Neuroimaging evidence for social rank theory

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue MAY 2012, 2012, Pages

  Beasley, Marian ^a   Sabatinelli, Dean ^b   Obasi, Ezemenari ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b University of Georgia   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; CORPUS STRIATUM; DOMINANCE BEHAVIOR; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMAN; LIMBIC CORTEX; NEUROANATOMY; NONHUMAN; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; SOCIAL STATUS;

EID: 84933675506     PISSN: 16625161     EISSN: 16625161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00123     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Adler, N., Epel, E., Castellazzo, G., and Ickovics, J. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychol. 19, 586-592.
2. Blanchard, R., McKittrick, C., and Blanchard, D. (2001). Animal models of social stress: effects on behavior and brain neurochemical systems. Physiol. Behav. 73, 261-271.
3. Chiao, J., Harada, T., Oby, E., Li, Z., Parrish, T., and Bridge, D. (2009). Neural representations of social status hierarchy in human inferior parietal cortex. Neuropsychologia 47, 354-363.
4. De Waal, F. (1989). Peacemaking Among Primates. New York: Penguin.
5. Fournier, M., Moscowitz, D., and Zuroff, D. (2002). Social rank strategies in hierarchical relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 83, 425-433.
6. Gesquiere, L., Learn, N., Simao, C., Onyango, P., Alberts, S., and Altmann, J. (2011). Life at the top: 220 rank and stress in wild male baboons. Science 333, 357-360.
7. Gianaros, P., Horenstein, J., Cohen, S., Matthews, K., Brown, S., Flory, J., Critchley, H., Manuck, S., and Hariri, A. (2007). Perigenual anterior cingulate mor-phology covaries with perceived social standing. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2, 161-173.
8. Gilbert, P. (2000). "Varieties of submissive behavior as forms of social defense: their evolution and role in depression," in Subordination and Defeat: An Evolutionary Approach to Mood Disorders and Their Therapy, eds P. Gilbert and L. Sloman (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 3-45.
9. Gilbert, P. (2005). Evolution and depression: issues and implications. Psychol. Med. 36, 287-297.
10. Irons, C., and Gilbert, P. (2004). Evolved mechanisms in adolescent anxiety and depression symptoms: the role of the attachment and social rank systems. J. Adolesc. 28, 325-341.
11. Kelly, A., Zuroff, D., Leybman, M., and Martin, A. (2011). Leaders' and followers' social rank styles interact to predict group performance. Soc. Behav. Pers. 39, 963-978.
12. Levitan, R., Hasey, G., and Sloman, L. (2000). "Major depression and the involuntary defeat strategy: biological correlates," in Subordination and Defeat: An Evolutionary Approach to Mood Disorders and Their Therapy, eds P. Gilbert and L. Sloman (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 95-120.
13. Ly, M., Haynes, M., Barter, J., Weinberger, D., and Zink, C. (2011). Subjective socioeconomic status predicts human ventral striatal responses to social status information. Curr. Biol. 21, 794-797.
14. Morrison, K., Swallows, C., and Cooper, M. (2011). Effects of dominance status on conditioned defeat and expression of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors. Physiol. Behav. 104, 283-290.
15. Sapolsky, R. (2004). Social status and health in humans and other animals. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 33, 393-418.
16. Sapolsky, R. (2005). The influence of social hierarchy on primate health. Science 308, 648-652.
17. Tiedens, L., and Fragale, A. (2003). Power moves: complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 84, 558-568.
18. Zink, C., Tong, Y., Chen, Q., Bassett, D., Stein, J., and Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2008).Know your place: neural processing of social hierarchy in humans. Neuron 58, 273-283.
19. Zuroff, D., Fournier, M., Patall, E., and Leybman, M. (2010). Steps toward an evolutionary personality psychology: individual differences in the social rank domain. Can. Psychol. 51, 58-66.