A method to measure visual field sensitivity at the edges of glaucomatous scotomata

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 2584-2591

  Aoyama, Yuka ^a   Murata, Hiroshi ^a   Tahara, Mayumi ^a   Yanagisawa, Mieko ^a   Hirasawa, Kazunori ^a,b   Mayama, Chihiro ^a   Asaoka, Ryo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b KITASATO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Test grid; Visual field

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLOSED ANGLE GLAUCOMA; CONGENITAL GLAUCOMA; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; LOW TENSION GLAUCOMA; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOEXFOLIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

GLAUCOMA; TEST GRID; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; SCOTOMA; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 84899652509     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-13616     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80:389-393.
2. Congdon N, O'Colmain B, Klaver CC, et al. Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:477-485.
3. Aulhorn E, Harms H. Early visual field defects in glaucoma. In: Leydheeker W, ed. Glaucoma Symposion Tutziug Castle 1966. New York: Karger Basel; 1967:151-186.
4. Maddess T. The influence of sampling errors on test-retest variability in perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52: 1014-1022.
5. Weber J, Dobek K. What is the most suitable grid for computer perimetry in glaucoma patients? Ophthalmologica. 1986;192: 88-96.
6. Fankhauser F, Haberlin H, Jenni A. Octopus programs SAPRO and F. Two new principles for the analysis of the visual field. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1981;216: 155-165.
7. Haeberlin H, Jenni A, Fankhauser F. Researches on adaptive high resolution programming for automatic perimetry. Int Ophthal. 1980;2:1-9.
8. Turpin A, Artes PH, McKendrick AM. The Open Perimetry Interface: an enabling tool for clinical visual psychophysics. J Vis. 2012;12(11):22.
9. Wyatt HJ, Dul MW, Swanson WH. Variability of visual field measurements is correlated with the gradient of visual sensitivity. Vision Res. 2007;47:925-936.
10. Haefliger IO, Flammer J. Increase of the short-term fluctuation of the differential light threshold around a physiologic scotoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107:417-420.
11. Haefliger IO, Flammer J. Fluctuation of the differential light threshold at the border of absolute scotomas. Comparison between glaucomatous visual field defects and blind spots. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:1529-1532.
12. Henson D, Bryson H. Is the Variability in Glaucomatous Field Loss Due to Poor Fixation Control? Amsterdam: Kugler; 1990.
13. Jansonius NM. On the accuracy of measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94:1404-1405.
14. Gardiner SK, Crabb DP. Frequency of testing for detecting visual field progression. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:560-564.
15. Asaoka R, Russell RA, Malik R, Crabb DP, Garway-Heath DF. A novel distribution of visual field test points to improve the correlation between structure-function measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:8396-8404.
16. Schiefer U, Flad M, Stumpp F, et al. Increased detection rate of glaucomatous visual field damage with locally condensed grids: a comparison between fundus-oriented perimetry and conventional visual field examination. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:458-465.
17. Nevalainen J, Paetzold J, Papageorgiou E, et al. Specification of progression in glaucomatous visual field loss, applying locally condensed stimulus arrangements. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;247:1659-1669.
18. Zeyen TG, Zulauf M, Caprioli J. Priority of test locations for automated perimetry in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1993;100: 518-522. discussion 523.
19. Leeuw JD. Handbook of Multilevel Analysis. New York: Springer; 2008.
20. Strouthidis NG, Vinciotti V, Tucker AJ, et al. Structure and function in glaucoma: The relationship between a functional visual field map and an anatomic retinal map. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:5356-5362.
21. Wilcox RR. Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing. Salt Lake City: Academic Press; 2012.
22. Gardiner SK, Demirel S, Johnson CA. Modeling the sensitivity to variability relationship in perimetry. Vision Res. 2006;46: 1732-1745.
23. Heijl A. Time changes of contrast thresholds during automatic perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1977;55:696-708.
24. Hudson C, Wild JM, O'Neill EC. Fatigue effects during a single session of automated static threshold perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:268-280.
25. Artes PH, Iwase A, Ohno Y, Kitazawa Y, Chauhan BC. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:2654-2659.
26. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105:1544-1549.
27. Turpin A, Jankovic D, McKendrick AM. Retesting visual fields: utilizing prior information to decrease test-retest variability in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:1627-1634.
28. Chauhan BC, Garway-Heath DF, Goni FJ, et al. Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008; 92:569-573.
29. Heijl A, Drance SM. Changes in differential threshold in patients with glaucoma during prolonged perimetry. Br J Ophthalmol. 1983;67:512-516.
30. Searle AE, Wild JM, Shaw DE, O'Neill EC. Time-related variation in normal automated static perimetry. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:701-707.
31. Wall M, Woodward KR, Doyle CK, Artes PH. Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:974-979.