, et al. (2009) Reliability measures of the short international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) in Greek young adults. Hellenic Journal of Cardiology 50: 283-294.
33. National Bureau of Statistics (2008) Statistical fact sheet and population census. Federal Republic of Nigeria 2008. Available: http://www.nigerianstat.gov.ng. Accessed 28 August 2012.
34. National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria] and ORC Macro (2004) Nigeria Demographics and Health Survey 2003. Calverton, Maryland: National Population Commission and ORC Macro.
35. National African Language Resources Center (2010) Hausa language and culture. National African Language Resources Center (NALC): University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
36. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J (1998) Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30: 777-781. (Pubitemid 28211005)
37. World Health Organization (2000) Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. WHO Technical Report Series 894 2000. World Health Organization. Available: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO-TRS-894.pdf. Accessed 23 August 2013
38. John D, Freedson P (2012) Actigraph and Actical physical activity monitor: a peak under the hood. Med Sci Sports Exerc 44: S86-S89.
39. Trost SG, Mclver KL, Pate RR (2005) Conducting accelerometer- based activity assessments in field-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37; S531-S543. (Pubitemid 41691816)
40. World Health Organization (2010) Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
41. Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, et al, for the American College of Sports Medicine (2011) Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 43: 1334-1359.
42. Rzewnicki R, Vanden Auweele Y, De Bourdeaudhuij I (2003) Addressing over-reporting on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) telephone survey with a population sample. Public Health Nutr 6: 299-305. (Pubitemid 36682089)
43. Johnson-Kozlow M, Sallis JF, Gilpin EA, Rock CL, Pierce JP (2006) Comparative validation of the IPAQ and the 7-Day PAR among women diagnosed with breast cancer. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 3:7.
44. Bauman A, Ainsworth BE, Bull F, Craig CL, Hagströmer M, et al. (2009) Progress and pitfalls in the use of the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) for adult physical activity surveillance. J Phys Act Health 6: 5-8.
45. Sirard JR, Melanson EL, Li L, Freedson PS (2000) Field evaluation of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. physical activity monitor. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32: 695-700. (Pubitemid 30158345)
46. Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sjostrom M, Westerterp K (2000). Field evaluation of the computer Science and Application's Inc. activity monitor during running and skating training in adolescent athletes. Int J Sports Med 21: 586-592. (Pubitemid 32002972)
47. Bassett DR Jr. (2000) Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport; 71:30-36.
48. Washburn RA, Heath GW, Jackson AW (2000) Reliability and validity issues concerning large-scale surveillance of physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport 71:104-113.
49. Rosenberg DE, Bull FC, Marshall AL, Sallis JF, Bauman AE (2008) Assessment of sedentary behavior with the international physical activity questionnaire. J Phys Act Health 5: 30-44.