Comparative evaluation of peptide desalting methods for salivary proteome analysis

Clinica Chimica Acta

Volumn 434, Issue , 2014, Pages 16-20

  Jehmlich, Nico ^a,b   Golatowski, Claas ^a   Murr, Annette ^a   Salazar, Gesell ^a   Dhople, Vishnu Mukund ^a   Hammer, Elke ^a   Völker, Uwe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICINE GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

^b HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Peptide desalting devices; Peptide purification; Saliva proteomics; Shotgun LC MS MS

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DESALTING DEVICE; DEVICES; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETER; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NORMAL HUMAN; PEPTIDE DESALTING METHOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SALIVA ANALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; PROCEDURES; PROTEOMICS; SALIVA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

PEPTIDE;

CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; HUMANS; PEPTIDES; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SALIVA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 84899801819     PISSN: 00098981     EISSN: 18733492     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Azarkan M., Huet J., Baeyens-Volant D., Looze Y., Vandenbussche G. Affinity chromatography: a useful tool in proteomics studies. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2007, 849:81-90.
2. Larsen M.R., Cordwell S.J., Roepstorff P. Graphite powder as an alternative or supplement to reversed-phase material for desalting and concentration of peptide mixtures prior to matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-mass spectrometry. Proteomics 2002, 2:1277-1287.
3. Kam K.T., Liang X., Wang J.R., et al. Evaluation on the effect of different in-gel peptide IEF parameters in global proteomic profiling. Anal Biochem 2013, 443(1):27-33.
4. Musuku A., Tan A., Awaiye K., Trabelsi F. Comparison of two-concentration with multi-concentration linear regressions: retrospective data analysis of multiple regulated LC-MS bioanalytical projects. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2013, 934:117-123.
5. Afkarian M., Bhasin M., Dillon S.T., et al. Optimizing a proteomics platform for urine biomarker discovery. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010, 9:2195-2204.
6. Evans D.R., Romero J.K., Westoby M. Concentration of proteins and removal of solutes. Methods Enzymol 2009, 463:97-120.
7. Tao D., Zhu G., Sun L., et al. Serially coupled microcolumn reversed phase liquid chromatography for shotgun proteomic analysis. Proteomics 2009, 9:2029-2036.
8. Golatowski C., Salazar M.G., Dhople V.M., et al. Comparative evaluation of saliva collection methods for proteome analysis. Clin Chim Acta 2013, 419:42-46.
9. Dunham W.H., Larsen B., Tate S., et al. A cost-benefit analysis of multidimensional fractionation of affinity purification-mass spectrometry samples. Proteomics 2011, 11:2603-2612.
10. Hardin A.M., Harinarayan C., Malmquist G., Axen A., van Reis R. Ion exchange chromatography of monoclonal antibodies: effect of resin ligand density on dynamic binding capacity. J Chromatogr A 2009, 1216:4366-4371.
11. Zhai L., Chang C., Li N., et al. Systematic research on the pretreatment of peptides for quantitative proteomics using a C18 microcolumn. Proteomics 2013, 13:2229-2237.
12. Franz T., Li X. Proteomics. 2012 Aug, 12(15-16):2487-2492. The OASIS® HLB μElution plate as a one-step platform for manual high-throughput in-gel digestion of proteins and peptide desalting. 10.1002/pmic.201100354.