Permeate recirculation impact on concentration polarization and fouling on RO purification of olive mill wastewater

Desalination

Volumn 343, Issue , 2014, Pages 169-179

  Ochando Pulido, J M ^a   Hodaifa, G ^b   Martinez Ferez A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD PABLO DE OLAVIDE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Fouling; Modeling; Nanofiltration; Olive mill wastewater; Ultrafiltration; Wastewater reclamation

Indexed keywords

FOULING; MEMBRANE FOULING; MODELS; NANOFILTRATION; POLARIZATION; PURIFICATION; REVERSE OSMOSIS; ULTRAFILTRATION; WASTEWATER RECLAMATION; WASTEWATER TREATMENT; WATER FILTRATION;

CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; INITIAL PERMEABILITY; IRREVERSIBLE FOULING; LOW PRESSURE MEMBRANES; MEMBRANE CONCENTRATION; OLIVE MILL WASTEWATERS; OPERATING VARIABLES; RECIRCULATION RATIO;

MEMBRANES;

CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); FOULING; MEMBRANE; NUMERICAL MODEL; OSMOSIS; POLARIZATION; PURIFICATION; ULTRAFILTRATION; WASTEWATER;

EID: 84899651048     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.03.025     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Bódalo A., Gómez J.L., Gómez E., Máximo F., Hidalgo A.M. Application of reverse osmosis to reduce pollutants present in industrial wastewater. Desalination 2003, 155:101-108.
2. López J., Coello M.D., Quiroga J.M. Comparative studies of reverse osmosis membranes for wastewater reclamation. Desalination 2006, 191:137-147.
3. Ferella F., De Michelis I., Zerbini C., Vegliò F. Advanced treatment of industrial wastewater by membrane filtration and ozonization. Desalination 2013, 313:1-11.
4. Muthukumaran S., Nguyen D.A., Baskaran K. Performance evaluation of different ultrafiltration membranes for the reclamation and reuse of secondary effluent. Desalination 2011, 279:383-389.
5. Wandera D., Husson S.M. Assessment of fouling-resistant membranes for additive-free treatment of high-strength wastewaters. Desalination 2013, 309:222-230.
6. Lee J., Kwon T., Moon I. Performance of polyamide reverse osmosis membranes for steel wastewater reuse. Desalination 2006, 189:309-322.
7. Samodurov A.N., Lysenko S.E., Gromov S.L., Panteleev A.A., Fedoseeva E.B. The use of reverse osmosis technology for water treatment in power engineering. Therm. Eng. 2006, 53(6):439-443.
8. Epimakhov V.N., Oleinik M.S., Moskvin L.N. Reverse osmosis filtration based water treatment and special water purification for nuclear power systems. At. Energy 2004, 96(4):234-240.
9. Mittal P., Jana S., Mohanty K. Synthesis of low-cost hydrophilic ceramic-polymeric composite membrane for treatment of oily wastewater. Desalination 2011, 282:54-62.
10. Yin N., Yang G., Zhong Z., Xing W. Separation of ammonium salts from coking wastewater with nanofiltration combined with diafiltration. Desalination 2011, 268:233-237.
11. 3 based ceramic microfiltration membrane. Desalination 2012, 293:87-93.
12. Wei X., Wang Z., Fan F., Wang J., Wang S. Advanced treatment of a complex pharmaceutical wastewater by nanofiltration: membrane foulant identification and cleaning. Desalination 2010, 251:167-175.
13. Srisukphun T., Chiemchaisri C., Urase T., Yamamoto K. Foulant interaction and RO productivity in textile wastewater reclamation plan. Desalination 2010, 250:845-849.
14. Srivastava H.P., Arthanareeswaran G., Anantharaman N., Starov V.M. Performance of modified poly(vinylidene fluoride) membrane for textile wastewater ultrafiltration. Desalination 2011, 282:87-94.
15. Liu M., Lü Z., Chen Z., Yu S., Gao C. Comparison of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes in the treatment of biologically treated textile effluent for water reuse. Desalination 2011, 281:372-378.
16. Ellouze E., Tahri N., Ben Amar R. Enhancement of textile wastewater treatment process using Nanofiltration. Desalination 2012, 286:16-23.
17. Stoller M., Sacco O., Sannino D., Chianese A. Successful integration of membrane technologies in a conventional purification process of tannery wastewater streams. Membranes 2013, 3:126-135.
18. Mänttäri M., Nystörm M. Critical flux in NF of high molar mass polysaccharides and effluents from the paper industry. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 170:257-273.
19. Pizzichini M., Russo C., Di Meo C. Purification of pulp and paper wastewater with membrane technology for water reuse in a closed loop. Desalination 2005, 178:351-359.
20. Puro L., Kallioinen M., Mänttäri M., Natarajan G., Cameron D.C., Nyström M. Performance of RC and PES ultrafiltration membranes in filtration of pulp mill process waters. Desalination 2010, 264:249-255.
21. Iaquinta M., Stoller M., Merli C. Optimization of a nanofiltration membrane for tomato industry wastewater treatment. Desalination 2009, 245:314-320.
22. Ochando-Pulido J.M., Stoller M., Bravi M., Martinez-Ferez A., Chianese A. Batch membrane treatment of olive vegetation wastewater from two-phase olive oil production process by threshold flux based methods. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 101:34-41.
23. Stoller M., Chianese A. Technical optimization of a batch olive wash wastewater treatment membrane plant. Desalination 2006, 200(1-3):734-736.
24. Coskun T., Debik E., Demir N.M. Treatment of olive mill wastewaters by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 2010, 259:65-70.
25. Cicci A., Stoller M., Bravi M. Microalgal biomass production by using ultra- and nanofiltration membrane fractions of olive mill wastewater. Water Res. 2013, 47:4710-4718.
26. 2 ceramic membrane with respect to beverage production wastewater. Desalination 2013, 311:162-172.
27. de la Casa E.J., Guadix A., Ibáñez R., Guadix E.M. Influence of pH and salt concentration on the cross-flow microfiltration of BSA through a ceramic membrane. Biochem. Eng. J. 2007, 33(2):110-115.
28. Luo J., Ding L. Influence of pH on treatment of dairy wastewater by nanofiltration using shear-enhanced filtration system. Desalination 2011, 278:150-156.
29. Cheryan M. Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration 1998, Technomic Publishing Company Inc., Lancaster, PA.
30. Chen V., Fane A.G., Maedani S., Wenten I.G. Particle deposition during membrane filtration of colloids: transition between concentration polarization and cake formation. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 125:109-122.
31. Stoller M., De Caprariis B., Cicci A., Verdone N., Bravi M., Chianese A. About proper membrane process design affected by fouling by means of the analysis of measured threshold flux data. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 114:83-89.
32. Stoller M., Bravi M., Chianese A. Threshold flux measurements of a nanofiltration membrane module by critical flux data conversion. Desalination 2013, 315:142-148.
33. Bacchin P., Aimar P., Sanchez V. Influence of surface interaction on transfer during colloid ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 115:49-63.
34. Field R.W., Aimar P. Ideal limiting fluxes in ultrafiltration: comparison of various theoretical relationships. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 80:107-115.
35. Seidel A., Elimelech M. Coupling between chemical and physical interactions in natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes: implications for fouling control. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 203:245-255.
36. Garrido Hoyos S.E., Martínez Nieto L., Camacho Rubio F., Ramos Cormenzana A. Kinetics of aerobic treatment of olive mill wastewater (OMW) with Aspergillus terreus. Process Biochem. 2002, 37(10):1169-1176.
37. Marques I.P. Anaerobic digestion treatment of olive mill wastewater for effluent re-use in irrigation. Desalination 2001, 137:233-239.
38. Fountoulakis M.S., Dokianakis S.N., Kornaros M.E., Aggelis G.G., Lyberatos G. Removal of phenolics in olive mill wastewaters using the white-rot fungus Pleurotus ostreatus. Water Res. 2002, 36:4735-4744.
39. Ammary B.Y. Treatment of olive mill wastewater using an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Desalination 2005, 177:157-165.
40. Taccari M., Ciani M. Use of Pichia fermentans and Candida sp. strains for the biological treatment of stored olive mill wastewater. Biotechnol. Lett. 2011, 33:2385-2390.
41. Paraskeva P., Diamadopoulos E. Technologies for olive mill wastewater (OMW) treatment: a review. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2006, 81:475-1485.
42. Annesini M., Gironi F. Olive oil mill effluent: ageing effects on evaporation behavior. Water Res. 1991, 25:1157-1960.
43. Aktas E.S., Imre S., Esroy L. Characterization and lime treatment of olive mill wastewater. Water Res. 2001, 35:2336-2340.
44. Al-Malah K., Azzam M.O.J., Abu-Lail N.I. Olive mills effluent (OME) wastewater post-treatment using activated clay. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2000, 20:225-234.
45. Cegarra J., Paredes C., Roig A., Bernal M.P., García D. Use of olive mill wastewater compost for crop production. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 1996, 38(3-4):193-203.
46. Papadimitriou E.K., Chatjipavlidis I., Balis C. Application of composting to olive mill wastewater treatment. Environ. Technol. 1997, 18(1):10-107.
47. Bouranis D.L., Vlyssides A.G., Drossopoulos J.B., Karvouni G. Some characteristics of a new organic soil conditioner from the co-composting of olive oil processing wastewater and solid residue. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1995, 26:2461-2472.
48. Martínez Nieto L., Ben Driss Alami S., Hodaifa G., Faur C., Rodríguez Vives S., Giménez Casares J.A., Ochando J. Adsorption of iron on crude olive stones. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2010, 32:467-471.
49. Hodaifa G., Ochando-Pulido J.M., Ben-Driss-Alami S., Rodriguez-Vives S., Martinez-Ferez A. Kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of iron adsorption onto olive stones. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013, 49:526-534.
50. Sarika R., Kalogerakis N., Mantzavinos D. Treatment of olive mill effluents. Part II. Complete removal of solids by direct flocculation with poly-electrolytes. Environ. Int. 2005, 31:297-304.
51. Martínez Nieto L., Hodaifa G., Rodríguez Vives J.A., Giménez Casares J., Ochando Flocculation-sedimentation combined with chemical oxidation process. Clean Soil Air Water 2011, 39(10):949-955.
52. Stoller M. On the effect of flocculation as pretreatment process and particle size distribution for membrane fouling reduction. Desalination 2009, 240:209-217.
53. Inan H., Dimoglo A., Şimşek H., Karpuzcu M. Olive oil mill wastewater treatment by means of electro-coagulation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2004, 36(1):23-31.
54. Tezcan Ün Ü., Uǧur S., Koparal A.S., Öǧütveren Ü.B. Electrocoagulation of olive mill wastewaters. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 52(1):136-141.
55. De Heredia J.B., Garcia J. Process integration: continuous anaerobic digestion-ozonation treatment of olive mill wastewater. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44:8750-8755.
56. Martínez Nieto L., Hodaifa G., Rodríguez Vives J.A., Giménez Casares J., Ochando J.M. Degradation of organic matter in olive oil mill wastewater through homogeneous Fenton-like reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 173(2):503-510.
57. Hodaifa G., Ochando-Pulido J.M., Rodriguez-Vives S., Martinez-Ferez A. Optimization of continuous reactor at pilot scale for olive-oil mill wastewater treatment by Fenton-like process. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 220:117-124.
58. Stoller M., Bravi M. Critical flux analyses on differently pretreated olive vegetation wastewater streams: some case studies. Desalination 2010, 250:578-582.
59. Papastefanakis N., Mantzavinos D., Katsaounis A. DSA electrochemical treatment of olive mill wastewater on Ti/RuO2 anode. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2010, 40(4):729-737.
60. Tezcan Ün Ü., Altay U., Koparal A.S., Ogutveren U.B. Complete treatment of olive mill wastewaters by electrooxidation. Chem. Eng. J. 2008, 139:445-452.
61. Canizares P., Martinez L., Paz R., Saéz C., Lobato J., Rodrigo M.A. Treatment of Fenton-refractory olive oil mill wastes by electrochemical oxidation with boron-doped diamond anodes. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2006, 81(8):1331-1337.
62. Grafias P., Xekoukoulotakis N.P., Mantzavinos D., Diamadopoulos E. Pilot treatment of olive pomace leachate by vertical-flow constructed wetland and electrochemical oxidation: an efficient hybrid process. Water Res. 2010, 44(9):2773-2780.
63. Lafi W.K., Shannak B., Al-Shannag M., Al-Anber Z., Al-Hasan M. Treatment of olive mill wastewater by combined advanced oxidation and biodegradation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 70(2):141-146.
64. Khoufi S., Aloui F., Sayadi S. Treatment of olive oil mill wastewater by combined process electro-Fenton reaction and anaerobic digestion. Water Res. 2006, 40:2007-2016.
65. Rizzo L., Lofrano G., Grassi M., Belgiorno V. Pretreatment of olive mill wastewater by chitosan coagulation and advanced oxidation processes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 63(3):648-653.
66. Ochando-Pulido J.M., Hodaifa G., Rodriguez-Vives S., Martinez-Ferez A. Impacts of operating conditions on reverse osmosis performance of pretreated olive mill wastewater. Water Res. 2012, 46(15):4621-4632.
67. Ochando-Pulido J.M., Rodriguez-Vives S., Martinez-Ferez A. The effect of permeate recirculation on the depuration of pretreated olive mill wastewater through reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 2012, 286:145-154.
68. Ochando-Pulido J.M., Martinez-Ferez A. A focus on pressure-driven membrane technology in olive mill wastewater reclamation: state of the art. Water Sci. Technol. 2012, 66(12):2505-2516. 10.2166/wst.2012.506.
69. Greenberg A.E., Clesceri L.S., Eaton A.D. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, APHA/AWWA/WEF 1992, Cabs, Washington DC. 16th.
70. Mickols W.E. DOW Water Solutions, Personal Communication 2008.
71. Choi H., Zhang K., Dionysiou D.D., Oerther D.B., Sorial G.A. Effect of permeate flux and tangential flow on membrane fouling for wastewater treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2005, 4(1):68-78.
72. Ognier S., Wisniewski C., Grasmick A. Influence of macromolecule adsorption during filtration of a membrane bioreactor mixed liquor suspension. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 209:27-37.
73. Elimelech M., Zhu X., Childress A., Hong S. Role of membrane surface morphology in colloidal fouling of cellulose acetate and composite polyamide reverse osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 127:101-109.
74. Cui Z.F., Jiang Y., Field R.W. Membrane technology. Chapter 1: Fundamentals of Pressure-Driven Membrane Separation Processes 2010, Elsevier.
75. Hoek E.M.V., Elimelech M. Cake-enhanced concentration polarization: a new fouling mechanism for salt-rejecting membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37:5581-5588.
76. Gwon E., Yu M., Oh H., Ylee Y. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater. Water Res. 2003, 37:2989-2997.
77. Wang F., Tarabara V.V. Pore blocking mechanisms during early stages of membrane fouling by colloids. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008, 328:464-469.
78. Madaeni S.S., Samieirad S. Chemical cleaning of reverse osmosis membrane fouled by wastewater. Desalination 2010, 257:80-86.
79. Jin X., Jawor A., Kim S., Hoek E. Effects of feed water temperature on separation performance and organic fouling of brackish water RO membranes. Desalination 2009, 239:346-359.
80. ASTM D4582-91 Standard Practice for Calculation and Adjustment of the Stiff and Davis Stability Index for Reverse Osmosis 2001, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, United States.