A sequential comparison on the risk of haemorrhage with different sizes of biopsy needles for stereotactic brain biopsy

Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 160-169

  Yuen, Jason ^a   Zhu, Cannon X L ^a   Chan, Danny T M ^a   Ng, Rebecca Y T ^a   Nia, Wai ^a   Poon, Wai Sang ^a   Ng, Ho Keung ^a   Mok, Vincent C T ^a   Wong, Laurence K S ^a   Cheung, Tom C Y ^b   Siu, Deyond Y W ^b  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Biopsy needle; Brain biopsy; Complication; Diagnostic yield; Haemorrhage; Neuronavigation; Stereotactic biopsy

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOPSY NEEDLE; BRAIN BIOPSY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; RISK REDUCTION; STEREOTACTIC BIOPSY; SURGICAL RISK; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CUTTING NEEDLE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT RISK; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDLE BIOPSY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RISK FACTOR; STEREOTACTIC PROCEDURE; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; STEREOTAXIC TECHNIQUES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84899782993     PISSN: 10116125     EISSN: 14230372     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000360862     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Air EL, Leach JL, Warnick RE, McPherson CM: Comparing the risks of frameless stereotactic biopsy in eloquent and noneloquent regions of the brain: a retrospective review of 284 cases. J Neurosurg 2009; 111: 820-824.
2. Chen CC, Hsu PW, Wu TWE, Lee ST, Chang CN, Wei KC, Chuang CC, Wu CT, Lui TN, Hsu YH, Lin TK, Lee SC, Huang YC: Stereotactic brain biopsy: single center retrospective analysis of complications. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2009; 111: 835-839.
3. Dammers R, Haitsma IK, Schouten JW, Kros JM, Avezaat CJ, Vincent AJ: Safety and efficacy of frameless and frame-based intracranial biopsy techniques. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2008; 150: 23-29.
4. Dammers R, Schouten JW, Haitsma IK, Vincent AJ, Kros JM, Dirven CM: Towards improving the safety and diagnostic yield of stereotactic biopsy in a single centre. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010; 152: 1915-1921.
5. Ersahin M, Karaaslan N, Gurbuz MS, Hakan T, Berkman MZ, Ekinci O, Denizli N, Aker FV: The safety and diagnostic value of framebased and CT-guided stereotactic brain biopsy technique. Turk Neurosurg 2011; 21: 582-590.
6. Frati A, Pichierri A, Bastianello S, Raco A, Santoro A, Esposito V, Giangaspero F, Salvati M: Frameless stereotactic cerebral biopsy: our experience in 296 cases. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2011; 89: 234-245.
7. Grossman R, Sadetzki S, Spiegelmann R, Ram Z: Haemorrhagic complications and the incidence of asymptomatic bleeding associated with stereotactic brain biopsies. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2005; 147: 627-631, discussion 631.
8. Kondziolka D, Firlik AD, Lunsford LD: Complications of stereotactic brain surgery. Neurol Clin 1998; 16: 35-54. (Pubitemid 28081030)
9. Kreth FW, Muacevic A, Medele R, Bise K, Meyer T, Reulen HJ: The risk of haemorrhage after image guided stereotactic biopsy of intra-axial brain tumours-a prospective study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2001; 143: 539-545, discussion 545-536.
10. McGirt MJ, Woodworth GF, Coon AL, Frazier JM, Amundson E, Garonzik I, Olivi A, Weingart JD: Independent predictors of morbidity after image-guided stereotactic brain biopsy: a risk assessment of 270 cases. J Neurosurg 2005; 102: 897-901. (Pubitemid 43194012)
11. Nishihara M, Sasayama T, Kudo H, Kohmura E: Morbidity of stereotactic biopsy for intracranial lesions. Kobe J Med Sci 2010; 56:E148-E153.
12. Owen CM, Linskey ME: Frame-based stereotaxy in a frameless era: current capabilities, relative role, and the positive and negative predictive values of blood through the needle. J Neurooncol 2009; 93: 139-149.
13. Teixeira MJ, Fonoff ET, Mandel M, Alves HL, Rosemberg S: Stereotactic biopsies of brain lesions. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2009; 67: 74-77.
14. Tsermoulas G, Mukerji N, Borah AJ, Mitchell P, Ross N: Factors affecting diagnostic yield in needle biopsy for brain lesions. Br J Neurosurg 2013; 27: 207-211.
15. Dorward NL, Paleologos TS, Alberti O, Thomas DG: The advantages of frameless stereotactic biopsy over frame-based biopsy. Br J Neurosurg 2002; 16: 110-118. (Pubitemid 34539012)
16. Woodworth GF, McGirt MJ, Samdani A, Garonzik I, Olivi A, Weingart JD: Frameless image-guided stereotactic brain biopsy procedure: diagnostic yield, surgical morbidity, and comparison with the frame-based technique. J Neurosurg 2006; 104: 233-237.
17. Ringel F, Ingerl D, Ott S, Meyer B: Varioguide: a new frameless image-guided stereotactic system-accuracy study and clinical assessment. Neurosurgery 2009; 64: 365-371, discussion 371-363.
18. Lobao CA, Nogueira J, Souto AA, Oliveira JA: Cerebral biopsy: comparison between framebased stereotaxy and neuronavigation in an oncology center. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2009; 67: 876-881.
19. Hall WA: The safety and efficacy of stereotactic biopsy for intracranial lesions. Cancer 1998; 82: 1749-1755. (Pubitemid 28208927)
20. Harrisson SE, Shooman D, Grundy PL: A prospective study of the safety and efficacy of frameless, pinless electromagnetic imageguided biopsy of cerebral lesions. Neurosurgery 2012; 70: 29-33, discussion 33.
21. Lunsford LD, Martinez AJ: Stereotactic exploration of the brain in the era of computed tomography. Surg Neurol 1984; 22: 222-230. (Pubitemid 14055974)
22. Shooman D, Belli A, Grundy PL: Image-guided frameless stereotactic biopsy without intraoperative neuropathological examination. J Neurosurg 2010; 113: 170-178.
23. Lunsford LD, Niranjan A, Khan AA, Kondziolka D: Establishing a benchmark for complications using frame-based stereotactic surgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2008; 86: 278-287.
24. Nor MAM, Rahman NAA, Adnan JS: Intracranial bleed post stereotactic biopsy: lessons learned. Internet J Neurosurg DOI: 10.5580/2ba5.
25. Warnick RE, Longmore LM, Paul CA, Bode LA: Postoperative management of patients after stereotactic biopsy: results of a survey of the AANS/CNS section on tumors and a single institution study. J Neurooncol 2003; 62: 289-296. (Pubitemid 36591965)
26. Kutlay M, Simsek H, Colak A, Demircan MN: Balloon compression technique in the management of persistent intraoperative intratumoral hemorrhage resulting from stereotactic biopsy: technical note. Neurosurgery 2010; 66: 334-335, discussion 335.
27. Bernstein M, Parrent AG: Complications of CT-guided stereotactic biopsy of intra-axial brain lesions. J Neurosurg 1994; 81: 165-168. (Pubitemid 24237991)
28. Sawin PD, Hitchon PW, Follett KA, Torner JC: Computed imaging-assisted stereotactic brain biopsy: a risk analysis of 225 consecutive cases. Surg Neurol 1998; 49: 640-649. (Pubitemid 28285426)
29. Arora K, Punia RS, D'Cruz S: Comparison of diagnostic quality of kidney biopsy obtained using 16 G and 18 G needles in patients with diffuse renal disease. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2012; 23: 88-92.
30. Atwell TD, Smith RL, Hesley GK, Callstrom MR, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS, Charboneau JW, Welch TJ: Incidence of bleeding after 15, 181 percutaneous biopsies and the role of aspirin. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194: 784-789.
31. Cozens NJ, Murchison JT, Allan PL, Winney RJ: Conventional 15 G needle technique for renal biopsy compared with ultrasound-guided spring-loaded 18 G needle biopsy. Br J Radiol 1992; 65: 594-597.
32. Laopaiboon V, Aphinives C, Suporntreetriped K: Adequacy and complications of CTguided percutaneous biopsy: a study of 334 cases in Srinagarind Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai 2009; 92: 939-946.
33. McCormack M, Duclos A, Latour M, McCormack MH, Liberman D, Djahangirian O, Bergeron J, Valiquette L, Zorn K: Effect of needle size on cancer detection, pain, bleeding and infection in TRUS-guided prostate biopsies: a prospective trial. Can Urol Assoc J 2012; 6: 97-101.
34. Song JH, Cronan JJ: Percutaneous biopsy in diffuse renal disease: comparison of 18-and 14-gauge automated biopsy devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1998; 9: 651-655. (Pubitemid 28328565)
35. Czyz M, Tabakow P, Jarmundowicz W, Lechowicz-Glogowska B: Intraoperative magnetic resonance-guided frameless stereotactic biopsies-initial clinical experience. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2012; 46: 157-160.
36. Field M, Witham TF, Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD: Comprehensive assessment of hemorrhage risks and outcomes after stereotactic brain biopsy. J Neurosurg 2001; 94: 545-551. (Pubitemid 32799646)
37. Kim JE, Kim DG, Paek SH, Jung HW: Stereotactic biopsy for intracranial lesions: reliability and its impact on the planning of treatment. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2003; 145: 547-554, discussion 554-545.
38. Dorward NL, Alberti O, Palmer JD, Kitchen ND, Thomas DG: Accuracy of true frameless stereotaxy: in vivo measurement and laboratory phantom studies. Technical note. J Neurosurg 1999; 90: 160-168. (Pubitemid 29024757)
39. Kranz R, Gliemroth J, Gaebel C, Reincke B, Arnold H, Kehler U: Atypical delayed intracranial haematoma following stereotactic biopsy of a right parietal anaplastic oligodendroglioma. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2003; 105: 188-192. (Pubitemid 36809202)
40. Kulkarni AV, Guha A, Lozano A, Bernstein M: Incidence of silent hemorrhage and delayed deterioration after stereotactic brain biopsy. J Neurosurg 1998; 89: 31-35. (Pubitemid 28285919)
41. Grundy PL, Weidmann C, Bernstein M: Daycase neurosurgery for brain tumours: the early United Kingdom experience. Br J Neurosurg 2008; 22: 360-367. (Pubitemid 351878624)
42. Kaakaji W, Barnett GH, Bernhard D, Warbel A, Valaitis K, Stamp S: Clinical and economic consequences of early discharge of patients following supratentorial stereotactic brain biopsy. J Neurosurg 2001; 94: 892-898. (Pubitemid 32799587)
43. Bernays RL, Kollias SS, Khan N, Brandner S, Meier S, Yonekawa Y: Histological yield, complications, and technological considerations in 114 consecutive frameless stereotactic biopsy procedures aided by open intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 2002; 97: 354-362. (Pubitemid 34827336)