A robotic test of proprioception within the hemiparetic arm post-stroke

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Simo, Lucia ^a,b,c   Botzer, Lior ^d   Ghez, Claude ^e   Scheidt, Robert A ^b,c,d,f  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^d Marquette University   (United States)

^e New York Presbyterian Columbia University Medical Center   (United States)

^f MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Detection; Displacement; Force; Proprioception; Stroke; Threshold; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMNESIA; ARM; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY TONE DISCRIMINATION TASK; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPETENCE; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FORCED CHOICE METHOD; HEMIPARETIC STROKE; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL TASK; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; ROBOTICS; SIGNAL DETECTION; SPASTICITY; EQUIPMENT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; PARESIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; ARM; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; PARESIS; PROPRIOCEPTION; ROBOTICS; STROKE;

EID: 84899918968     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-77     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Somatosensory loss after stroke. Carey LM, Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med 1995 7 51 95
2. Somatosensory impairment after stroke: frequency of different deficits and their recovery. Connell LA, Lincoln NB, Radford KA, Clin Rehabil 2008 22 758 767 10.1177/0269215508090674 18678576
3. Frequency of discriminative sensory loss in the hand after stroke in a rehabilitation setting. Carey LM, Matyas TA, J Rehabil Med 2011 43 257 263 10.2340/16501977-0662 21305243
4. Proprioceptive feedback and movement regulation. Prochazka A, Handbook of Physiology. Section12 New York: Oxford 1996 89 127
5. Congenitally blind individuals rapidly adapt to Coriolis force perturbations of their reaching movements. Dizio P, Lackner JR, J Neurophysiol 2000 84 2175 2180 11024106
6. Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception. Sainburg RL, Ghilardi MF, Poizner H, Ghez C, J Neurophysiol 1995 73 820 835 7760137
7. The roles of vision and proprioception in the planning of reaching movements. Sarlegna FR, Sainburg RL, Prog Mot Contr 2009 629 317 335 10.1007/978-0-387-77064-2-16
8. Multisensory integration during motor planning. Sober S, Sabes P, J Neurosci 2003 23 6982 6992 12904459 (Pubitemid 36975864)
9. Neural and electromyographic correlates of wrist posture control. Suminski AJ, Rao SM, Mosier KM, Scheidt RA, J Neurophysiol 2007 97 1527 1545 17135464 (Pubitemid 46239526)
10. Reach and final position control amid environmental uncertainty after stroke. Scheidt RA, Stoeckmann T, J Neurophysiol 2007 97 2824 2836 10.1152/jn.00870.2006 17267755 (Pubitemid 46557714)
11. Reliability of two-point discrimination measurements. Dellon AL, Mackinon SE, Crosby PM, J Hand Surg [Am] 1987 12 693 696 10.1016/S0363-5023(87)80049-7 3655225
12. The unreliability of sensory assessments. Lincoln NB, Crow JL, Jackson JM, Waters GR, Adams SA, Hodgson P, Clin Rehabil 1991 5 272 282
13. Reliability and revision of the Nottingham Sensory Assessment for stroke patients. Lincoln NB, Jackson JM, Adams SA, Physiotherapy 1998 84 358 365 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61454-X (Pubitemid 28401372)
14. Impaired limb position sense after stroke: a quantitative test for clinical use. Carey LM, Oke LE, Matyas TA, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996 77 1271 1278 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90192-6 8976311 (Pubitemid 26424841)
15. Evaluation of impaired fingertip texture discrimination and writs position sense in patients affected by stroke: comparison of clinical and new quantitative measure. Carey LM, Matyas TA, Oke LE, J Hand Ther 2002 15 71 82 10.1053/hanthe.2002.v15.01571 11866355 (Pubitemid 34141910)
16. The Rivermead Assessment of Somatosensory Performance (RASP): standardization and reliability data. Winward CE, Halligan PW, Wade DT, Clin Rehabil 2002 16 523 533 10.1191/0269215502cr522oa 12194623
17. Quantitative assessment of limb position sense following stroke. Dukelow SP, Herter TM, Moore KD, Demers MJ, Glasgow JI, Bagg SD, Norman KE, Scott SH, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009 24 178 187 19794134
18. Squeri V, Zenzari J, Morasso P, Basteris A, Giannoni P, Integrating proprioceptive assessment with proprioceptive training of stroke patients 2011 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 1-6), IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICORR.2011.5975500
19. Relationship among shoulder proprioception, kinematics, and pain after stroke. Niessen MH, Veeger DH, Meskers CG, Koppe PA, Konijnenbelt MH, Janssen TW, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009 90 1557 1564 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.04.004 19735784
20. Automated measurement of proprioception following stroke. Leibowitz N, Levy N, Weingarten S, Grinberg Y, Karniel A, Sacher Y, Serfaty C, Soroker N, Disabil Rehab 2008 30 1829 1836 10.1080/09638280701640145
21. Visual, motor and attentional influences on proprioceptive contributions to perception of hand path rectilinearity during reaching. Scheidt RA, Lillis KP, Emerson SJ, Exp Brain Res 2010 204 239 254 10.1007/s00221-010-2308-1 20532489
22. BiVABA test manual. Warren M, [ http://www.visabilities.com/bivaba.html ]
23. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Fugl-Meyer A, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S, Scand J Rehab Med 1975 7 13 31
24. How do strength, sensation, spasticity and joint individuation relate to the reaching deficits with chronic hemiparesis? Zackowski KM, Dromerick AW, Sahrmann SA, Thach WT, Bastian AJ, Brain 2004 127 1035 1046 10.1093/brain/awh116 14976070 (Pubitemid 38623040)
25. DeGowin EL, DeGowin RL, DeGowin & DeGowin's bedside diagnostic examination New York, NY: Collier Macmillan Ltd 5 1987
26. Epstein O, Perkin GD, Cookson J, de Bono DP, Clinical examination London: Mosby 2004
27. Recovery of somatosensory deficits in acute stroke. Julkunen L, Tenovou O, Jaaskelainen SK, Hamalainen H, Acta Neurol Scand 2005 111 366 372 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00393.x 15876337 (Pubitemid 40705306)
28. Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements. Scheidt RA, Conditt MA, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, J Neurophysiol 2000 84 853 862 10938312 (Pubitemid 30655608)
29. Gescheider GA, Psychophysics: The fundamentals Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc: Mahwah New Jersey 1997
30. Wickens TD, Elementary signal detection theory New York: Oxford University Press 2002
31. Loss of somatic sensation. Carey LM, Textbook of neural repair and rehabilitation Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press 2006 2 231 247
32. The independence of deficits in position sense and visually guided reaching following stroke. Dukelow SP, Herter TM, Bagg SD, Scott SH, J NeuroEng Rehab 2012 9 72 10.1186/1743-0003-9-72
33. Psychometric properties of the sensory scale of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment in stroke patients. Lin JH, Hsueh IP, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL, Clinical Rehab 2004 18 391 397 10.1191/0269215504cr737oa (Pubitemid 38697072)
34. Kinematic alterations in the ipsilateral shoulder of patients with hemiplegia due to stroke. Meskers CG, Koppe PA, Konijnenbelt MH, Veeger DH, Janssen TW, Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005 84 97 105 10.1097/01.PHM.0000150792. 26793.E9 15668557
35. Proprioception of the shoulder after stroke. Niessen MH, Veeger DH, Meskers CG, Koppe PA, Konijnenbelt MH, van Dieen J, Janssen TW, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008 89 333 338 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.157 18226659
36. Elastic, viscous, and mass load effects on post-stroke muscle recruitment and cocontraction during reaching: A pilot study. Stoeckmann T, Sullivan K, Scheidt RA, Phys Ther 2009 89 1 14 10.2522/ptj.20070306.ic
37. Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination. Sainburg RL, Poizner H, Ghez C, J Neurophysiol 1993 70 2136 2147 8294975 (Pubitemid 23351049)
38. Proprioceptive control of interjoint coordination. Ghez C, Sainburg R, Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1995 73 273 284 10.1139/y95-038 7621366
39. Dependent of dynamic response of spindle receptors on muscle length and velocity. Houk JC, Rymer WZ, Crago PE, J Neurophysiol 1981 46 143 166 6455505 (Pubitemid 11040024)
40. Models of ensemble firing of muscle spindle afferents recorded during normal locomotion in cats. Prochazka A, Gorassini M, J Physiol 1998 507 277 291 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.277bu.x 9490851 (Pubitemid 28102692)
41. Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A, Stroke 2001 32 1635 1639 10.1161/01.STR.32.7.1635 11441212 (Pubitemid 32631916)
42. Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Vignolo M, McCulloch K, Stroke 2005 36 2493 2496 10.1161/01.STR.0000185928.90848.2e 16224078 (Pubitemid 41566986)
43. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P, Floel A, Wu W-H, Gerloff C, Cohen LG, Brain 2005 128 490 499 10.1093/brain/awh369 15634731 (Pubitemid 40380185)
44. Influence of electric somatosensory stimulation on paretic-hand function in chronic stroke. Wu CW, Seo HJ, Cohen LG, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006 87 351 357 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.11.019 16500168 (Pubitemid 43286943)
45. Deficits of sensorimotor control and their impact on limb stabilization post-stroke: a case series. Translational and computational Motor Control (TCMC). Mrotek LA, Stoeckmann T, Bengtson M, Ghez C, Scheidt RA, Am Soc NeuroRehabil 2013 P8 1 2
46. Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems. Kaczmarek KA, Webster JG, Bach-Y-Rita P, Tompkins WJ, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1991 38 1 16 10.1109/10.68204 2026426
47. Effects of wrist tendon vibration on targeted upper arm movements in post-stroke hemiparesis. Conrad M, Scheidt RA, Schmit BD, Neurorehab Neural Repair 2010 25 61 70