Influence of pH on treatment of dairy wastewater by nanofiltration using shear-enhanced filtration system

Desalination

Volumn 278, Issue 1-3, 2011, Pages 150-156

  Luo, Jianquan ^a   Ding, LuHui ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE COMPIÈGNE   (France)

Author keywords

Concentration polarization; Fouling; Milk; Rotating disk module

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE CLEANER; ALKALINE PH; CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; DAIRY INDUSTRY; DAIRY WASTEWATER; EFFECT OF PH; ELECTROSTATIC REPULSION; FILTRATION SYSTEMS; FOULING LAYERS; INFLUENCE OF PH; LABORATORY SCALE; MEMBRANE MODULE; MEMBRANE SWELLING; MILK; MODEL SOLUTION; NF MEMBRANES; ORGANIC SOLUTES; RETENTATE; SALT IONS; WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTICS;

ADSORPTION; AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; DAIRIES; DAIRY PRODUCTS; INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS; MEMBRANE FOULING; MEMBRANES; NANOFILTRATION; PH EFFECTS; POLARIZATION; ROTATING DISKS; ROTATION; WASTEWATER; WASTEWATER TREATMENT; WATER FILTRATION;

ALKALINITY;

CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); FILTRATION; FOULING; MEMBRANE; MILK; PERMEABILITY; PH; POLARIZATION; SOLUTE; SWELLING; WASTE TREATMENT; WASTEWATER;

EID: 80955177679     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.05.025     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Vourch M., Balannec B., Chaufer B., Dorange G. Treatment of dairy industry wastewater by reverse osmosis for water reuse. Desalination. 2008, 219:190-202.
2. Fernandez P., Riera F.A., Alvarez R., Alvarez S. Nanofiltration regeneration of contaminated single-phase detergents used in the dairy industry. J. Food Eng. 2010, 97:319-328.
3. Sengil I.A., Ozacar M. Treatment of dairy wastewaters by electrocoagulation using mild steel electrodes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 137:1197-1205.
4. Lansing S.L., Martin J.F. Use of an ecological treatment system (ETS) for removal of nutrients from dairy wastewater. Ecol. Eng. 2006, 28:235-245.
5. Demirel B., Yenigun O., Onay T.T. Anaerobic treatment of dairy wastewaters: a review, process. Biochem. 2005, 40:2583-2595.
6. Balannec B., Vourch M., Rabiller-Baudry M., Chaufer B. Comparative study of different nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dairy effluent treatment by dead-end filtration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2005, 42:195-200.
7. Vourch M., Balannec B., Chaufer B., Dorange G. Nanofiltration and reverse osmosis of model process waters from the dairy industry to produce water for reuse. Desalination. 2005, 172:245-256.
8. Akoum O., Jaffrin M.Y., Ding L.H., Frappart M. Treatment of dairy process waters using a vibrating filtration system and NF and RO membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 235:111-122.
9. Scott J.A., Smith K.L. A bioreactor coupled to a membrane to provide aeration and filtration in ice-cream factory wastewater remediation. Water Res. 1997, 31:69-74.
10. Sarkar B., Chakrabarti P.P., Vijaykumar A., Kale V. Wastewater treatment in dairy industries - possibility of reuse. Desalination. 2006, 195:141-152.
11. Koyuncu I., Turan M., Topacik D., Ates A. Application of low pressure nanofiltration membranes for the recovery and reuse of dairy industry effluents. Water Sci. Technol. 2000, 41:213-221.
12. Turan M. Influence of filtration conditions on the performance of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes in dairy wastewater treatment. Desalination. 2004, 170:83-90.
13. Frappart M., Akoum O., Ding L.H., Jaffrin M.Y. Treatment of dairy process waters modelled by diluted milk using dynamic nanofiltration with a rotating disk module. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 282:465-472.
14. Moulai-Mostefa N., Frappart M., Akoum O., Ding L.H., Jaffrin M.Y. Separation of water from metal working emulsions by ultrafiltration using vibratory membranes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 177:978-982.
15. Luo J.Q., Ding L.H., Wan Y.H., Paullier P., Jaffrin M.Y. Application of NF-RDM (Nanofiltration Rotating Disk Membrane) module under extreme hydraulic conditions for the treatment of dairy wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 163:307-316.
16. Danalewich J.R., Papagiannis T.G., Belyea R.L., Tumbleson M.E., Raskin L. Characterization of dairy waste streams, current treatment practices, and potential for biological nutrient removal. Water Res. 1998, 32:3555-3568.
17. Manttari M., Pihlajamaki A., Nystrom M. Effect of pH on hydrophilicity and charge and their effect on the filtration efficiency of NF membranes at different pH. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 280:311-320.
18. Ahmad A.L., Tan L.S., Shukor S.R.A. The role of pH in nanofiltration of atrazine and dimethoate from aqueous solution. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 154:633-638.
19. Nilsson M., Tragardh G., Ostergren K. The influence of pH, salt and temperature on nanofiltration performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 312:97-106.
20. Luo J.Q., Wei S.P., Su Y., Chen X.R., Wan Y.H. Desalination and recovery of iminodiacetic acid (IDA) from its sodium chloride mixtures by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 342:35-41.
21. Dalwani M., Benes N.E., Bargeman G., Stamatialis D., Wessling M. A method for characterizing membrane during nanofiltration at extreme pH. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 363:188-194.
22. Rabiller-Baudry M., Bouzid H., Chaufer B., Paugam L., Delaunay D., Mekmene O., Ahmad S., Gaucheron F. On the origin of flux dependence in pH-modified skim milk filtration. Dairy. Sci. Technol. 2009, 89:363-385.
23. Wijmans J.G., Nakao S., Van Den Berg J.W.A., Troelstra F.R., Smolders C.A. Hydrodynamic resistance of concentration polarization boundary layers in ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1985, 22:117-135.
24. Bowen W.R., Jenner F. Theoretical descriptions of membrane filtration of colloids and fine particles - an assessment and review. Adv. Colloid. Interfac. 1995, 56:141-200.
25. Luo J.Q., Ding L.H., Su Y., Wei S.P., Wan Y.H. Concentration polarization in concentrated saline solution during desalination of iron dextran by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 363:170-179.
26. Freger V., Arnot T.C., Howell J.A. Separation of concentrated organic/inorganic salt mixtures by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 178:185-193.
27. Freger V. Swelling and morphology of the skin layer of polyamide composite membranes: an atomic force microscopy study. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38:3168-3175.
28. Wijmans J.G., Baker R.W. The solution-diffusion model: a review. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 107:1-21.
29. van der horst H.C., Timmer J.M.K., Robbertsen T., Leenders J. Use of nanofiltration for concentration and demineralization in the dairy industry: model for mass transport. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 104:205-218.
30. Yu Y., Lee S., Hong S. Effect of solution chemistry on organic fouling of reverse osmosis membranes in seawater desalination. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 351:205-213.
31. Bouzid H., Rabiller-Baudry M., Paugam L., Rousseau F., Derriche Z., Bettahar N.E. Impact of zeta potential and size of caseins as precursors of fouling deposit on limiting and critical fluxes in spiral ultrafiltration of modified skim milks. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 314:67-75.
32. Al-Amoudi A.S. Factors affecting natural organic matter (NOM) and scaling fouling in NF membranes: a review. Desalination. 2010, 259:1-10.