A new scenario framework for climate change research: The concept of shared climate policy assumptions

Climatic Change

Volumn 122, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 401-414

  Kriegler, Elmar ^a   Edmonds, Jae ^b   Hallegatte, Stéphane ^c   Ebi, Kristie L ^d   Kram, Tom ^e   Riahi, Keywan ^f   Winkler, Harald ^g   van Vuuren, Detlef P ^e,h  

^a POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c WORLD BANK   (United States)

^d ClimAdapt   (United States)

^e PBL NETHERLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY   (Netherlands)

^f INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS   (Austria)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

^h UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE MODELS;

CLIMATE CHANGE SCENARIOS; CLIMATE IMPACTS; CLIMATE POLICY; KEY POLICIES; MATRIX ARCHITECTURE;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

EID: 84899906377     PISSN: 01650009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-013-0971-5     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Babiker MH, Eckaus RS (2007) Unemployment effects of climate policy. Environ Sci Policy 10(7-8):600-609
2. Blanford G, Kriegler E, Tavoni M (2014) Harmonization vs. Fragmentation: overview of climate policy scenarios in EMF27. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0951-9
3. Calvin K, Clarke L, Krey V, Blanford G, Jiang K, Kainuma M, Kriegler E, Luderer G, Shukla PR (2012) The role of Asia in mitigating climate change: results from the Asia modeling exercise. Energy Econ 34(Supplement 3):S251-S260
4. Calvin K, Wise M, Kyle P, Patel P, Clarke L, Edmonds J (2014) Trade-offs of different land and bioenergy policies on the path to achieving climate targets. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0897-y
5. Clapp C, Ellis J, Benn J, Corfee-Morlot J (2012) Tracking climate finance: What and how? Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. http://www.oecd.org/env/climatechange/50293494.pdf
6. Clarke L, Edmonds J, Krey V, Richels R, Rose S, Tavoni M (2009) International climate policy architectures: overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios. Energy Econ 31:S64-S81
7. Ebi et al (2014) A new scenario framework for climate change research: background, process, and future directions. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0912-3
8. Guivarch C, Crassous R, Sassi O, Hallegatte S (2011) The costs of climate policies in a second best world with labour market imperfections. Clim Pol 11:768-788
9. Hallegatte S, Przyluski V, Vogt-Schilb A (2011) Building world narratives for climate change impact, adaptation and vulnerability analyses. Nat Clim Chang 1(3):151-155. doi:10.1038/nclimate1135
10. Knopf B, Luderer G, Edenhofer O (2011) Exploring the feasibility of low stabilization targets. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 2(4):617-626
11. Kriegler E, O'Neill BC, Hallegatte S, Kram T, Lempert R, Moss R, Wilbanks T (2012) The need for and use of socio-economic scenarios for climate change analysis: a new approach based on shared socioeconomic pathways. Glob Environ Chang 22:807-822
12. Kriegler E et al (2014a) The role of technology for climate stabilization: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0953-7
13. Kriegler E et al (2014b) Making or breaking climate targets: the AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.021
14. Linnér BO, Mickwitz P, Román M (2012) Reducing greenhouse gas emissions through development policies: a framework for analysing policy interventions. Clim Dev 4(3):175-186. doi:10.1080/17565529.2012.698587
15. Luderer G, Bertram C, Calvin K, De Cian E, Kriegler E (2014) Implications of weak near-term climate policies on long-term mitigation pathways. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0899-9
16. McCollum DL, Krey V, Riahi K (2011) An integrated approach to energy sustainability. Nat Clim Chang 1:428-429
17. Morgan MG, Keith DW (2008) Improving the way we think about projecting future energy use and emissions of carbon dioxide. Clim Chang 90:189-215
18. Moss RH et al (2008) Towards new scenarios for analysis of emissions, climate change, impacts, and response strategies. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, 132 pp
19. Moss RH et al (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463:747-756
20. Nakicenovic N et al (2000) IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
21. O'Neill BC et al (2014) A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic reference pathways. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2
22. Parson EA (2008) Useful global change scenarios: current issues and challenges. Environ Res Lett 3, 045016
23. RiahiKet al (2014) Locked into copenhagen pledges-implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.016
24. Tavoni M et al (2014) The distribution of the major economies' effort in the Durban platform scenarios. Clim Chang Econ 4(4):1340009
25. van Vuuren DP et al (2011) The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Chang 109:5-31
26. van Vuuren DP, Riahi K, Moss R, Edmonds J, Thomson A, Nakicenovic N, Kram T, Berkhout F, Swart R, Janetos A, Rose SK, Arnell N (2012) A proposal for a new scenario framework to support research and assessment in different climate research communities. Glob Environ Chang 22:21-35
27. van Vuuren DP et al (2014) A new scenario framework for climate change research: scenario matrix architecture. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0906-1
28. Winkler H, Höhne N, Den Elzen M (2008) Methods for quantifying the benefits of sustainable development policies and measures (SD-PAMs). Clim Pol 8(2):119-134
29. Winkler H, Vorster S, Marquard A (2009) Who picks up the remainder? Mitigation in developed and developing countries. Clim Pol 9(6):634-651