Temporal dynamics underlying the modulation of social status on social attention

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2014, Pages

  Dalmaso, Mario ^a   Galfano, Giovanni ^a   Coricelli, Carol ^a   Castelli, Luigi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; FACE; FEMALE; GAZE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; SOCIAL ATTENTION; SOCIAL STATUS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ATTENTION; CUES; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; SOCIAL CLASS; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84899760746     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093139     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Gould RV (2002) The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. Am J Sociol 107: 1143-1178.
2. Cummins DD (2000) How the social environment shaped the evolution of mind. Synthese 122: 3-28.
3. Henrich J, Gil-White FJ (2001) The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evol Hum Behav 22: 165-196. (Pubitemid 33623897)
4. Boyce WT (2004) Social stratification, health, and violence in the very young. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1036: 47-68.
5. Dunham Y, Baron A, Banaji M (2006) From american city to japanese village: A cross-cultural investigation of implicit race attitudes. Child Dev 77: 1268-1281. (Pubitemid 44453646)
6. Pellegrini AD, Van Ryzin MJ, Roseth C, Bohn-Gettler C, Dupuis D, et al. (2011) Behavioral and social cognitive processes in preschool children's social dominance. Aggressive Behav 37: 248-257.
7. Bowker JC, Rubin KH, Buskirk-Cohen A, Rose-Krasnor L, Booth-LaForce C (2010) Behavioral changes predicting temporal changes in perceived popular status. J App Dev Psychol 31: 126-133.
8. Lansu TAM, Cillessen AHM, Karremans JC (2013) Adolescents' selective visual attention for high-status peers: The role of perceiver status and gender. Child Dev In press.
9. Clutton-Brock TH, Harvey PH (1976) Evolutionary rules and primate societies. In: Bateson PPG, Hinde RA, Growing points in ethology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 195-238.
10. Fiske AP (1992) The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychol Rev 99: 689-723.
11. Wilson EO (2000) Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge: Belknap Press. 697.
12. Grosenick L, Celement TS, Fernald RD (2007) Fish can infer social rank by observation alone. Nature 445: 429-432. (Pubitemid 46160910)
13. Davis H (1992) Transitive inference in rats (Rattus norvegicus). J Comp Psychol 106: 342-349.
14. Maestripieri D (1996) Primate cognition and the bared-teeth display: A reevaluation of the concept of formal dominance. J Comp Physiol Psychol 110: 402-405.
15. Ratcliff NJ, Hugenberg K, Shriver ER, Bernstein MJ (2011) The allure of status: High-status targets are privileged in face processing and memory. Pers Soc Psychol B 20: 1-13.
16. Ratcliff NJ, Franklin RG Jr, Nelson AJ, Vescio TK (2012) The scorn of status: A bias toward perceiving anger on high-status faces. Soc Cognition 30: 631-642.
17. Nummenmaa L, Calder AJ (2009) Neural mechanisms of social attention. Trends Cogn Sci 13: 135-143.
18. Shepherd SV (2010) Following gaze: gaze-following behavior as a window into social cognition. Front Integr Neurosci 4: 1-13.
19. Emery NJ (2000) The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 24: 581-604.
20. Posner MI (1980) Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 32: 3-25.
21. Bayliss AP, di Pellegrino G, Tipper SP (2005) Sex differences in eye gaze and symbolic cueing of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 58: 631-650. (Pubitemid 40689172)
22. Dalmaso M, Galfano G, Tarqui L, Forti B, Castelli L (2013) Is social attention impaired in schizophrenia? Gaze but not pointing gestures is associated with spatial attention deficits. Neuropsychology 27: 608-613.
23. Driver J, Davis G, Ricciardelli P, Kidd P, Maxwell E, et al. (1999) Gaze perception triggers reflexive visuospatial orienting. Vis Cogn 6: 509-540.
24. Friesen CK, Kingstone A (1998) The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychon Bull Rev 5: 490-495. (Pubitemid 128457708)
25. Galfano G, Sarlo M, Sassi F, Munafò M, Fuentes LJ, et al. (2011) Reorienting of spatial attention in gaze cuing is reflected in N2pc. Soc Neurosci 6: 257-269.
26. Galfano G, Dalmaso M, Marzoli D, Pavan G, Coricelli C, et al. (2012) Eye gaze cannot be ignored (but neither can arrows). Q J Exp Psychol 65: 1895-1910.
27. Kuhn G, Kingstone A (2009) Look away! Eyes and arrows engage oculomotor responses automatically. Atten Percept Psycho 71: 314-327.
28. Kuhn G, Tipples J (2011) Increased gaze following for fearful faces. It depends on what you're looking for! Psychon Bull Rev 18: 89-95.
29. Liuzza MT, Cazzato V, Vecchione M, Crostella F, Caprara GV, et al. (2011) Follow my eyes: The gaze of politicians reflexively captures the gaze of ingroup voters. PLoS ONE 6: e25117.
30. Liuzza MT, Vecchione M, Dentale F, Crostella F, Barbaranelli C, et al. (2013) A look into the ballot box: Gaze following conveys information about implicit attitudes toward politicians. Q J Exp Psychol 66: 209-216.
31. Frischen A, Bayliss AP, Tipper SP (2007) Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychol Bull 133: 694-724.
32. Frischen A, Tipper SP (2004) Orienting attention via observed gaze shifts evokes longer term inhibitory effects: Implications for social interactions, attention, and memory. J Exp Psychol Gen 133: 516-533. (Pubitemid 39666183)
33. Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Main JC, Little AC, Welling LL, et al. (2010) Facial cues of dominance modulate the short-term gaze-cuing effect in human observers. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 277: 617-624.
34. Jones BC, Main JC, Little AC, DeBruine LM (2011) Further evidence that facial cues of dominance modulate gaze cuing in human observers. Swiss J Psychol 70: 193-197.
35. Ohlsen G, van Zoest W, van Vugt M (2013) Gender and facial dominance in gaze cuing: Emotional context matters in the eyes that we follow. PLoS ONE 8: e59471.
36. Pavan G, Dalmaso M, Galfano G, Castelli L (2011) Racial group membership is associated to gaze-mediated orienting in Italy. PLoS ONE 6: e25608.
37. Dalmaso M, Pavan G, Castelli L, Galfano G (2012) Social status gates social attention in humans. Biol Lett 8: 450-452.
38. Castelli L, Zogmaister C, Smith ER, Arcuri L (2004) On the automatic evaluation of social exemplars. J Pers Soc Psychol 86: 373-387. (Pubitemid 38397473)
39. Phillips PJ, Wechsler H, Huang J, Rauss P (1998) The FERET database and evaluation procedure for face recognition algorithms. Image Vis Comput 16: 295-306. (Pubitemid 128393579)
40. Masson MEJ (2011) A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to nullhypothesis significance testing. Behav Res Methods 43: 679-690.
41. van Ede F, de Lange FP, Maris E (2012) Attentional cues affect accuracy and reaction time via different cognitive and neural processes. J Neurosci 32: 10408-10412.
42. Maner JK, Dewall CN, Gailliot MT (2008) Selective attention to signs of success: Social dominance and early stage interpersonal perception. Pers Soc Psychol B 34: 488-501.
43. Chiao JY, Bordeaux AR, Ambady N (2004) Mental representations of social status. Cognition 93: B49-B57. (Pubitemid 39451873)
44. Freeman JB, Penner AM, Saperstein A, Scheutz M, Ambady N (2011) Looking the part: Social status cues shape race perception. PloS ONE 6: e25107.
45. Holmes A, Green S, Vuilleumier P (2005) The involvement of distinct visual channels in rapid attention towards fearful facial expressions. Cogn Emot 19: 899-922. (Pubitemid 41387494)
46. Stone A, Valentine T (2005) Orientation of attention to nonconsciously recognised famous faces. Cogn Emot 19: 537-558. (Pubitemid 40895209)
47. Trawalter S, Todd AD, Baird AA, Richeson JA (2008) Attending to threat: Race-based patterns of selective attention. J Exp Soc Psychol 44: 1322-1327.
48. Shepherd SV, Deaner RO, Platt ML (2006) Social status gates social attention in monkeys. Curr Biol 16: R119-R120. (Pubitemid 43259334)
49. DeWall CN, Manner JK (2008) High status men (but not women) capture the eye of the beholder. Evol Psychol 6: 328-341.
50. Foulsham T, Cheng JT, Tracy JL, Henrich J, Kingstone A (2010) Gaze allocation in a dynamic situation: Effects of social status and speaking. Cognition 117: 319-331.
51. Beasley M, Sabatinelli D, Obasi E (2012) Neuroimaging evidence for social rank theory. Front Hum Neurosci 6: 123.
52. Chiao JY,Adams RB Jr, Tse PU, Lowenthal WT, Richeson JA, et al. (2008) Knowing who's boss: fMRI and ERP investigations of social dominance perception. Group Process Intergr Relat 11: 201-214.
53. Hogeveen J, Inzlicht M, Obhi SS (2013) Power changes how the brain responds to others. J Exp Psychol Gen In press.
54. Kumaran D, Melo HL, Duzel E (2012) The emergence and representation of knowledge about social and nonsocial hierarchies. Neuron 76: 653-666.
55. Ly M, Haynes MR, Barter JW, Weinberger DR, Zink CF (2011) Subjective socioeconomic status predicts human ventral striatal responses to social status information. Curr Biol 21: 794-797.
56. Muscatell KA, Morelli SA, Falk EB, Way BM, Pfeifer JH, et al. (2012) Social status modulates neural activity in the mentalizing network. NeuroImage 60: 1771-1777.
57. Chiao JY (2010) Neural basis of social status hierarchy across species. Curr Opin Neurobiol 20: 803-809.