Comparative validation of the IPAQ and the 7-day PAR among women diagnosed with breast cancer

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Volumn 3, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Johnson Koslow, Marilyn ^a   Sallis, James F ^b   Gilpin, Elizabeth A ^c   Rock, Cheryl L ^c   Pierce, John P ^c  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETRY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; CRITERION RELATED VALIDITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PREDICTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VALIDATION STUDY;

EID: 33646891298     PISSN: 14795868     EISSN: 14795868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-3-7     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Kriska AM, Caspersen CJ, eds: A collection of physical activity questionnaires for health-related research. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997, 29(Suppl 6):S1-S205.
2. Montoye HJ, Kemper HCG, Saris WHM, Washburn RA: Measuring Physical Activity and Energy Expenditure Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1996.
3. Sallis JF, Saelens BE: Assessment of physical activity by self-report: status, limitations, and future directions. Res Q Exerc Sport 2000, 71:1-14.
4. Jacobs DR Jr, Ainsworth BE, Hartman TJ, Leon AS: A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993, 25:81-91.
5. Blair SN: How to assess exercise habits and physical fitness. In Behavioral health. A handbook of health enhancement and disease prevention Edited by: Matarazzo JD, Herd JA, Miller NE, Weiss SSM. New York. Wiley; 1984:424-447.
6. Sallis JF, Haskell WL, Wood PD, et al.: Physical activity assessment methodology in the five-city project. Am J Epidemiol 1985, 212:91-106.
7. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, the IPAQ Consensus Group and the IPAQ Reliability and Validity Study Group, et al.: International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003, 35:1381-1391.
8. Pierce JP, Faerber S, Wright FA, for the Women's Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) Study Group, et al.: A randomized trial of the effect of a plant-based dietary pattern on additional breast cancer events and survival: the Women's Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) Study. Control Clin Trial 2002, 23:728-756.
9. Johnson-Kozlow MF: Validity and Measurement Bias in Three Self-Report Measures of Physical Activity among Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer. In PhD thesis San Diego, CA: University of California, San Diego/San Diego State University; 2003.
10. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J: Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998, 30:777-781.
11. Sarkin JA, Campbell L, Gross L, et al.: Project GRAD Seven-Day Physical Activity Recall Interviewer's Manual. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997, 29(Suppl 6):S91-S102.
12. Bland JM, Altman DJ: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet 1986, 1:307-310.
13. Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, Haskell WL, Macera CA, Bouchard C: Physical activity and public health: a recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. J Am Med Assoc 1995, 273:402-407.
14. Fleiss JL: Statistical methods for rates and proportions 2nd edition. New York. John Wiley and Sons; 1981.
15. Hayden-Wade HA, Coleman KJ, Sallis JF, Armstrong C: Validation of the telephone and in-person interview versions of the 7-Day PAR. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003, 35:801-809.
16. Fisher RP, Quigly KL: Applying cognitive theory in public health investigations: enhancing food recall with the cognitive interview. Questions about questions: Inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys 1992:154-169.
17. Tucker C, Bennett C: Procedural effects in the collection of consumer expenditure information: the diary operation test. In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods Washington, DC: American Statistical Association; 1988:256-261.
18. Durante R, Ainsworth BE: The recall of physical activity: using a cognitive model of the question-answering process. Med Sci Sports Exer 1996, 28:1282-1291.
19. Johnson MF, Sallis JF, Hovell MF: Self-report assessment of walking: effects of aided recall instructions and item order. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci 2000, 4:141-155.
20. Swan PD, Spitler DL, Whiddon S, Evans BW, Wells MF: Assessment of lifetime patterns of dairy food intake and physical activity. Nutr Health 1997, 4:255-270.
21. Menon G: Are the parts better than the whole? the effects of decompositional questions on judgments of frequent behaviors. J Marketing Res 1997, 34:335-346.
22. Leenders NYJM, Sherman WM, Nagaraja HN, Kien CL: Evaluation of methods to assess physical activity in free-living conditions. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001, 33:1233-1240.
23. Welk GJ, Blair SN, Wood K, Jones S, Thompson RW: A comparative evaluation of three accelerometry-based physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000, 32(Suppl 9):S489-S497.
24. Rzewnicki R, Vanden Auweele Y, De Bourdeaudhuij I: Addressing over-reporting on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) telephone survey with a population sample. Public Health Nutr 2003, 6:299-305.
25. Manson JE, Greenland P, LaCroix AZ, et al.: Walking compared with vigorous exercise for the prevention of cardiovascular events in women. N Engl J Med 2002, 347:716-725.
26. Hendelman D, Miller K, Baggett C, Debold E, Freedson P: Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000, 32(Suppl 9):S442-S449.
27. Metcalf BS, Curnow JSH, Evans C, Voss LD, Wilkin TJ: Technical reliability of the CSA activity monitor: The EarlyBird Study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002, 34:1533-1537.