Created substrates do not fully mimic natural substrates in restoration: The occurrence of polypores on spruce logs

Silva Fennica

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Komonen, Atte ^a   Halme, Panu ^a   Jäntti, Mari ^a   Koskela, Tuuli ^a   Kotiaho, Janne S ^a   Toivanen, Tero ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^b NONE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Boreal forest; Dead wood; Ecological restoration; Norway spruce; Protected area management; Substrate quality; Wood decaying fungi

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893984531     PISSN: 00375330     EISSN: 22424075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14214/sf.980     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Berglund H., Jönsson M., Penttilä R., Vanha-Majamaa I. (2011). The effects of burning and dead-wood creation on the diversity of pioneer wood-inhabiting fungi in managed boreal spruce forests. Forest Ecology and Management 261: 1293-1305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.01.008.
2. Boddy L., Frankland J.C., van West P. (2008). Ecology of saprotrophic basidiomycetes. Academic Press, Elsevier, Amsterdam. 386 p.
3. Colwell R.K. (2013). EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9. User guide and application. http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates/index.html.
4. Convention on Biological Diversity (2010). COP 10 decision X/2: strategic plan for biodiversity 2011-2020. http://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=12268. [Cited 10 Feb 2013].
5. Edman M., Jönsson M., Jonsson B.G. (2007). Fungi and wind strongly influence the temporal availability of logs in an old-growth spruce forest. Ecological Applications 17: 482-490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/06-0852.
6. Ellis E.C. (2011). Anthropogenic transformation of the terrestrial biosphere. Philosophical Trans- actions of the Royal Society A - Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 369: 1010-1035. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0331.
7. Ennallistamistyöryhmä (2003). Ennallistaminen suojelualueilla. Ennallistamistyöryhmän mietintö. Suomen ympäristö 618. 220 p.
8. Foley J.A., DeFries R., Asner G.P., Barford C., Bonan G., Carpenter S.R., Chapin F.S., Coe M.T., Daily G.C, Gibbs H.K., Helkowski J.H., Holloway T., Howard E.A., Kucharik C.J., Monfreda C., Patz J.A., Prentice I.C., Ramankutty N., Snyder P.K. (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science 309: 570-574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1111772.
9. Fukami T., Dickie I.A., Wilkie J.P., Paulus B.C., Park D., Roberts A., Buchanan P.K., Allen R.B. (2010). Assembly history dictates ecosystem functioning: evidence from wood decomposer com- munities. Ecology Letters 13: 675-684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01465.x.
10. Gärdenfors U. (ed.) (2010). The 2010 red list of Swedish species. Artdatabanken, Swedish Agricultural University, Uppsala, Sweden. 589 p.
11. Groot R.C.D. (1972). Growth of wood-inhabiting fungi in saturated atmospheres of monoterpenoids. Mycologia 64: 863-870. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3757941.
12. Halme P., Kotiaho J.S. (2012). The importance of timing and number of surveys in fungal biodiversity studies. Biodiversity and Conservation 21: 205-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0176-z.
13. Halme P., Allen K.A., Auniņš A., Bradshaw R.H.W., Brumelis G., Čada V., Clear J.L, Eriksson A.-M., Hannon G., Hyvärinen E., Ikauniece S., Iršenaite R., Jonsson B.G., Junninen K., Kareksela S., Komonen A., Kotiaho J.S., Kouki J., Kuuluvainen T., Mazziotta A., Mönkkönen M., Nyholm K., Oldén A., Shorohova E., Strange N., Toivanen T., Vanha-Majamaa I., Wallenius T., Ylisirniö A.-L., Zin E. (2013). Challenges of ecological restoration: lessons from forests in northern Europe. Biological Conservation 167: 248-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. biocon.2013.08.029.
14. Harmon M.E., Franklin J.F., Swanson F.J., Sollins P., Gregory S.V., Lattin J.D., Anderson N.H., Cline S.P., Aumen N.G., Sedell J.R., Lienkaemper G.W., Cromack Jr. K., Cummins K.W. (1986). Ecology of coarse woody debris on temperate ecosystems. Advances of Ecological Research 15: 133-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60121-X.
15. Hobbs R.J., Kramer V.A. (2008). Restoration ecology: interventionist approaches for restoring and maintaining ecosystem function in the face of rapid environmental change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33: 39-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.33.020107.113631.
16. Jönsson M., Edman M., Jonsson B.G. (2008). Colonization and extinction patterns of wooddecaying fungi in a boreal old-growth Picea abies forest. Journal of Ecology 96: 1065-1075. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01411.x.
17. Josefsson T., Olsson J., Östlund L. (2010). Linking forest history and conservation efforts: longterm impact of low-intensity timber harvest on forest structure and wood-inhabiting fungi in northern Sweden. Biological Conservation 143: 1803-1811. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. biocon.2010.04.035.
18. Junninen K., Komonen A. (2011). Conservation ecology of boreal polypores: a review. Biological Conservation 144: 11-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.07.010.
19. Junninen K., Kouki J., Renvall P. (2008). Restoration of natural legacies of fire in European boreal forests: an experimental approach to the effects on wood-decaying fungi. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38: 202-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/X07-145.
20. Komonen A. (2003). Hotspots of insect diversity in boreal forests. Conservation Biology 17: 976-981. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02076.x.
21. Kotiranta H., Saarenoksa R., Kytövuori I. (2009). Aphyllophoroid fungi of Finland. A check-list with ecology, distribution and threat categories. Norrlinia 19: 1-223.
22. Kuuluvainen T. (2002). Natural variability of forests as a reference for restoring and managing biological diversity in boreal Fennoscandia. Silva Fennica 36: 97-125.
23. Laarmann D., Korjus H., Sims A., Kangur A., Stanturf S.A. (2013). Initial effects of restoring natural forest structures in Estonia. Forest Ecology and Management 304: 303-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.05.022.
24. Lindhe A., Asenblad N., Toresson H. (2004). Cut logs and high stumps of spruce, birch, aspen and oak - nine years of saproxylic fungi succession. Biological Conservation 119: 443-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.01.005.
25. Lindner D.L., Vasaitis R., Kubartová A., Allmér J., Johannesson H., Banik M.T., Stenlid J. (2011). Initial fungal colonizer affects mass loss and fungal community development in Picea abies logs 6 yr after inoculation. Fungal Ecology 4: 449-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. funeco.2011.07.001.
26. Mäkinen H., Hynynen J., Siitonen J., Sievänen R. (2006). Predicting the decomposition of Scots pine, Norway spruce, and birch stems in Finland. Ecological Applications 16: 1865-1879. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1865:PTDOSP]2.0.CO;2.
27. Niemelä T. (2005). Käävät, puiden sienet. Botanical Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History, Helsinki. 319 p.
28. Olsson J., Jonsson B.G. (2010). Restoration fire and wood-inhabiting fungi in a Swedish Pinus sylvestris forest. Forest Ecology and Management 259: 1971-1980. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. foreco.2010.02.008.
29. Olsson J., Jonsson B.G., Hjältén J., Ericson L. (2011). Addition of coarse woody debris - the early fungal succession on Picea abies logs in managed forests and reserves. Biological Conservation 144: 1100-1110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.12.029.
30. Parfitt D., Hunt J., Dockrell D., Rogers H.J., Boddy L. (2010). Do all trees carry the seeds of their own destruction? PCR reveals numerous wood decay fungi latently present in sapwood of a wide range of angiosperm trees. Fungal Ecology 3: 338-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. funeco.2010.02.001.
31. Penttilä R., Kotiranta H. (1996). Short-term effects of prescribed burning on wood-rotting fungi. Silva Fennica 30: 399-419. http://dx.doi.org/10.14214/sf.a8501.
32. Penttilä R., Junninen K., Punttila P., Siitonen J. (2013). Effects of forest restoration by fire on polypores depend strongly on time since disturbance - a case study from Finland based on a 23-year monitoring period. Forest Ecology and Management 310: 508-516. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.08.061.
33. Rajala T., Peltoniemi M., Pennanen T., Mäkipää R. (2012). Fungal community dynamics in relation to substrate quality of decaying Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) logs in boreal forests. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 81: 494-505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01376.x.
34. Rassi P., Hyvärinen E., Juslèn A., Mannerkoski I. (eds.). (2010). Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus. Punainen kirja 2010. Ympäristöministeriö ja Suomen ympäristökeskus, Helsinki. 685 p.
35. Rayner A.D.M., Boddy L. (1988). Fungal decomposition of wood: its biology and ecology. John Wiley & Sons, Bath. 602 p.
36. Renvall P. (1995). Community structure and dynamics of wood-rotting Basidiomycetes on decomposing conifer trunks in northern Finland. Karstenia 35: 1-51.
37. Selonen V.A.O., Ahlroth P., Kotiaho J.S. (2005). Anthropogenic disturbance and diversity of species: polypores and polypore associated beetles in forest, forest edge and clear cut. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 20(Suppl 6): 49-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14004080510041002.
38. Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group (2004). The SER international primer on ecological restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration International. https://www.ser.org/resources/resources-detail-view/ser-international-primer-on-ecological-restoration. [Cited 12 August 2013].
39. Siitonen J. (2001). Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecological Bulletins 49: 11-41.
40. Similä M., Junninen K. (eds.). (2012). Ecological restoration and management in boreal forests - best practices from Finland. Metsähallitus Natural Heritage Services, Vantaa. 50 p.
41. Stokland J.N., Siitonen J., Jonsson B.G. (2012). Biodiversity in dead wood. Ecology, Biodiversity and Conservation Series, Cambridge University Press. 509 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9781139025843.
42. Toivanen T., Kotiaho J.S. (2007). Mimicking natural disturbances of boreal forests: the effects of controlled burning and creating dead wood on beetle diversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 3193-3211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9172-8.
43. Toivanen T., Kotiaho J.S. (2010). The preferences of saproxylic beetle species for different dead wood types created in forest restoration treatments. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 40: 445-464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/X09-205.
44. Toivanen T., Markkanen A., Kotiaho J.S., Halme P. (2012). The effect of forest fuel harvesting on the fungal diversity of clear-cuts. Biomass and Bioenergy 39: 84-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.11.016.
45. Vanha-Majamaa I., Lilja S., Ryömä R., Kotiaho J.S., Laaka-Lindberg S., Lindberg H., Puttonen P., Tamminen P., Toivanen T., Kuuluvainen T. (2007). Rehabilitating boreal forest structure and species composition in Finland through logging, dead wood creation and fire: the EVO experiment. Forest Ecology and Management 250: 77-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.012.
46. Wallenius T., Niskanen L., Virtanen T., Hottola J., Brumelis G., Angervuori A., Julkunen J., Pihlström M. (2010). Loss of habitats, naturalness and species diversity in Eurasian forest landscapes. Ecological Indicators 10: 1093-1101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.03.006.