Effect of needle size on cancer detection, pain, bleeding and infection in TRUS-guided prostate biopsies: A prospective trial

Journal of the Canadian Urological Association

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 97-101

  McCormack, Michael ^a   Duclos, Alain ^a   Latour, Mathieu ^a   McCormack, Marie Hélène ^b   Liberman, Daniel ^a   Djahangirian, Orchidee ^a   Bergeron, Josette ^a   Valiquette, Luc ^a   Zorn, Kevin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

^b HEC MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860014264     PISSN: 19116470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.11169     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Eichler K, Hempel S, Wilby J, et al. Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review. J Urol 2006;175:1605-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0022-5347(05)00957-2.
2. Benway BM, Andriole GL. Prostate biopsy, UpToDate, June 16, 2011. http://www.uptodate.com/ contents/prostate-biopsy. Accessed March 6, 2012.
3. Saredi G, Sighinolfi MC, Fidanza F, et al. Does needle calibre affect pain and complication rates in patients undergoing transperineal prostate biopsy? A prospective, randomized trial. Asian J Androl 2009 11:678-82. Epub 2009 Sep 21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/aja.2009.43.
4. Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, et al. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 1983;17:45-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(83)90126-4.
5. Zani EL, Clark OA, Rodrigues Netto N Jr. Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;5:CD006576.
6. Schaeffer AJ, Montorsi F, Scattoni V, et al. Comparison of a 3-day with a 1-day regimen of an extended-release formulation of ciprofloxacin as antimicrobial prophylaxis for patients undergoing transrectal needle biopsyof the prostate. BJU Int 2007;100:51-7.
7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06848.x
8. Sabbagh R, McCormack M, Peloquin F, et al. A prospective randomized trial of 1-day versus 3-day antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Can J Urol 2004;11:2216-9.
9. Kapoor DA, Klimberg IW, Malek GH, et al. Single-dose oral ciprofloxacin versus placebo for prophylaxis during transrectal prostate biopsy. Urology 1998;52:552-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00296-9.
10. Aron M, Rajeev TP, Gupta NP. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate: a randomized controlled study. BJU Int 2000;85:682-5.
11. El-Hakim A, Moussa S. CUA guidelines on prostate biopsy methodology. Can Urol Ass J 2010;4;89-94.
12. AUA Best Practice Policy Statement on Urologic Surgery Antimicrobial Prophylaxis. (2008) (Reviewed and validity confirmed 2011.) (http://www.auanet.org)
13. Stewart CS, Leibovich BC, Weaver AL, et al. Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies. J Urol 2001;166:86-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66083-1.
14. Pepe P, Aragona F. Saturation prostate needle biopsy and prostate cancer detection at initial and repeat evaluation. Urology 2007;70:1131-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.068.
15. Helbich TH, Rudas M, Haitel A, et al. Evaluation of needle size for breast biopsy: comparison of 14-, 16-, and 18-gauge biopsy needles. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:59-63.
16. Inal GH, Oztekin VC, Uǧurlu O, et al. Sixteen gauge needles improve specimen quality but not cancer detection rate in transrectal ultrasound-guided 10-core prostate biopsies. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2008;11:270-3. Epub 2008 Jun 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2008.34.
17. Shigehara K, Miyagi T, Nakashima T, et al. Acute bacterial prostatitis after transrectal prostate needle biopsy: clinical analysis. J Infect Chemother 2008;14:40-3. Epub 2008 Feb 24. http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s10156-007-0570-3