Effects of elevated CO2 on the extractable amino acids of leaf litter and fine roots

New Phytologist

Volumn 202, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1257-1266

  Top, Sara M ^a,b   Filley, Timothy R ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Amino acids; Climate change; Leaf; Root

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; NITROGEN;

DRUG EFFECTS; METABOLISM; PLANT LEAF; PLANT ROOT; POPULUS;

AMINO ACIDS; CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; NITROGEN; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT ROOTS; POPULUS;

EID: 84899874879     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12762     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Amelung W, Zhang X. 2001. Determination of amino acid enantiomers in soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 33: 553-562.
2. 2. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20: 1479-1484.
3. Chapin FS III, Vitousek PM, Van Cleve KV. 1986. The nature of nutrient limitation in plant communities. American Naturalist 127: 48-58.
4. 3 on tree fine root decomposition. Tree Physiology 25: 1501-1510.
5. 2 concentration on quality of plant material and litter decomposition. Tree Physiology 19: 301-311.
6. Couture JJ, Meehan TD, Lindroth RL. 2012. Atmospheric change alters foliar quality of host trees and performance of two outbreak insect species. Oecologia 168: 863-876.
7. 3 enrichment (FACE) project in an overview. St Paul, MN, USA: USDA forest service north central research station general tech rep NC-214.
8. Ehleringer JR, Buchmann N, Flanagan LB. 2000. Carbon isotope ratios in belowground carbon cycle processes. Ecological Applications 10: 412-422.
9. Fahey TJ, Hughes JW. 1994. Fine root dynamics in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem, Hubbard Brook experimental forest, NH. Journal of Ecology 82: 533-548.
10. 2 enrichment. Ecology 82: 470-484.
11. 2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104: 14014-14019.
12. Hendrick RL, Pregitzer KS. 1992a. The demography of fine roots in a northern hardwood forest. Ecology 73: 1094-1104.
13. Hendrick RL, Pregitzer KS. 1992b. Spatial variation in tree root distribution and growth associated with minirhizotrons. Plant and Soil 143: 283-288.
14. +-N cycling in a temperate pine ecosystem. Global Change Biology 13: 1950-1959.
15. 3. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 43: 1518-1527.
16. 2 enrichment on biomass, yield, and low molecular weight metabolites in wheat grain. Journal of Cereal Science 52: 215-220.
17. 3. Global Change Biology 9: 1743-1750.
18. 3 alter soil nitrogen transformations beneath trembling aspen, paper birch, and sugar maple. Ecosystems 9: 1354-1363.
19. 3, and genotype. Oecologia 137: 233-244.
20. Hopkins FM, Torn MS, Trumbore SE. 2012. Warming accelerates decomposition of decades-old carbon in forest soils. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109: E1753-E1761.
21. Hutchings MJ, John EA. 2004. The effects of environmental heterogeneity on root growth and root/shoot partitioning. Annals of Botany 94: 1-8.
22. 2] in forested ecosystems. New Phytologist 186: 346-357.
23. Iversen CM, Norby RJ. 2008. Nitrogen limitation in a sweetgum plantation, implications for carbon allocation and storage. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38: 1021-1032.
24. Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Schulze E-D. 1997. A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 94: 7362-7366.
25. 3. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 39: 3159-3166.
26. Jones DL, Healey JR, Willett VB, Farrar JF, Hodge A. 2005. Dissolved organic nitrogen uptake by plants - an important N uptake pathway? Soil Biology & Biochemistry 37: 413-423.
27. Jones DL, Kielland K. 2002. Soil amino acid turnover dominates the nitrogen flux in permafrost-dominated taiga forest soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 34: 749-756.
28. 2 on forest trees and forest ecosystems, knowledge gaps. Environment International 29: 161-169.
29. Karnosky DF, Pregitzer KS, Zak DR, Kubiske ME, Hendrey GR, Weinstein D, Percy KE. 2005. Scaling ozone responses of forest trees to the ecosystem level. Plant, Cell & Environment 28: 965-981.
30. 2. New Phytologist 168: 623-636.
31. 3. Oecologia 128: 237-250.
32. Köchy M, Wilson SD. 1997. Litter decomposition and nitrogen dynamics in aspen forest and mixed-grass prairie. Ecology 78: 632-739.
33. 3 on intra- and interspecific competitive ability of aspen. Plant Biology 9: 342-355.
34. Kuzyakov YV. 2001. Tracer studies of carbon translocation by plants from the atmosphere into the soil (a review). Eurasian Soil Science 34: 28-42.
35. Larson JL, Zak DR, Sinsabaugh RL. 2002. Extracellular enzyme activity beneath temperate trees growing under elevated carbon dioxide and ozone. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66: 1848-1856.
36. 2 environments. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 64-68.
37. 3 on forests: phytochemistry, trophic interactions, and ecosystem dynamics. Journal of Chemical Ecology 36: 2-21.
38. Lindroth RL, Kopper BJ, Parsons WFJ, Bockheim JG, Karnosky DF, Hendrey GR, Isebrands JG, Sober J. 2001. Consequences of elevated carbon dioxide and ozone for foliar chemical composition and dynamics in trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) and paper birch (Betula papyrifera). Environmental Pollution 115: 395-404.
39. 3 on leaf litter production and chemistry in trembling aspen and paper birch ecosystems. Tree Physiology 15: 1511-1522.
40. 3 on nutrient dynamics: decomposition of leaf litter in trembling aspen and paper birch communities. Plant and Soil 299: 65-82.
41. 3 in a northern hardwood ecosystem. Ecosystems 12: 401-416.
42. Macko SA, Uhle ME, Engel MH, Andrusevich V. 1997. Stable nitrogen isotope analysis of amino acid enantiomers by gas chromatography/combustion/isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 69: 926-929.
43. 2 enrichment and carbon partitioning to phenolics, do plant responses accord better with the protein competition of the growth-differentiation balance models? Oikos 111: 337-347.
44. McClaugherty CA, Abern JD, Melillo JM. 1984. Decomposition dynamics of fine roots in forested ecosystems. Oikos 42: 378-386.
45. McGuire AD, Melillo JM, Joyce LA. 1995. The role of nitrogen in the response of forest net primary production to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26: 473-503.
46. 3 on aspen leaf litter chemistry and earthworm and springtail productivity. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 42: 1132-1137.
47. 2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102: 18052-18056.
48. 2-enriched deciduous forest and the implications for carbon storage. Ecological Applications 12: 1261-1266.
49. 2-enriched sweetgum forest. Ecology 87: 5-14.
50. 2 enrichment (FACE) experiments. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 42: 181-203.
51. 3 on leaf ultrastructure of aspen (Populus tremuloides) and birch (Betula papyrifera) in the aspen FACE experiment. Environmental Pollution 115: 437-446.
52. 3 in a northern hardwood forest. Ecosystems 11: 505-519.
53. 2 affect secondary metabolism and ecosystem function? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13: 20-24.
54. 2 increases root exudation from loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) seedlings as an N-mediated response. Tree Physiology 29: 1513-1523.
55. 2. Ecology Letters 15: 1042-1049.
56. 3. New Phytologist 180: 153-161.
57. 2 interactions on fine root dynamics in temperate forests: a theoretical model analysis. Global Change Biology 8: 486-503.
58. Rejsek K, Formanek P, Vranova V. 2010. The soil amino acids: quality, distribution, and site ecology. New York, NY, USA: Nova Science Publishers Inc.
59. 2 enrichments on soluble amino acids and organic acids in barley primary leaves as a function of age, photoperiod and chlorosis. Plant Science 174: 576-582.
60. 2 levels. Journal of Applied Entomology 133: 189-197.
61. Talhelm AF, Pregitzer KS, Zak DR. 2009. Species-specific responses to atmospheric carbon dioxide and tropospheric ozone mediate changes in soil carbon. Ecology Letters 12: 1219-1228.
62. 2 concentration enhanced the activity of carbohydrate-metabolism enzymes, source carbohydrate production, photoassimilate transport, and sink strength for Opunita ficus-indica. Plant Physiology 110: 893-902.
63. 3? Environmental Pollution 115: 473-481.
64. 15N in developing forest ecosystems. Ecology 88: 2630-2639.
65. 2. Ecology Letters 14: 1220-1226.