Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of palm pressed fiber based on the three main components: Cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin

Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology

Volumn 173, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 409-420

  Lin, Lili ^a   Yan, Rong ^b   Jiang, Wenju ^c   Shen, Fei ^a   Zhang, Xiaohong ^a   Zhang, Yanzong ^a   Deng, Shihuan ^a   Li, Zhuang ^a  

^a SICHUAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^c SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Biomass components; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Palm pressed fiber

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CELLULOSE; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; LIGNIN;

ALKALINE SOLUTIONS; BIOMASS COMPONENTS; BIOMASS HYDROLYSIS; ENZYME COCKTAILS; PALM PRESSED FIBERS; X-RAY DIFFRACTOGRAMS;

ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS;

CELLULOSE; HEMICELLULOSE; LIGNIN;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; FIBER; HYDROLYSIS; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PALM PRESSED FIBER; SURFACE PROPERTY; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 84899959684     PISSN: 02732289     EISSN: 15590291     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12010-014-0848-8     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alvira, P., Tomás-Pejó, E., Ballesteros, M., & Negro, M. (2010). Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresource Technology, 101(13), 4851-4861.
2. Blasi, C. D., Signorelli, G., Russo, C. D., & Rea, G. (1999). Product distribution from pyrolysis of wood and agricultural residues. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 38(6), 2216-2224. (Pubitemid 29301913)
3. Cao, W. X., Sun, C., Liu, R. H., Yin, R. Z., & Wu, X. W. (2012). Comparison of the effects of five pretreatment methods on enhancing the enzymatic digestibility and ethanol production from sweet sorghum bagasse. Bioresource Technology, 111, 215-221.
4. Chang, V. S., & Holtzapple, M. T. (2000). Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic reactivity. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 84, 5-37. (Pubitemid 30349447)
5. Desai, S. G., & Converse, A. O. (1997). Substrate reactivity as a function of the extent of reaction in the enzymic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 56, 650-655. (Pubitemid 27505977)
6. Eremeeva, T., Bikova, T., Eisimonte, M., Viesturs, U., & Treimanis, A. (2001). Fractionation and molecular characteristics of cellulose during enzymatic hydrolysis. Cellulose, 8, 69-79. (Pubitemid 32826534)
7. He, Y. F., Pang, Y. Z., Liu, Y. P., Li, X. J., & Wang, K. S. (2008). Physicochemical characterization of rice straw pretreated with sodium hydroxide in the solid state for enhancing biogas production. Energy & Fuels, 22, 2775-2781.
8. Hong, J., Ye, X., & Zhang, Y. H. P. (2007). Quantitative determination of cellulose accessibility to cellulase based on adsorption of a non-hydrolytic fusion protein containing CBM and GFP with its applications. Langmuir, 23, 12535-12540. (Pubitemid 350284536)
9. Ibrahima, M. M., El-Zawawya, W. K., Abdel-Fattahb, Y. R., Solimanb, N. A., & Agblevor, F. A. (2011). Comparison of alkaline pulping with steam explosion for glucose production from rice straw. Carbohydrate Polymers, 83, 720-726.
10. Kumar, R., Mago, G., Balan, V., & Wyman, C. E. (2009). Physical and chemical characterizations of corn stover and poplar solids resulting from leading pretreatment technologies. Bioresource Technology, 100(17), 3948-3962.
11. Kumar, R., & Wyman, C. E. (2009). Does change in accessibility with conversion depend on both the substrate and pretreatment technology? Bioresource Technology, 100, 4193-4202.
12. Laureano-Perez, L., Teymouri, F., Alizadeh, H., & Dale, B. E. (2005). Understanding factors that limit enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 124, 1081-1099.
13. Lee, Y. H., & Fan, L. T. (1983). Kinetic studies of enzymatic hydrolysis of insoluble cellulose: (II) Analysis of Extended Hydrolysis Times. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 25, 939-966.
14. Lin, L., Yan, R., Liu, Y., & Jiang, W. (2010). In-depth investigation of enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass wastes based on three major components: cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. Bioresource Technology, 101(21), 8217-8223.
15. Ma, A., Hu, Q., Qu, Y., Bai, Z., Liu, W., & Zhuang, G. (2008). The enzymatic hydrolysis rate of cellulose decreases with irreversible adsorption of cellobiohydrolase I. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 42, 543-547.
16. Miller, G. L. (1959). Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytical Chemistry, 31(3), 426-428.
17. Mittal, A., Katahira, R., Himmel, M. E., & Johnson, D. K. (2011). Effects of alkaline or liquid-ammonia treatment on crystalline cellulose: changes in crystalline structure and effects on enzymatic digestibility. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 4, 41.
18. Pandey, K. K., & Pitman, A. J. (2003). FTIR studies of the changes in wood chemistry following decay by brown-rot and white-rot fungi. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 52(3), 151-160. (Pubitemid 37274460)
19. Riansa-ngawong, W., & Prasertsan, P. (2011). Optimization of furfural production from hemicellulose extracted from delignified palm pressed fiber using a two-stage process. Carbohydrate Research, 346, 103-110.
20. Segal, L., Creely, J. J., Martin, J. A. E., & Conrad, C. M. (1959). An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Textile Research Journal, 29(10), 786-794.
21. Selig, M. J., Vinzant, T. B., Himmel, M. E., & Decker, S. R. (2009). The effect of lignin removal by alkaline peroxide pretreatment on the susceptibility of corn stover to purified cellulolytic and xylanolytic enzymes. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 155(1-3), 397-406.
22. Soto, M. L., Domínguez, H., Núñez, M. J., & Lema, J. M. (1994). Enzymatic saccharification of alkali-treated sunflower hulls. Bioresource Technology, 49(1), 53-59. (Pubitemid 24284984)
23. Valjamae, P., Sild, V., Pettersson, G., & Johansson, G. (1999). Acid hydrolysis of bacterial cellulose reveals different modes of synergistic action between cellobiohydrolase I and endoglucanase I. European Journal of Biochemistry, 266, 327-334.
24. Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Gao, P., Shi, D., Liu, H., & Gao, H. (2006). Changes in the structural properties and rate of hydrolysis of cotton fibers during extended enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 93, 443-456. (Pubitemid 43232171)
25. Wang, Y., Zhao, Y. A., & Deng, Y. (2008). Effect of enzymatic treatment on cotton fiber dissolution in NaOH/urea solution at cold temperature. Carbohydrate Polymers, 72, 178-184.
26. Yang, H., Yan, R., Chen, H., Lee, D. H., Liang, D. T., & Zheng, C. (2006). Pyrolysis of palm oil wastes for enhanced production of hydrogen rich gases. Fuel Processing Technology, 87, 935-942. (Pubitemid 44428078)
27. Zhang, Q. Z., & Cai, W. M. (2008). Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biomass and Bioenergy, 32(12), 1130-1135. 357.
28. Zhang, Y. L. P., & Lynd, L. R. (2004). Enzymatic hydrolysis of alkali-pretreated rice straw by Trichoderma reesei ZM4-F3. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 88, 797-824.