Individual differences in risk-related behaviors and voluntary alcohol intake in outbred Wistar rats

Behavioural Pharmacology

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 206-215

  Momeni, Shima ^a   Sharif, Mana ^a   Ågren, Greta ^a   Roman, Erika ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

anxiety; decision making; ethanol; impulsivity; intermittent access; multivariate concentric square field; open field; risk assessment; risk taking

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLUID INTAKE; FOOD PREFERENCE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; ILLUMINATION; MALE; NONHUMAN; OPEN FIELD BEHAVIOR; OPEN FIELD TEST; RAT; RISK ASSESSMENT; ANIMAL; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; INDIVIDUALITY; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; WISTAR RAT;

ALCOHOL DRINKING; ANIMALS; ETHANOL; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; RISK-TAKING;

EID: 84899882642     PISSN: 09558810     EISSN: 14735849     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000036     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adermark L, Jonsson S, Ericson M, Sö derpalm B (2011). Intermittent ethanolconsumption depresses endocannabinoid-signaling in the dorsolateralstriatum of rat. Neuropharmacology 61:1160-1165.
2. Atkins AL, Rustay NR, Crabbe JC (2000). Anxiety and sensitivity to ethanol andpentobarbital in alcohol withdrawal seizure-prone and withdrawal seizureresistantmice. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 24:1743-1749.
3. Augustsson H, Meyerson BJ (2004). Exploration and risk assessment:a comparative study of male house mice (Mus musculus musculus) andtwo laboratory strains. Physiol Behav 81:685-698.
4. Balogh KN, Mayes LC, Potenza MN (2013). Risk-taking and decision-making inyouth: relationships to addiction vulnerability. J Behav Addict 2:1-9.
5. Bardo MT, Donohew RL, Harrington NG (1996). Psychobiology of noveltyseeking and drug seeking behavior. Behav Brain Res 77:23-43.
6. Barson JR, Fagan SE, Chang GQ, Leibowitz SF (2013). Neurochemicalheterogeneity of rats predicted by different measures to be high ethanolconsumers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 37 (Suppl 1):E141-E151.
7. Blanchard RJ, Blanchard DC, Hori K (1989). An ethoexperimental approach tothe study of defense. In: Blanchard RJ, Brain PF, Blanchard DC, Parmigiani S,editors. Ethoexperimental approaches to the study of behavior. Dordrecht,The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 114-136.
8. Blanchard RJ, Magee L, Veniegas R, Blanchard DC (1993). Alcohol and anxiety:ethopharmacological approaches. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry17:171-182.
9. Blanchard MM, Mendelsohn D, Stamp JA (2009). The HR/LR model: furtherevidence as an animal model of sensation seeking. Neurosci Biobehav Rev33:1145-1154.
10. Blednov YA, Mayfield RD, Belknap J, Harris RA (2012). Behavioral actions ofalcohol: phenotypic relations from multivariate analysis of mutant mouse data.Genes Brain Behav 11:424-435.
11. Cain ME, Saucier DA, Bardo MT (2005). Novelty seeking and drug use:contribution of an animal model. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 13:367-375.
12. Carobrez AP, Bertoglio L J (2005). Ethological and temporal analyses of anxietylikebehavior: the elevated plus-maze model 20 years on. Neurosci BiobehavRev 29:1193-1205.
13. Choleris E, Thomas AW, Kavaliers M, Prato FS (2001). A detailed ethologicalanalysis of the mouse open field test: effects of diazepam, chlordiazepoxideand an extremely low frequency pulsed magnetic field. Neurosci BiobehavRev 25:235-260.
14. Daoura L, Haaker J, Nylander I (2011). Early environmental factors differentiallyaffect voluntary ethanol consumption in adolescent and adult male rats.Alcohol Clin Exp Res 35:506-515.
15. Davis J.F.,Krause E.G.,Melhorn S.J.,Sakai R.R.,Benoit S.C.,Dominant rats arenatural risk takers and display increased motivation for food reward., Neuroscience, 2009, 162,23-30.
16. Davis JF, Krause EG, Melhorn SJ, Sakai RR, Benoit SC (2009). Dominant rats arenatural risk takers and display increased motivation for food reward.Neuroscience 162:23-30.De Bellis MD (2002). Developmental traumatology: a contributory mechanism foralcohol and substance use disorders. Psychoneuroendocrinology 27:155-170.
17. Dellu F, Piazza PV, Mayo W, Le Moal M, Simon H (1996). Novelty-seeking in rats-biobehavioral characteristics and possible relationship with the sensationseekingtrait in man. Neuropsychobiology 34:136-145.
18. Goepfrich AA, Gluch C, Friemel CM, Schneider M (2013). Behavioral differencesin three Wistar Han rat lines for emotional reactivity, cognitive processing andethanol intake. Physiol Behav 110-111:102-108.
19. Gustafsson L, Nylander I (2006). Time-dependent alterations in ethanol intake inmale Wistar rats exposed to short and prolonged daily maternal separation ina 4-bottle free-choice paradigm. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 30:2008-2016.
20. Hasin D, Kilcoyne B (2012). Comorbidity of psychiatric and substance usedisorders in the United States: current issues and findings from theNESARC. Curr Opin Psychiatry 25:165-171.
21. Henniger MS, Spanagel R,Wigger A, Landgraf R, Holter SM (2002). Alcohol selfadministrationin two rat lines selectively bred for extremes in anxiety-relatedbehavior. Neuropsychopharmacology 26:729-736.
22. Kabbaj M (2006). Individual differences in vulnerability to drug abuse: the highresponders/low responders model. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 5:513-520.
23. Kalsi G, Prescott CA, Kendler KS, Riley BP (2009). Unraveling the molecularmechanisms of alcohol dependence. Trends Genet 25:49-55.
24. Kushner MG, Abrams K, Borchardt C (2000). The relationship between anxietydisorders and alcohol use disorders: a review of major perspectives andfindings. Clin Psychol Rev 20:149-171.
25. Langeland W, Draijer N, van den Brink W (2004). Psychiatric comorbidity intreatment-seeking alcoholics: the role of childhood trauma and perceivedparental dysfunction. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 28:441-447.
26. Laviola G, Adriani W, Terranova ML, Gerra G (1999). Psychobiological riskfactors for vulnerability to psychostimulants in human adolescents and animalmodels. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 23:993-1010.
27. Laviola G, Macri S, Morley-Fletcher S, Adriani W (2003). Risk-taking behavior inadolescent mice: psychobiological determinants and early epigeneticinfluence. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 27:19-31.
28. Leggio L, Kenna GA, Fenton M, Bonenfant E, Swift RM (2009). Typologies ofalcohol dependence. From Jellinek to genetics and beyond. NeuropsycholRev 19:115-129.
29. Lö fgren M, Johansson IM, Meyerson B, Turkmen S, Bä ckström T (2009).Withdrawal effects from progesterone and estradiol relate to individual risktakingand explorative behavior in female rats. Physiol Behav 96:91-97.
30. Meyerson BJ, Augustsson H, Berg M, Roman E (2006). The concentric squarefield: a multivariate test arena for analysis of explorative strategies. BehavBrain Res 168:100-113.
31. Meyerson BJ, Jurek B, Roman E (2013). A rank-order procedure applied to anethoexperimental behavior model-the multivariate concentric square fieldt(MCSF) test. J Behav Brain Sci 3:350-361.
32. Morozova TV, Goldman D, Mackay TF, Anholt RR (2012). The genetic basis ofalcoholism: multiple phenotypes, many genes, complex networks. GenomeBiol 13:239.
33. Nadal R, Armario A, Janak PH (2002). Positive relationship between activity in anovel environment and operant ethanol self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology(Berl) 162:333-338.
34. O'Leary TP, Gunn RK, Brown RE 2013, What are we measuring when we teststrain differences in anxiety in mice? Behav Genet 43, 34-50
35. O'Leary TP, Gunn RK, Brown RE (2013). What are we measuring when we teststrain differences in anxiety in mice? Behav Genet 43:34-50.Palm S, Roman E, Nylander I (2011). Differences in voluntary ethanol consumptionin Wistar rats from five different suppliers. Alcohol 45:607-614.
36. Palm S, Lundberg S, Nylander I, Roman E (2014). Risk-assessment and risktakingbehavior predict potassium-and amphetamine-induced dopamineresponse in the dorsal striatum of rats. (Submitted for publication).
37. Piazza PV, Deminiere JM, Le Moal M, Simon H (1989). Factors that predictindividual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 245:1511-1513.
38. Ploj K, Roman E, Nylander I (2003). Long-term effects of maternal separation onethanol intake and brain opioid and dopamine receptors in male Wistar rats.Neuroscience 121:787-799.
39. Roman E, Arborelius L (2009). Male but not female Wistar rats show increasedanxiety-like behaviour in response to bright light in the defensivewithdrawal test. Behav Brain Res 202:303-307.
40. Roman E, Colombo G (2009). Lower risk taking and exploratory behavior inalcohol-preferring sP rats than in alcohol nonpreferring sNP rats in themultivariate concentric square fieldt (MCSF) test. Behav Brain Res205:249-258.
41. Roman E, Stewart RB, Bertholomey ML, Jensen ML, Colombo G, Hyytiä P, et al.(2012). Behavioral profiling of multiple pairs of rats selectively bred for highand low alcohol intake using the MCSF test. Addict Biol 17:33-46.
42. Samson HH, Czachowski CL (2003). Behavioral measures of alcohol selfadministrationand intake control: rodent models. Int Rev Neurobiol 54:107-143.
43. Schuckit MA (2006). Comorbidity between substance use disorders andpsychiatric conditions. Addiction 101 (Suppl 1):76-88.
44. Simms JA, Steensland P, Medina B, Abernathy KE, Chandler LJ,Wise R, Bartlett SE(2008). Intermittent access to 20% ethanol induces high ethanol consumptionin Long-Evans and Wistar rats. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 32:1816-1823.
45. Steensland P, Fredriksson I, Holst S, Feltmann K, Franck J, Schilström B,Carlsson A (2012). The monoamine stabilizer (-)-OSU6162 attenuatesvoluntary ethanol intake and ethanol-induced dopamine output in nucleusaccumbens. Biol Psychiatry 72:823-831.
46. Stephens DN, Crombag HS, Duka T (2013). The challenge of studying parallelbehaviors in humans and animal models. Curr Top Behav Neurosci 13:611-645.
47. Walsh RN, Cummins RA (1976). The open-field test: a critical review. PsycholBull 83:482-504.
48. Wise RA (1973). Voluntary ethanol intake in rats following exposure to ethanol onvarious schedules. Psychopharmacologia 29:203-210.