Natural insertions in rice commonly form tandem duplications indicative of patch-mediated double-strand break induction and repair

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 18, 2014, Pages 6684-6689

  Vaughn, Justin N ^a   Bennetzen, Jeffrey L ^a  

^a University of Georgia   (United States)

Author keywords

Double strand break repair; Structural DNA variation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DNA REPAIR; DONOR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; EXCISION REPAIR; GENE DELETION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE INSERTION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETIC VARIABILITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RICE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; TANDEM REPEAT;

DOUBLE-STRAND BREAK REPAIR; STRUCTURAL DNA VARIATION;

DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA END-JOINING REPAIR; DNA REPAIR; DNA, PLANT; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC VARIATION; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTAGENESIS, INSERTIONAL; ORYZA SATIVA; TANDEM REPEAT SEQUENCES;

EID: 84899820743     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1321854111     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ma J, Bennetzen JL (2004) Rapid recent growth and divergence of rice nuclear genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(34):12404-12410.
2. Wicker T,Buchmann JP,Keller B(2010) Patching gaps in plant genomes results in gene movement and erosion of colinearity. Genome Res, 20, 9, 1229-1237.
3. Puchta H (2005) The repair of double-strand breaks in plants: Mechanisms and consequences for genome evolution. J Exp Bot 56(409):1-14.
4. Fauser F, et al. (2012) In planta gene targeting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(19): 7535-7540.
5. Woodhouse MR, Pedersen B, Freeling M (2010) Transposed genes in Arabidopsis are often associated with flanking repeats. PLoS Genet 6(5):e1000949.
6. Salomon S, Puchta H (1998) Cap ture of genomic and T-DNA sequences during doublestrand break repair in somatic plant cells. EMBO J 17(20):6086-6095.
7. Pace JK, 2nd, Sen SK, Batzer MA, Feschotte C (2009) Repair-mediated d uplication by capture of proximal chromosomal DNA has shaped vertebrate genome evolution. PLoS Genet 5(5):e1000469.
8. Mali P, et al. (2013) RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339(6121):823-826.
9. Huefner ND, Mizuno Y, Weil CF, Korf I, Britt AB (2011) Breadth by depth: Expandin g our understanding of the repair of transposon-induced DNA double strand breaks via deep-sequencing. DNA Repair (Amst) 10(10):1023-1033.
10. Messer PW, Arndt PF (2007) The majority of recent short DNA insertions in the human genome are tandem duplications. Mol Biol Evol 24(5):1190-1197.
11. Thomas EE (2005) Short, local duplications in eukaryotic genomes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 15(6):640-644.
12. Nourmohammad A, Lä ssig M (2011) Formation of regulatory modules by local sequence duplication. PLOS Comput Biol 7(10):e1002167.
13. Levinson G, Gutman GA (1987) Slipped-strand mispairing: A major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol 4(3):203-221.
14. Chen J-M, Chuzhanova N, Stenson PD, Férec C, Cooper DN (2005) Meta-analysis of gross insertions causing human genetic disease: Novel mutational mechanisms and the role of replication slippage. Hum Mutat 25(2):207-221.
15. Reyon D, et al. (2012) FLASH assembly of TALENs for high-throughput genome editing. Nat Biotechnol 30(5):460-465.
16. Thomas EE, et al. (2004) Distribution of short paired duplications in mammalian genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(28):10349-10354.
17. Vispé S, Satoh MS (2000) DNA repair patch-mediated double strand DNA break formation in human cells. J Biol Chem 275(35):27386-27392.
18. Xu X, et a l. (2012) Resequencing accessions of cultivated and wild rice yields markers for identifying agronomically important genes. Nat Biotechnol 30(1):105-111.
19. Zhao G, Guan Y (2010) Polymerization behavior of Klenow fragment and Taq DNA polymerase in short primer extension reactions. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 42(10):722-728.
20. Montgomery SB, et al.; 1000 Genomes Project Con sortium (2013) The origin, evolution, and functional impact of short insertion-deletion variants identified in 179 human genomes. Genome Res 23(5):749-761.
21. Roth DB, Porter TN, Wilson JH (1985) Mechanisms of nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol 5(10):2599-2607.
22. Lloyd AH,Wang D,Timmis JN(2012) Single molecule PCR reveals similar patterns of non-homologous DSB repair in tobacco and Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE, 7, 2, e32255.
23. Ward JF (1988) DNA damage produced by ionizing radiation inmammalian cells: Identities, mechanisms of formation, and reparability. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 35:95-125.
24. Mali P, et al. (2013) CAS9 transcriptional activators for target specificity screening and paired nickases for cooperative genome engineering. Nat Biotechnol 31(9):833-838.
25. Costa RMA, Chiganç as V, Galhardo RdaS, Carvalho H, Menck CF (2003) The eukaryotic nucleotide excision repair pathway. Biochimie 85(11):1083-1099.
26. Nick McElhinny SA, et al. (2005) A gradient of template dependence defines distinct biological roles for family X polymerases in nonhomologous end joining. Mol Cell 19(3):357-366.
27. Amoroso A, et al. (2011) Oxidative DNA damage bypass in Arabidopsis thaliana requires DNA polymerase and proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Plant Cell 23(2):806-822.
28. Garc ía-Ortiz MV, Ariza RR, Hoffman PD, Hays JB, Roldá n-Arjona T (2004) Arabidopsis thaliana AtPOLK encodes a DinB-like DNA polymerase that extends mispaired primer termini and is highly expressed in a variety of tissues. Plant J 39(1):84-97.
29. Garcia-Diaz M, Bebenek K (2007) Multiple functions of DNA polymerases. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 26(2):105-122.
30. Sebesta M, Burkovics P, Haracska L, Krejci L (2011) Reconstitution of DNA repair synthesis in vitro and the role of polymerase and helicase activities. DNA Repair (Amst) 10(6):567-576.
31. Roth N, et al. (2012) The require ment for recombination factors differs considerably between different pathways of homologous double-strand break repair in somatic plant cells. Plant J 72(5):781-790.
32. St Charles J, et al. (2012) Hig h-resolution genome-wide analysis of irradiated (UV and -rays) diploid yeast cells reveals a high frequency of genomic loss of heterozygosity (LOH) events. Genetics 190(4):1267-1284.
33. Rissman AI, et al. (2009) Reordering contigs of draft genomes using the Mauve aligner. Bioinformatics 25(16):2071-2073.
34. Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30(4):772-780.
35. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A (2000) EMBOSS: The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet 16(6):276-277.
36. Stajich JE, et al. (2002) The Bioperl toolkit: Perl modules for the life sciences. Genome Res 12(10):1611-1618.