Human subjects protections in community-engaged research: A research ethics framework

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 5-17

  Ross, Lainie Friedman ^a   Loup, Allan ^b   Nelson, Robert M ^c   Botkin, Jeffrey R ^d   Kost, Rhonda ^e   Smith Jr , George R ^f   Gehlert, Sarah ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^e ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f Healthcare Consortium of Illinois ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Academic community partnerships; Autonomy; Community; Community based participatory research; Community engaged research; Human subjects protections; Moral agency; Research ethics; Risks

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ETHICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN RIGHTS; NOMENCLATURE; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PUBLIC RELATIONS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; COMMUNITY-INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMAN RIGHTS; HUMANS; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; RISK ASSESSMENT; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 77949860273     PISSN: 15562646     EISSN: 15562654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.1.5     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. BENJAMIN, A. F. (2002). Jews of the Dutch Caribbean: Exploring ethnic identity on Curaçao. London, England: Routledge.
2. BROWN, A. S. (1989). A survey on elder abuse at one Native American tribe. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 1 (2), 17-38.
3. CHILDRESS, J. F., MELSIN, E. M., & SHAPIRO, H. T. (2005). Belmont revisited: Ethical principles for research with human subjects. Washington D. C.: Georgetown University Press.
4. Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Consortium Community Engagement Key Function Committee and CTSA Community Engagement Workshop Planning Committee. (2009). Researchers and their communities: The challenge of meaningful community engagement. Retrieved January 28, 2010 from http://www.aecom.yu.edu/uploadedFiles/ICTR/CE%20Monograph.pdf?n=1851.
5. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). (1981). Protection of Human Subjects: Final Regulations Amending Basic HHS Policy for the Protection of Human Research Subjects (45 CFR 46, Subpart A). Federal Register, 46, 8366-8391.
6. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). (2009). Protection of human subjects. Revised rules (45 CFR 46). Retrieved January 28, 2010 from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/documents/OHRPRegulations.pdf.
7. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). (1996). Federal regulations: Protection of human subjects informed consent and waiver of informed consent requirements in certain emergency research: Final rules (21 CFR Part 50.24 and 45 CFR 46.101). Federal Register, 61 (192), 51497-51531.
8. DEVRIES, R., DEBRUIN, D. A., & GOODGAME, A. (2004). Ethics review of social, behavioral, and economic research: Where should we go from here? Ethics and Behavior, 14 (4), 351-368.
9. DRESSER, R. (2001). When science offers salvation: Patient advocacy and research ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10. ECKENWILER, L. (2001). Moral reasoning and the review of research involving human subjects. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 11 (1), 37-69.
11. EMMANUEL, I. & EMMANUEL, S. (1970). History of the Jews of the Netherlands Antilles. Cincinnati, OH: American Jewish Archives.
12. FLICKER, S., TRAVERS, R., GUTA, A., MCDONALD, S., & MEAGHER, A. (2007). Ethical dilemmas in community-based participatory research: Recommendations for institutional review boards. Journal of Urban Health, 84 (4), 478-493.
13. HAUSMAN, D. (2008a). Group risks, risks to groups, and group engagement in genetics research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 17 (4), 351-369.
14. HAUSMAN, D. (2008b). Protecting groups from genetic research. Bioethics, 22 (3), 157-165.
15. Havasupai Tribe of Havasupai Reservation v. Arizona Board of Regents. (2008). 204 P.3d 1063 (Ariz. Ct. App.).
16. ISRAEL, B. A., SCHULZ, A. J., PARKER, E., & Becker, A. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Ann. Rev. Public Health, 19, 173-202.
17. KHOURY, M., BERG, A., COATES, R., EVANS, J., TEUTSCH, S. M., & BRADLEY, L. A. (2008). The evidence dilemma in genomic medicine. Health Affairs, 27 (6), 1600-1611.
18. KING, N., HENDERSON, G., & STEIN, J. (1999). Relationships in research: A new paradigm. In N. King & J. Stein (Eds.), Beyond regulations: Ethics in human subjects research (pp. 1-18). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
19. LESSER, J. & OSCÓS-SÁNCHEZ, M. A. (2007). Communityacademic research partnerships with vulnerable populations. Annual Review of Nursing Research, 25, 317-337.
20. MALONE, R. E., YERGER, V. B., MCGRUDER, C., & FROELICHER, E. (2006). "It's like Tuskegee in reverse": A case study of ethical tensions in institutional review board review of community-based participatory research. American Journal of Public Health, 96 (11), 1914-1919.
21. MAY, L. (1987). The morality of groups. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
22. MCGOVERN, T. F. (1998). Vulnerability: Reflection on its ethical implications for the protection of participants in SAMHSA programs. Ethics and Behavior, 8 (4), 293-304.
23. MERZ, J. F., MAGNUS, D., CHO, M. K., & CAPLAN, K. L. (2002). Protecting subjects' interests in genetics research. American Journal of Human Genetics, 70 (4), 965-971.
24. MONTANARO, L. (2009). The democratic legitimacy of 'selfappointed' representatives. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia, Canada.
25. MORAHAN, P. S., YAMAGATA, H., MCDADE, S. A., RICHMAN, R., FRANCIS, R., & Odhner, V. C. (2006). New challenges facing interinstitutional social science and educational program evaluation research at academic health centers: A case study from the ELAM program. Academic Medicine, 81 (6), 527-534.
26. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1976). Research involving prisoners. Retrieved January 28, 2010 from http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/pastcommissions/ Researchinvolving-prisoners.pdf.
27. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1977). Research involving children. Retrieved January 28, 2010 from http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/past-commissions/Research- involving-children. pdf.
28. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Retrieved January 28, 2010 from http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html.
29. NICKEL, J. (1997). Group agency and group rights. In I. Shapiro & W. Kymlicka (Eds.), Ethnicity and group rights: Nomos XXXIX (pp. 235-256). New York, NY: New York University Press.
30. POWERS, M. & FADEN, R. R. (Eds.). (2006). Social justice: The moral foundations of public health and health policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
31. PRENTICE, E. & GORDON, B. (2001). Institutional Review Board assessment of risks and benefits associated with research. In National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Ethical and policy issues in research involving human participants-Volume II: Commissioned papers (pp. 343-358). Bethesda, MD: NBAC.
32. REYNOLDS, D. (2000). Protecting the human subjects of social science research-The role of institutional review boards. Bioethics Forum, 16 (4), 31-36.
33. STAMATOYANNOPOULOS, G. (1974). Problems of screening and counseling in the hemoglobinopathies. In A. G. Motulsky & W. Lenz (Eds.), Birth defects (pp. 268-276). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Excerpta Medica.
34. STRUEWING, J. P., HARTGE, P., WACHOLDER, S., BAKER, S. M., BERLIN, M., MCADAMS, M., TIMMERMAN, M. M., BRODY, L. C., & TUCKER, M. A. (1997). The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews. New England Journal of Medicine, 336 (20), 1401-1408.
35. Yale CARE (Clinical Alliance for Research and Engagement) Ethical Principles of Engagement Committee. (2009). Principles and guidelines for community-university research partnerships. Retrieved January 28, 2010 from http://ycci.yale.edu/resources/docs/PrinciplesforU-CPs-001.pdf.