On the accuracy of measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 94, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1404-1405

  Jansonius, Nomdo M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLINDNESS; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; DISEASE COURSE; FOLLOW UP; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL FIELD;

DISEASE PROGRESSION; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 77958557563     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: 14682079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2009.164897     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Chauhan BC, Garway-Heath DF, Goñi FJ, et al. Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:569-73.
2. Holmin C, Krakau CET. Regression analysis on the central visual field in chronic glaucoma cases: a followup study using automatic perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1982;60:267-74.
3. Jansonius NM. Progression detection in glaucoma can be made more efficient by using a variable interval between successive visual field tests. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007;245:1647-51.
4. Wesselink C, Heeg GP, Jansonius NM. Glaucoma monitoring in a clinical setting: glaucoma progression analysis vs nonparametric progression analysis in the Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study. Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:270-4.
5. McNaught AI, Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, et al. Modelling series of visual fields to detect progression in normal-tension glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1995;233:750-5.
6. Jansonius NM. Towards an optimal perimetric strategy for progression detection in glaucoma: from fixed-space to adaptive inter-test intervals. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006;244:390-3.