Community engagement in US biobanking: Multiplicity of meaning and method

Public Health Genomics

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 84-94

  Haldeman, K M ^a   Cadigan, R J ^a,b   Davis, A ^a,b   Goldenberg, A ^c   Henderson, G E ^a,b   Lassiter, D ^b   Reavely, E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biobanks; Community engagement; Ethical, legal and social issues; Qualitative methods

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY CARE; COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; UNITED STATES; ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PERCEPTION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS;

BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; COMMUNICATION; COMMUNITY-INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; GOALS; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; JOB SATISFACTION; LIVING DONORS; TELEPHONE; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84900015671     PISSN: 16624246     EISSN: 16628063     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000357958     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. McCloskey DJ, McDonald MA, Cook J, Heurtin-Roberts S, Updegrove S, Sampson D, Gutter S, Eder M: Community engagement: definitions and organizing concepts from the literature. 2011. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ communityengagement/pdf/PCE-Report-Chapter-1-SHEF.pdf.
2. Henderson GE, Cadigan RJ, Edwards TP, Conlon I, Nelson AG, Evans JP, Davis AM, Zimmer C, Weiner BJ: Characterizing biobank organizations in the U.S.: results from a national survey. Genome Med 2013; 5: 3.
3. Cornwall A, Jewkes R: What is participatory research ? Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 1667-1676.
4. Shalowitz MU, Isacco A, Barquin N, Clark-Kauffman E, Delger P, Nelson D, Quinn A, Wagenaar KA: Community-based participatory research: a review of the literature with strategies for community engagement. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2009; 30: 350-361.
5. Rowley D, Tosteson H: Racial differences in preterm delivery: developing a new research paradigm. New York, Oxford University Press, 1993.
6. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB: Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health 1998; 19: 173-202.
7. Minkler M, Wallerstein N: The growing support for CBPR; in Minkler M, Wallerstein N (eds): Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: From Process to Outcomes, ed 2. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 2008.
8. Wallerstein N, Duran B: Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am J Public Health 2010; 100(suppl 1):S40-S46.
9. Horowitz CR, Robinson M, Seifer S: Community-based participatory research from the margin to the mainstream: are researchers prepared? Circulation 2009; 119: 2633-2642.
10. Ahmed SM, Palermo AG: Community engagement in research: frameworks for education and peer review. Am J Public Health 2010; 100: 1380-1387.
11. Chung B, Jones L, Jones A, Corbett CE, Booker T, Wells KB, Collins B: Using community arts events to enhance collective efficacy and community engagement to address depression in an African American community. Am J Public Health 2009; 99: 237-244.
12. Juengst ET: Community engagement in genetic research: the 'slow code' of research ethics?; in Knoppers BM (ed): Populations and Genetics: Legal and Socio-Ethical Perspectives. Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2003, pp 181-198.
13. Anderson N, Bragg C, Hartzler A, Edwards K: Participant-centric initiatives: tools to facilitate engagement in research. Appl Transl Genomics 2012; 1: 25-29.
14. Ahmed SM, Palermo AG: Community engagement in research: frameworks for education and peer review. Am J Public Health 2010; 100: 1380-1387.
15. Isler MR, Corbie-Smith G: Practical steps to community engaged research: from inputs to outcomes. J Law Med Ethics 2012; 40: 904-914.
16. Ross LF, Loup A, Nelson RM, Botkin JR, Kost R, Smith GR Jr, Gehlert S: Human subjects protections in community-engaged research: a research ethics framework. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2010; 5: 5-17.
17. Beskow LM, Dean E: Informed consent for biorepositories: assessing prospective participants' understanding and opinions. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008; 17: 1440-1451.
18. Tindana PO, Rozmovits L, Boulanger RF, Bandewar SVS, Aborigo RA, Hodgson AVO, Kolopack P, Lavery JV: Aligning community engagement with traditional authority structures in global health research: a case study from northern Ghana. Am J Public Health 2011; 101: 1857-1867.
19. Lemke AA, Wu JT, Waudby C, Pulley J, Somkin CP, Trinidad SB: Community engagement in biobanking : experiences from the eMERGE Network. Genomics Soc Policy 2010; 6: 35-52.
20. Clayton EW, Smith M, Fullerton SM, Burke W, McCarty CA, Koenig BA, McGuire AL, Beskow LM, Dressler L, Lemke AA, Ramos EM, Rodriguez LL; Consent and Community Consultation Working Group of the eMERGE Consortium: Confronting real time ethical, legal, and social issues in the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Consortium. Genet Med 2010; 12: 616-620.
21. Godard B, Marshall J, Laberge C: Community engagement in genetic research: results of the first public consultation for the Quebec CARTaGENE project. Community Genet 2007; 10: 147-158.
22. Avard D, Knoppers BM: Genomic medicine: considerations for health professionals and the public. Genome Med 2009; 1: 25.
23. Tutton R: Constructing participation in genetic databases: citizenship, governance, and ambivalence. Sci Technol Hum Val 2007; 32: 172-195.
24. Hewitt RE: Biobanking: the foundation of personalized medicine. Curr Opin Oncol 2011; 23: 112-119.
25. McCarty CA, Garber A, Reeser JC, Fost NC; Personalized Medicine Research Project Community Advisory Group and Ethics and Security Advisory Board: Study newsletters, community and ethics advisory boards, and focus group discussions provide ongoing feedback for a large biobank. 2011; 155A:737-741.
26. O'Doherty KC, Hawkins A: Structuring public engagement for effective input in policy development on human tissue biobanking. Public Health Genomics 2010; 13: 197-206.
27. McCarty CA, Chapman-Stone D, Derfus T, Giampietro PF, Fost N; Marshfield Clinic PMRP Community Advisory Group: Community consultation and communication for a population-based DNA biobank: the Marshfield clinic personalized medicine research project. Am J Med Genet A 2008; 146A:3026-3033.
28. Ormond KE, Cirino AL, Helenowski IB, Chisholm RL, Wolf WA: Assessing the understanding of biobank participants. Am J Med Genet A 2009; 149A:188-198.
29. Cadigan RJ, Lassiter D, Haldeman K, Conlon I, Reavely E, Henderson GE: Neglected ethical issues in biobank management: results from a U.S. Study. Life Sci Soc Policy 2013; 9: 1.
30. Lemke AA, Wolf WA, Hebert-Beirne J, Smith ME: Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing. Public Health Genomics 2010; 13: 368-377.
31. Dickert N, Sugarman J: Ethical goals of community consultation in research. Am J Public Health 2005; 95: 1123-1127.
32. Newman PA: Towards a science of community engagement. Lancet 2006; 367: 302.
33. O'Doherty KC, Burgess MM, Edwards K, Gallagher RP, Hawkins AK, Kaye J, McCaffrey V, Winickoff DE: From consent to institutions: designing adaptive governance for genomic biobanks. Soc Sci Med 2011; 73: 367-374.
34. Knoppers BM: Populations and Genetics: Legal and Socio-Ethical Perspectives. Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2003.
35. Brunger F: Problematizing the notion of 'community' in research ethics; in Knoppers BM (ed): Populations and Genetics: Legal and Socio-Ethical Perspectives. Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2003, pp 245-256.
36. Weijer C: Philosophical and Pragmatic Challenges. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 1999; 8: 501-513.
37. Gbadegesin S, Wendler D: Protecting communities in health research from exploitation. Bioethics 2006; 20: 248-253.
38. Lidz CW, Simon LJ, Seligowski AV, Myers S, Gardner W, Candilis PJ, Arnold R, Appelbaum PS: The participation of community members on medical institutional review boards. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2012; 7: 1-6.