PI3K pathway activation in high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ-implications for progression to invasive breast carcinoma

Clinical Cancer Research

Volumn 20, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 2326-2337

  Sakr, Rita A ^a   Weigelt, Britta ^a   Chandarlapaty, Sarat ^a   Andrade, Victor P ^a   Guerini Rocco, Elena ^a   Giri, Dilip ^a   Ng, Charlotte K Y ^a   Cowell, Catherine F ^a   Rosen, Neal ^a   Reis Filho, Jorge S ^a   King, Tari A ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR 2; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR; PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3 KINASE; PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3,4,5 TRISPHOSPHATE 3 PHOSPHATASE; PROTEIN KINASE B; PROTEIN S6; TUMOR MARKER;

ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOGENESIS; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER GRADING; CANCER GROWTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR POSITIVE BREAST CANCER; GENE ACTIVATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LOSS; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MICRODISSECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ALLELE; BIOPSY; BREAST TUMOR; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; GENETICS; METABOLISM; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PATHOLOGY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TUMOR INVASION;

ALLELES; BIOMARKERS, TUMOR; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; DISEASE PROGRESSION; DNA MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; NEOPLASM GRADING; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3-KINASES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84899752893     PISSN: 10780432     EISSN: 15573265     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2267     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Lopez-Garcia MA, Geyer FC, Lacroix-Triki M, Marchio C, Reis-Filho JS. Breast cancer precursors revisited: molecular features and progression pathways. Histopathology 2010;57:171-92.
2. Polyak K. Molecular markers for the diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010;2010:210-3.
3. Cowell CF, Weigelt B, Sakr RA, Ng CK, Hicks J, King TA, et al. Progression from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: revisited. Mol Oncol 2013;7:859-69.
4. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2013. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2013.
5. Wellings SR, Jensen HM. On the origin and progression of ductal carcinoma in the human breast. J Natl Cancer Inst 1973;50:1111-8.
6. Buerger H, Otterbach F, Simon R, Poremba C, Diallo R, Decker T, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast-evidence of multiple genetic pathways. J Pathol 1999;187: 396-402.
7. Buerger H, Otterbach F, Simon R, Schafer KL, Poremba C, Diallo R, et al. Different genetic pathways in the evolution of invasive breast cancer are associated with distinct morphological subtypes. J Pathol 1999;189:521-6.
8. Burkhardt L, Grob TJ, Hermann I, Burandt E, Choschzick M, Janicke F, et al. Gene amplification in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010;123:757-65.
9. O'Connell P, Pekkel V, Fuqua SA, Osborne CK, Clark GM, Allred DC. Analysis of loss of heterozygosity in 399 premalignant breast lesions at 15 genetic loci. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:697-703.
10. Solin LJ, Gray R, Baehner FL, Butler SM, Hughes LL, Yoshizawa C, et al. A multigene expression assay to predict local recurrence risk for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst 2013;105: 701-10.
11. Kerlikowske K, Molinaro AM, Gauthier ML, Berman HK, Waldman F, Bennington J, et al. Biomarker expression and risk of subsequent tumors after initial ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102:627-37.
12. Gao Y, Niu Y, Wang X, Wei L, Lu S. Genetic changes at specific stages of breast cancer progression detected by comparative genomic hybridization. J Mol Med 2009;87:145-52.
13. Liao S, Desouki MM, Gaile DP, Shepherd L, Nowak NJ, Conroy J, et al. Differential copy number aberrations in novel candidate genes associated with progression from in situ to invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2012;51: 1067-78.
14. Yao J, Weremowicz S, Feng B, Gentleman RC, Marks JR, Gelman R, et al. Combined cDNA array comparative genomic hybridization and serial analysis of gene expression analysis of breast tumor progression. Cancer Res 2006;66:4065-78.
15. ENCODE Project Consortium, DunhamI, Kundaje A, Aldred SF, Collins PJ, Davis CA, et al. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 2012;489:57-74.
16. Moelans CB, de Wegers RA, Monsuurs HN, Maess AH, van Diest PJ. Molecular differences between ductal carcinoma in situ and adjacent invasive breast carcinoma: a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification study. Cell Oncol 2011;34:475-82.
17. Porter D, Lahti-Domenici J, Keshaviah A, Bae YK, Argani P, Marks J, et al. Molecular markers in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Mol Cancer Res 2003;1:362-75.
18. Johnson CE, Gorringe KL, Thompson ER, Opeskin K, Boyle SE, Wang Y, et al. Identification of copy number alterations associated with the progression of DCIS to invasive ductal carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012;133:889-98.
19. Robanus-Maandag EC, Bosch CA, Kristel PM, Hart AA, Faneyte IF, Nederlof PM, et al. Association of C-MYC amplification with progression from the in situ to the invasive stage in C-MYC-amplified breast carcinomas. J Pathol 2003;201:75-82.
20. Ma XJ, Salunga R, Tuggle JT, Gaudet J, Enright E, McQuary P, et al. Gene expression profiles of human breast cancer progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:5974-9.
21. Vincent-Salomon A, Lucchesi C, Gruel N, Raynal V, Pierron G, Goudefroye R, et al. Integrated genomic and transcriptomic analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14: 1956-65.
22. Jang MH, Kim EJ, Choi Y, Lee HE, Kim YJ, Kim JH, et al. FGFR1 is amplified during the progression of in situ to invasive breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res 2012;14:R115.
23. Hernandez L, Wilkerson PM, Lambros MB, Campion-Flora A, Rodrigues DN, Gauthier A, et al. Genomic and mutational profiling of ductal carcinomas in situ and matched adjacent invasive breast cancers reveals intra-tumour genetic heterogeneity and clonal selection. J Pathol 2012;227:42-52.
24. Heselmeyer-Haddad K, Berroa Garcia LY, Bradley A, Ortiz-Melendez C, Lee WJ, Christensen R, et al. Single-cell genetic analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer reveals enormous tumor heterogeneity yet conserved genomic imbalances and gain of MYC during progression. Am J Pathol 2012;181:1807-22.
25. Reis-Filho JS, Pusztai L. Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: classification, prognostication, and prediction. Lancet 2011;378: 1812-23.
26. Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 2012;490:61-70.
27. Courtney KD, Corcoran RB, Engelman JA. The PI3K pathway as drug target in human cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:1075-83.
28. Stemke-Hale K, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Lluch A, Neve RM, Kuo WL, Davies M, et al. An integrative genomic and proteomic analysis of PIK3CA, PTEN, and AKT mutations in breast cancer. Cancer Res 2008;68:6084-91.
29. Marty B, Maire V, Gravier E, Rigaill G, Vincent-Salomon A, Kappler M, et al. Frequent PTEN genomic alterations and activated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway in basal-like breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res 2008;10:R101.
30. Jones N, Bonnet F, Sfar S, Lafitte M, Lafon D, Sierankowski G, et al. Comprehensive analysis of PTEN status in breast carcinomas. Int J Cancer 2013;133:323-34.
31. Fedele CG, Ooms LM, Ho M, Vieusseux J, O'Toole SA, Millar EK, et al. Inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase II regulates PI3K/Akt signaling and is lost in human basal-like breast cancers. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA 2010;107:22231-6.
32. Gewinner C, Wang ZC, Richardson A, Teruya-Feldstein J, Etemadmoghadam D, Bowtell D, et al. Evidence that inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II is a tumor suppressor that inhibits PI3K signaling. Cancer Cell 2009;16:115-25.
33. Carpten JD, Faber AL, Horn C, Donoho GP, Briggs SL, Robbins CM, et al. A transforming mutation in the pleckstrin homology domain of AKT1 in cancer. Nature 2007;448:439-44.
34. Troxell ML, Levine J, Beadling C, Warrick A, Dunlap J, Presnell A, et al. High prevalence of PIK3CA/AKT pathway mutations in papillary neoplasms of the breast. Mod Pathol 2010;23:27-37.
35. Dunlap J, Le C, Shukla A, Patterson J, Presnell A, Heinrich MC, et al. Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase and AKT1 mutations occur early in breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010;120:409-18.
36. Miron A, Varadi M, Carrasco D, Li H, Luongo L, Kim HJ, et al. PIK3CA mutations in in situ and invasive breast carcinomas. Cancer Res 2010;70:5674-8.
37. Kalinsky K, Heguy A, Bhanot UK, Patil S, Moynahan ME. PIK3CA mutations rarely demonstrate genotypic intratumoral heterogeneity and are selected for in breast cancer progression. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011;129:635-43.
38. Silverstein MJ, Poller DN, Waisman JR, Colburn WJ, Barth A, Gierson ED, et al. Prognostic classification of breast ductal carcinoma in situ. Lancet 1995;345:1154-7.
39. Fisher ER, Gregorio RM, Fisher B, Redmond C, Vellios F, Sommers SC. The pathology of invasive breast cancer. A syllabus derived from findings of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (protocol no. 4). Cancer 1975;36:1-85.
40. Sakr RA, Barbashina V, Morrogh M, Chandarlapaty S, Andrade VP, Arroyo CD, et al. Protocol for PTEN expression by immunohistochemistry in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded human breast carcinoma. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2010;18:371-4.
41. Chandarlapaty S, Sakr RA, Giri D, Patil S, Heguy A, Morrow M, et al. Frequent mutational activation of the PI3K-AKT pathway in trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2012;18:6784-91.
42. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN, Hagerty KL, Allred DC, Cote RJ, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007;25: 118-45.
43. Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, Allred DC, Hagerty KL, Badve S, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College Of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:2784-95.
44. Adamo B, Deal AM, Burrows E, Geradts J, Hamilton E, Blackwell KL, et al. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway activation in breast cancer brain metastases. Breast Cancer Res 2011;13:R125.
45. Duprez R, Wilkerson PM, Lacroix-Triki M, Lambros MB, Mackay A, Hern RA, et al. Immunophenotypic and genomic characterization of papillary carcinomas of the breast. J Pathol 2012;226:427-41.
46. Kalinsky K, Jacks LM, Heguy A, Patil S, Drobnjak M, Bhanot UK, et al. PIK3CA mutation associates with improved outcome in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:5049-59.
47. Troxell ML, Brunner AL, Neff T, Warrick A, Beadling C, Montgomery K, et al. Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase pathway mutations are common in breast columnar cell lesions. Mod Pathol 2012;25:930-7.
48. Pinhel IF, Macneill FA, Hills MJ, Salter J, Detre S, A'Hern R, et al. Extreme loss of immunoreactive p-Akt and p-Erk1/2 during routine fixation of primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2010;12:R76.
49. Meric-Bernstam F, Akcakanat A, Chen H, Sahin A, Tarco E, Carkaci S, et al. Effect of biospecimen variables on proteomic biomarker assessment in breast cancer. Cancer Res 2012;72:P1-07-6.