The impact of funding through the RF president's grants for young scientists (the field - Medicine) on research productivity: A quasi-experimental study and a brief systematic review

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Saygitov, Ruslan T ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPETITION; FUNDING; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ONCOLOGY; PUBLICATION; QUASI EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SCIENTIST; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

ADULT; BIBLIOMETRICS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; EFFICIENCY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; RUSSIA; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 84899898321     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086969     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Chudnovsky D, López A, Rossi M, Ubfal D (2006) Evaluating a program of public funding of scientific activity: A case study of FONCYT in Argentina. Working Paper: OVE/WP-12/06. Available: http://idbdocs.iadb.org/ wsdocs/getdocument.aspx?docnum=907636. Accessed 23 January 2013.
2. Böhmer S, Hornbostel S, Meuser M (2008) Postdocs in Deutschland: Evaluation des Emmy Noether-Programms. iFQ - Working Paper No. 3. Available: http://www.forschungsinfo.de/Publikationen/Download/working-paper-3-2008.pdf. Accessed 18 March 2013.
3. Bornmann L, Leydesdorff L, Van den Besselaar P (2010) A meta-evaluation of scientific research proposals: Different ways of comparing rejected to awarded applications. J Informetrics 4(3): 211-220.
4. Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation (2010) Forskningsrådenes virkemidler til fremme af karriere. Evaluering af forskningsrådenes støtte til kvindelige forskere og forskere i begyndelsen af deres karriereforløb. Available: http://fivu.dk/ publikationer/2010/forskningsradenes-virkemidler-til-fremme-af-karriere. Accessed 6 May 2013.
5. Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation (2011) Evaluering af virkemidlet "forskningsprojekter" i Det Frie Forskningsråd. Available: http:// fivu.dk/publikationer/2011/evaluering-af-virkemidlet- forskningsprojekter-2011. Accessed 26 January 2013.
6. Jacob BA, Lefgren L (2011) The impact of NIH Postdoctoral Training Grants on scientific productivity. Res Policy 40(6): 864-874.
7. Jacob BA, Lefgren L (2011) The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity. J Public Econ 95(9-10): 1168-1177.
8. Melin G, Danell R (2006) The top eight percent: Development of approved and rejected applicants for a prestigious grant in Sweden. Science and Public Policy 33 (10): 702-712. (Pubitemid 46394734)
9. Arora A, Gambardella A (2005) The impact of NSF Support for basic research in economics. Annales d'Economie et de Statistique 79-80: 91-117.
10. Langfeldt L, Ramberg I, Sivertsen G, Bloch C, Olsen SD (2012) Evaluation of the Norwegian scheme for independent research projects (FRIPRO). Oslo, Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education (NIFU), Report 8/2012. 2012. Available: http://www.uib.no/filearchive/evaluationoffripro- nifureport82012-10april2012.pdf. Accessed 26 January 2013.
11. Ida T., Fukuzawa N (2013) Effects of large-scale research funding programs: a Japanese case study. Scientometrics 94(3): 1253-1273.
12. Hottenrott H, Thorwarth S (2011) Industry funding of university research and scientific productivity. ZEW Discussion Papers 10-105. Center for European Economic Research. Available: ftp://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp10105.pdf. Accessed 5 December 2013.
13. Dezhina I, Graham LR (2005) Science foundations: a novelty in Russian science. Science 310(5755): 1772-1773. (Pubitemid 41814368)
14. LaLonde JR (1986) Evaluating the econometric evaluations of training programs with experimental data. Am Econ Rev 76(4): 604-620.
15. Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R, Sowden AJ, Sakarovitch C, et al (2003) Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 7(27): 1-173.
16. MacLehose RR, Reeves BC, Harvey IM, Sheldon TA, Russell IT, et al. (1999) A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies. Health Technol Assess 4(34): 1-154.
17. Marulis LM, Neuman SB (2010) The effects of vocabulary intervention on young children's word learning: a meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res80(3): 300-335.
18. Mahoney MC, Verma P, Morantz S (2007) Research productivity among recipients of AAFP foundation grants. Ann Fam Med 5(2): 143-145. (Pubitemid 46513483)
19. Hall B, Mairesse J, Turner L (2007) Identifying age, cohort, and period effects in scientific research productivity: discussion and illustration using simulated and actual data on French physicists. Econ Innov New Techn 16(2): 159-177.
20. Gonzalez-Brambila C., Veloso F (2007) The determinants of research productivity: a study of Mexican researchers Department of Engineering and Public Policy. Paper 133. Available: http://repository.cmu.edu/epp/133. Accessed 8 February 2013.
21. Gingras Y, Larivière V, Macaluso B, Robitaille JP (2008) The effects of aging on researchers' publication and citation patterns. PLoS One 3(12): e4048. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004048.
22. Gelfand M (2010) Search in the Russian Science Citation Index on one's pat! Troitsky Variant [Russian] 58: 4-5 [Gel'fand M. Provedite poisk v RINTS samostoyatel'no!]. Available: http://trv-science.ru/2010/07/20/provedite-poisk- v-rinc-samostoyatelno. Accessed 7 November 2012.
23. Gelfand M (2011) From "Stern lists" to map of Russian science. Troitsky Variant [Russian] 72: 4-5 [Gel'fand M. Ot «spiskov Shterna» - k karte rossiyskoy nauki]. Available: http://trv-science.ru/2011/02/15/ot- spiskov-shterna-k-karte-rossijskoj-nauki. Accessed 6 November 2012.
24. Sterne JAC, Jüni P, Schulz KF, Altman DG, Bartlett C, et al (2002) Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research. Stat Med 21: 1513-1524. (Pubitemid 34746060)