From chemical platform molecules to new biosolvents: Design engineering as a substitution methodology

Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 438-451

  Bergez Lacoste, Manon ^a   Thiebaud Roux, Sophie ^a   De Caro, Pascale ^a   Fabre, Jean François ^a   Gerbaud, Vincent ^b   Mouloungui, Zéphirin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

Author keywords

Biosolvents; Furfural; Reverse design; Substitution methodologies

Indexed keywords

ACETONE; ALDEHYDES; DESIGN; EPOXY RESINS; FURFURAL; SPECIFICATIONS;

BIOSOLVENTS; COMPUTER AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN; ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTIC; INNOVATIVE METHODOLOGIES; REVERSE DESIGNS; STRUCTURES AND PROPERTIES; TRIAL-AND-ERROR APPROACH; VIRTUAL LABORATORIES;

MOLECULES;

EID: 84899953020     PISSN: 1932104X     EISSN: 19321031     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1480     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. De Caro P and Thiebaud-Roux S, Biosolvants. Techniques de l'Ingénieur IN 102:1-9 (2008).
2. Jessop PG, Searching for green solvents. Green Chem 13:1391-1398 (2011).
3. Sheldon RA, Green solvents for sustainable organic synthesis: State of the art. Green Chem 7:267-278 (2005).
4. DeSimone JM, Practical approaches to green solvents. Science 297:799-803 (2002).
5. Bandres M, de Caro P, Thiebaud-Roux S and Borredon ME, Green syntheses of biobased solvents. C R Chimie 14:636-646 (2011).
6. Anastas PT and Warner JC, Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, New York, USA (2000).
7. Kamlet MJ and Taft RW, The solvatochromic comparison method. I. The β-scale of solvent hydrogen-bond acceptor (HBA) basicities. J Am Chem Soc 98:377-383 (1976).
8. Kamlet MJ, Abboud JL and Taft RW, The solvatochromic comparison method. 6. The π* scale of solvent polarities. J Am Chem Soc 99:6027-6038 (1977).
9. Kamlet MJ, Abboud JLM, Abraham MH and Taft RW, Linear solvation energy relationships. 23. A comprehensive collection of the solvatochromic parameters, π*, α, and β, and some methods for simplifying the generalized solvatochromic equation. J Org Chem 48:2877-2887 (1983).
10. Jessop PG, Jessop DA, Fu D and Phan L, Solvatochromic parameters for solvents of interest in green chemistry. Green Chem 14:1245-1259 (2012).
11. Hildebrand JH and Scott RL, The solubility of Non-Electrolytes, 3rd ed., Reinhold Publishing Co., New York (1950).
12. Durand M, Molinier V, Kunz W and Aubry J-M, Classification of organic solvents revisited by using the COSMO-RS approach. Chemistry 17:5155-5164 (2011).
13. Moity L, Durand M, Benazzouz A, Pierlot C, Molinier V and Aubry J-M, Panorama of sustainable solvents using the COSMO-RS approach. Green Chem 14:1132-1145 (2012).
14. Eissen M and Metzger JO, Environmental performance metrics for daily use in synthetic chemistry. Chemistry 8:3580-3585 (2002).
15. Filskov P, Goldschmidt G, Hansen MK, Höglund JL, Johansen T, Pedersen CL and Wibroe L, Substitutes for Hazardous Chemicals in the Workplace. CRC Press Inc., Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL (1996):
16. Goldschmidt G, An analytical approach for reducing workplace hazards through substitution. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 54:36-43 (1993).
17. HSE, 7 Steps to Succesful Substitution of Hazardous Substances. United Kingdom Health and Safety Executive, HSE Books, Sudbury, Suffolk, UK (1994).
18. Callahan MS and Green B, Hazardous Solvent Source Reduction. McGraw-Hill, NY (1995).
19. Cornstubble DR, CAGE 1.0 - Coating Alternatives Guide - User's Guide. Research Triangle Institute and united States Environmental Protection Agency, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division, Research Triangle Park, NC (1996).
20. Monroe KR and Hill EA, Solvent Alternatives Guides (SAGE), Computer assisted guidance for solvent replacement. CFC and Halon Alternatives Conference - Stratospheric Ozone Protection for the 90s, Washington, October 20-22 (1993).
21. Bégin D and Gérin M, Substitution des Solvants. Etude de cas d'implantation. Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et Sécurité du Travail, Montréal (2001).
22. Bégin D and Gérin M, La substitution des solvants par le lactate d'éthyle, in Bilans de connaissances, Université de Montréal (IRSST), Montréal (2005).
23. Moity L, Molinier V, Benazzouz A, Barone R, Marion P and Aubry J-M, In silico design of bio-based commodity chemicals: Application to itaconic acid based solvents. Green Chem 16:146-160 (2014).
24. Marrero J and Gani R, Group-contribution based estimation of pure component properties. Fluid Phase Equilibr 183/184:183-208 (2001).
25. Reid RC, Prausnitz JM and Poling BE, The Properties of Gases and Liquids, Chapter 2. McGraw-Hill Inc., NY (1987).
26. Gold PI and Ogle GJ, Estimating thermophysical properties of liquids. Part 4 - Boiling, freezing and triple-point temperatures. Chem Eng 76:119-122 (1969).
27. Joback KG and Reid RC, Estimation of pure-component properties from group-contributions. Chem Eng Commun 57:233-243 (1987).
28. Stein SE and Brown RL, Estimation of normal boiling points from group contributions. J Chem Inf Comp Sci 34:581-587 (1994).
29. Advanced Chemistry Development (ACD/Labs), Software V11.02 (© 1994-2013 ACD/Labs). [Online]. ACD/Labs Percepta Predictors. Available at: http://www.acdlabs.com/products/percepta/predictors.php [September 26, 2013].
30. Hilal SH, Karickhoff SW and Carreira LA, Prediction of the vapor pressure boiling point, heat of vaporization and diffusion coefficient of organic compounds. QSAR CombSci 22:565-574 (2003).
31. Catoire L, Paulmier S and Naudet V, Estimation of closed cup flash points of combustible solvent blends. J Phys Chem 35:9-14 (2006).
32. Yamamoto H. [Online]. About the Pirika.com. Available at: http://pirika.com/ [September 26, 2013].
33. Riedel L, Eine neue universelle admpfdruckformel untersuchungen über eine Erweiterung des Theorems der übereinstimmenden Zustände. Teil I. Chem-Ing-Tech 26:83-89 (1954).
34. Lyman WJ, Reehl WF and Rosenblatt DH, Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods. American Chemical Society, Washington DC (1990),
35. Lyman WJ, Environmental Exposure From Chemicals, Volume I, ed by Neely WB and Blau GE. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (1985).
36. Yamada T and Gunn RD, Saturated liquid molar volumes. Rackett equation. J Chem Eng Data 18:234-236 (1973).
37. Yen LC and Woods SS, A generalized equation for computer calculation of liquid densities. AIChE J 12:95-99 (1966).
38. Hilal SH, Saravanaraj AN, Whiteside T and Carreira LA, Calculating physical properties of organic compounds for environmental modeling from molecular structure. J Comput-Aid Mol Des 21:693-708 (2007).
39. Hukkerikar AS, Sarup B, Ten Kate A, Abildskov J, Sin GR and Gani R, Group-contribution+(GC+) based estimation of properties of pure components: Improved property estimation and uncertainty analysis. Fluid Phase Equilibr 321:25-43 (2012).
40. Marrero J and Gani R, Group-contribution-based estimation of octanol/water partition coefficient and aqueous solubility. Ind Eng Chem Res 41:6623-6633 (2002).
41. Meylan WM, Howard PH and Boethling RS, Improved method for estimating water solubility from octanol/water partition coefficient. Environ Toxicol Chem 15:100-106 (1996).
42. Meylan WM and Howard PH, Validation of Water Solubility Estimation Methods Using Log Kow for Application in PCGEMS & EPI. Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Science Center, Washington DC (1994).
43. Hilal SH, Karickhoff SW and Carreira LA, Prediction of the solubility, activity coefficient and liquid/liquid partition coefficient of organic compounds. QSAR Comb Sci 23:709-720 (2004).
44. Conte E, Martinho A, Matos HA and Gani R, Combined group-contribution and atom connectivity index-based methods for estimation of surface tension and viscosity. Ind Eng Chem Res 47:7940-7954 (2008).
45. Meylan WM and Howard PH, Computer estimation of the atmospheric gas-phase reaction rate of organic compounds with hydroxyl radicals and ozone. Chemosphere 26:2293-2299 (1993).
46. Boethling RS, Howard PH, Meylan W, Stiteler W, Beauman J and Tirado N, Group contribution method for predicting probability and rate of aerobic biodegradation. Environ Sci Technol 28:459-465 (1994).
47. Meylan WM, Howard PH, Boethling RS, Aronson D, Printup H and Gouchie S, Improved method for estimating bioconcentration/bioaccumulation factor from octanol/water partition coefficient. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:664-672 (1999).
48. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). [Online]. Ecological Structure Activity Relationships (ECOSAR). Available at: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/newchems/tools/21ecosar.htm [September 27, 2013].
49. Meylan WM and Howard PH, Estimating octanol-air partition coefficients with octanol-water partition coefficients and Henry's law constants. Chemosphere 61:640-644 ( 2005).
50. Martin TM and Young DM, Prediction of the acute toxicity (96-h LC50) of organic compounds to the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) using a group contribution method. Chem Res Toxicol 14:1378-1385 (2001).
51. Patlewicz G, Jeliazkova N, Safford RJ, Worth AP and Aleksiev B, An evaluation of the implementation of the Cramer classification scheme in the Toxtree software. SAR QSAR Environ Res 19:495-524 (2008).
52. Veith GD and Konasewich DE, Structure-activity correlations in studies of toxicity and bioconcentration with aquatic organisms. Great Lakes research advisory Board, Windsor, Ontario (1975)
53. Dimitrov S, Dimitrova N, Parkerton T, Comber M, Bonnell M and Mekenyan O, Base-line model for identifying the bioaccumulation potential of chemicals. SAR QSAR Environ Res 16:531-554 (2005).
54. Cassano A, Manganaro A, Martin T, Young D, Piclin N, Pintore M et al., CAESAR models for developmental toxicity. Chem Cent J 4:S4 (2010).
55. Gerberick GF, Ryan CA and Kern PS, Compilation of historical local lymph node data for evaluation of skin sensitization alternative methods. Dermatitis 16:157-202 (2005).
56. Ferrari T and Gini G, An open source multistep model to predict mutagenicity from statistical analysis and relevant structural alerts. Chem Cent J 4:S2 (2010).
57. Fjodorova N, Vracko M, Novic M, Roncaglioni A and Benfenati E, New public QSAR model for carcinogenicity. Chem Cent J 4:S3 (2010).
58. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). [Online]. SPARC Performs Automated Reasoning in Chemistry. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/athens/research/sparc.html [September 26, 2013].
59. Heintz J, Belaud J-P and Gerbaud V, Chemical enterprise model and decision-making framework for sustainable chemical product design. Computers in Industry 65:505-520 (2014).
60. Abbott S, Hansen CM and Yamamoto H. [Online]. The Official Hansen Solubility Parameter Site. Available at: http://www.hansen-solubility.com [September 26, 2013].
61. SPARC. [Online]. SPARC Performs Automated Reasoning in Chemistry. Available at: https://archemcalc.com/sparc/ [September 26, 2013].
62. PBT profiler, a component of OPPT's P2 Framework, assessing chemical in the absence of data. [Online]. Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic Profiles Estimated for Organic Chemicals. Available at: http://www.pbtprofiler.net/default.asp [September 26, 2013].
63. Computer Assisted Evaluation of Industrial Chemical Substances According to Regulations (CAESAR). [Online]. Available at: http://www.caesar-project.eu/ [September 26, 2013].
64. Song J and Song HH, Computer-aided molecular design of environmentally friendly solvents for separation processes. Chem Eng Technol 31:177-187 (2008).
65. Sherman J, Chin B, Huibers PDT, Garcia-Valls R and Hatton TA, Solvent replacement for green processing. Environ Health Persp 106:253-271 (1998).
66. Sinha M, Achenie LEK and Ostrovsky GM, Environmentally begnin solvent design by global optimization. Comput Chem Eng 23:1381-1394 (1999).
67. Constantinou L, Bagherpour K, Gani R, Klein JA and Wu DT, Computer aided product design: Problem formulations, methodology and applications. Comput Chem Eng 20:685-702 (1996).
68. Maranas CD, Optimization accounting for property prediction uncertainty in polymer design. Comput Chem Eng 21:S1019-S1024 (1997).
69. Heintz J, Systemic approach and decision process for sustainability in chemical engineering: Application to computer aided product design, PhD thesis. Laboratoire de Génie Chimique, Toulouse. (2012)
70. Capello C, Fischer U and Hungerbuhler K, What is a green solvent? A comprehensive framework for the environmental assessment of solvents. Green Chem 9:927-934 (2007).
71. Andraos J, Unification of reaction metrics for green chemistry II: Evaluation of named organic reactions and application to reaction discovery. Org Process Res Dev 9:404-431 (2005).
72. Constable DJC, Curzons AD and Cunningham VL, Metrics to 'green' chemistry-which are the best? Green Chem 4:521-527 (2002).
73. 2. J Supercrit Fluid 38:13-17 (2006).
74. Medina Gonzalez Y, de Caro P, Thiebaud-Roux S and Lacaze-Dufaure C, Fatty acid methyl esters as biosolvents of epoxy resins: A physicochemical study. J Solution Chem 36:437-446 (2007).
75. Hoydonckx HE, Van Rhijn WM, Van Rhijn W, De Vos DE and Jacobs PA, Furfural and Derivatives, in Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim (2007).
76. Mamman AS, Lee JM, Kim YC, Hwang IT, Park NJ, Hwang YK et al., Furfural: Hemicellulose/xylosederived biochemical. Biofuel Bioprod Bioref 2:438-454 (2008).
77. Heintz J, Touche I., Teles dos Santos M and Gerbaud V, An integrated framework for product formulation by computer aided mixture design. Comput-Aided Chem Eng 30:702-706 (2012).