Fast but ephemeral effects of ecological restoration on forest beetle community

Biodiversity and Conservation

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1485-1507

  Komonen, Atte ^a   Kuntsi, Satu ^a   Toivanen, Tero ^a,b   Kotiaho, Janne S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^b BirdLife Finland   (Finland)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Coarse woody debris; Coleoptera; Conservation biology; Dead wood; Saproxylic

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; BEETLE; BIODIVERSITY; COARSE WOODY DEBRIS; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; DEAD WOOD; PROTECTED AREA; RED LIST; RESTORATION ECOLOGY;

FINLAND;

COLEOPTERA; CONIFEROPHYTA; PICEA;

EID: 84900009326     PISSN: 09603115     EISSN: 15729710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-014-0678-6     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aksenov D, Dobrynin D, Dubinin M, Egorov A, Isaev A, Karpachevskiy M, Laestadius L, Potapov P, Purekhovskiy A, Turubanova S, Yaroshenko A (2002) Atlas of Russia's intact forest landscapes. Global Forest Watch Russia, Moscow.
2. Berglund H, Jönsson M, Penttilä R, Vanha-Majamaa I (2011) The effects of burning and dead-wood creation on the diversity of pioneer wood-inhabiting fungi in managed boreal spruce forests. For Ecol Manag 261: 1293-1305.
3. Bryant D, Nielsen D, Tangley L (1997) The last frontier forests: ecosystems and economies on the edge. World Resources Institute, Washington.
4. CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2010) COP 10 decision X/2: strategic plan for biodiversity 2011-2020. http://www. cbd. int/decision/cop/?id=12268. (accessed 06. 12).
5. Esseen P-E, Ehnström B, Ericson L, Sjöberg K (1997) Boreal forests. Ecol Bull 46: 16-47.
6. Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309: 570-574.
7. Grove SJ (2001) Extent and decomposition of dead wood in Australian lowland tropical rainforest with different management histories. For Ecol Manag 154: 35-53.
8. Grove SJ (2002) Saproxylic insect ecology and the sustainable management of forests. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 33: 1-23.
9. Halme P, Allen KA, Auniņš A, Bradshaw RHW, Brūmelis G, Čada V, Clear JL, Eriksson A-M, Hannon G, Hyvärinen E, Ikauniece S, Iršėnaitė R, Jonsson BG, Junninen K, Kareksela S, Komonen A, Kotiaho JS, Kouki J, Kuuluvainen T, Mazziotta A, Mönkkönen M, Nyholm K, Oldén A, Shorohova E, Strange N, Toivanen T, Vanha-Majamaa I, Wallenius T, Ylisirniö A-L, Zin E (2013) Challenges of ecological restoration: lessons from forests in northern Europe. Biol Conserv 167: 248-256.
10. Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Sollins P, Gregory SV, Lattin JD, Anderson NH, Cline SP, Aumen NG, Sedell JR, Lienkaemper GW, Cromack K Jr, Cummins KW (1986) Ecology of coarse woody debris on temperate ecosystems. Adv Ecol Res 15: 133-302.
11. Hobbs RJ, Hallett LM, Ehrlich PR, Mooney HA (2011) Intervention ecology: applying ecological science in the twenty-first century. Bioscience 61: 442-450.
12. Hyvärinen E, Aapala K (eds) (2009) Metsien ja soiden ennallistamisen sekä harjumetsien paahdeympäristöjen hoidon seurantaohje. Metsähallituksen luonnonsuojelujulkaisuja. Sarja B 118. Vantaa.
13. Hyvärinen E, Kouki J, Martikainen P (2006) A comparison of three trapping methods used to survey forest-dwelling Coleoptera. Eur J Entomol 103: 397-407.
14. Hyvärinen E, Kouki J, Martikainen P (2009) Prescribed fires and retention trees help to conserve beetle diversity in managed boreal forests despite their transient negative effects on some beetle groups. Insect Conserv Divers 2: 93-105.
15. Ikauniece S, Brūmelis G, Zariņš J (2012) Linking woodland key habitat inventory and forest inventory data to prioritize districts needing conservation efforts. Ecol Indic 14: 18-26.
16. Jonsell M, Weslien J, Ehnström B (1998) Substrate requirements of red-listed saproxylic invertebrates in Sweden. Biodivers Conserv 7: 749-764.
17. Junninen K, Komonen A (2011) Conservation ecology of boreal polypores: a review. Biol Conserv 144: 11-20.
18. Junninen K, Kouki J, Renvall P (2008) Restoration of natural legacies of fire in European boreal forests: an experimental approach to the effects on wood-decaying fungi. Can J For Res 38: 202-215.
19. Kirby KJ, Reid CM, Thomas RC, Goldsmith FB (1998) Preliminary estimates of fallen dead wood and standing dead trees in managed and unmanaged forests in Britain. J Appl Ecol 35: 148-155.
20. Komonen A, Halme P, Jäntti M, Koskela T, Kotiaho JS, Toivanen T (2104) Created substrates do not fully mimic natural substrates in restoration: the occurrence of polypores on spruce logs. Silva Fennica 48(1). http://dx. doi. org/10. 14214/sf. 980.
21. Kouki J, Löfman S, Martikainen P, Rouvinen S, Uotila A (2001) Forest fragmentation in Fennoscandia: linking habitat requirements of wood-associated threatened species to landscape and habitat changes. Scand J For Res, Suppl 3: 27-37.
22. Kouki J, Hyvärinen E, Lappalainen H, Martikainen P, Similä M (2012) Landscape context affects the success of habitat restoration: large-scale colonization patterns of saproxylic and fire-associated species in boreal forests. Divers Distrib 18: 348-355.
23. Krankina ON, Harmon ME, Kukuev YA, Treyfeld RF, Kashpor NN, Kresnov VG, Skudin VM, Protasov NA, Yatskov M, Spycher G, Povarov ED (2002) Coarse woody debris in forest regions of Russia. Can J For Res 32: 768-778.
24. Kuuluvainen T (2002) Natural variability of forests as a reference for restoring and managing biological diversity in boreal Fennoscandia. Silva Fenn 36: 97-125.
25. Lee P, Aksenov D, Laestadius L, Nogueron R, Smith W (2006) Canada's large intact forest landscapes. Global Forest Watch Canada, Edmonton.
26. Leroux SJ, Krawchuk MA, Schmiegelow F, Cumming SG, Lisgo K, Anderson LG, Petkova M (2010) Global protected areas and IUCN designations: do the categories match the conditions? Biol Conserv 143: 609-616.
27. Lindhe A, Asenblad N, Toresson H (2004) Cut logs and high stumps of spruce, birch, aspen and oak - nine years of saproxylic fungi succession. Biol Conserv 119: 443-454.
28. Mäkinen H, Hynynen J, Siitonen J, Sievänen R (2006) Predicting the decomposition of Scots pine, Norway spruce, and birch stems in Finland. Ecol Appl 16: 1865-1879.
29. Martikainen P, Kouki J (2003) Sampling the rarest: threatened beetles in boreal forest biodiversity inventories. Biodivers Conserv 12: 1815-1831.
30. McGeoch MA, Schroeder M, Ekbom B, Larsson S (2007) Saproxylic beetle diversity in a managed boreal forest: importance of stand characteristics and forestry conservation measures. Divers Distrib 13: 418-429.
31. Müller J, Bütler R (2010) A review of habitat thresholds for dead wood: a baseline for management recommendations in European forests. Eur J For Res 129: 981-992.
32. Nieto A, Alexander KNA (2010) European red list of saproxylic beetles. Publications office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
33. Olsson J, Jonsson BG (2010) Restoration fire and wood-inhabiting fungi in a Swedish Pinus sylvestris forest. For Ecol Manag 259: 1971-1980.
34. Olsson J, Jonsson BG, Hjältén J, Ericson L (2011) Addition of coarse woody debris - The early fungal succession on Picea abies logs in managed forests and reserves. Biol Conserv 144: 1100-1110.
35. Rassi P (ed.) (1993) Suomen kovakuoriaisten (Coleoptera) frekvenssipisteet 1. 1. 1960-1. 1. 1990. Maailman Luonnon Säätiön WWF Suomen Rahaston Raportteja Nro 6. Helsinki.
36. Rassi P, Alanen A, Kanerva T, Mannerkoski I (eds) (2001) Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus 2000. Ympäristöministeriö & Suomen Ympäristökeskus, Helsinki.
37. Rassi P, Hyvärinen E, Juslén A, Mannerkoski I (eds) (2010) Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus - Punainen kirja 2010. Ympäristöministeriö & Suomen Ympäristökeskus, Helsinki.
38. Saint-Germain M, Drapeau P, Buddle CM (2008) Persistence of pyrophilous insects in fire-driven boreal forests: population dynamics in burned and unburned habitats. Divers Distrib 14: 713-720.
39. SER (2004) The SER international primer on ecological restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration, Science and Policy Working Group, Tucson.
40. Siitonen J (2001) Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecol Bull 49: 11-41.
41. Silfverberg H (2004) Enumeratio nova Coleopterorum Fennoscandiae, Daniae et Baltiae. Sahlbergia 9: 1-111.
42. Similä M, Junninen K (eds) (2011) Metsien ennallistamisen ja luonnonhoidon opas. Metsähallituksen luonnonsuojelujulkaisuja. Sarja B 157. Vantaa.
43. Similä M, Kouki J, Martikainen P (2003) Saproxylic beetles in managed and seminatural Scots pine forests: quality of dead wood matters. For Ecol Manag 174(365): 381.
44. Speight M (1989) Saproxylic invertebrates and their conservation. Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
45. Stokland JN, Siitonen J, Jonsson BG (2012) Biodiversity in dead wood. Ecology, Biodiversity and Conservation Series, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
46. Tikkanen O-P, Martikainen P, Hyvärinen E, Junninen K, Kouki J (2006) Red-listed boreal forest species of Finland: associations with forest structure, tree species, and decaying wood. Ann Zool Fenn 43: 373-383.
47. Toivanen T, Kotiaho JS (2007) Mimicking natural disturbances of boreal forests: the effects of controlled burning and creating dead wood on beetle diversity. Biodivers Conserv 16: 3193-3211.
48. Verheyen K, Hermy M (2001) Recruitment and growth of herb-layer species with different colonizing capacities in ancient and recent forests. J Veg Sci 15: 125-134.