Serial dependence in visual perception

Nature Neuroscience

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 738-743

  Fischer, Jason ^a,b,c   Whitney, David ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EXPECTATION; EXPLICIT MEMORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYSTERESIS; MALE; MENTAL TASK; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY STIMULATION; VISION; VISUAL ORIENTATION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSEUDOURIDINE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; VISION, OCULAR; VISUAL PATHWAYS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84899650509     PISSN: 10976256     EISSN: 15461726     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nn.3689     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Webster, M.A. Pattern selective adaptation in color and form perception. Vis. Neurosci. 2, 936-947 (2003).
2. Fang, F. & He, S. Viewer-centered object representation in the human visual system revealed by viewpoint aftereffects. Neuron 45, 793-800 (2005).
3. Clifford, C.W., Wyatt, A.M., Arnold, D.H., Smith, S.T. & Wenderoth, P. Orthogonal adaptation improves orientation discrimination. Vision Res. 41, 151-159 (2001).
4. Dragoi, V., Sharma, J. & Sur, M. Adaptation-induced plasticity of orientation tuning in adult visual cortex. Neuron 28, 287-298 (2000).
5. Kohn, A. Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits. J. Neurophysiol. 97, 3155-3164 (2007).
6. Dong, D.W. & Atick, J.J. Statistics of natural time-varying images. Network 6, 345-358 (1995).
7. Magnussen, S. & Greenlee, M.W. The psychophysics of perceptual memory. Psychol. Res. 62, 81-92 (1999).
8. Magnussen, S., Greenlee, M.W., Asplund, R. & Dyrnes, S. Stimulus-specific mechanisms of visual short-term memory. Vision Res. 31, 1213-1219 (1991).
9. Shaffer, L. Timing in the motor programming of typing. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 30, 333-345 (1978).
10. Wing, A.M. & Kristofferson, A.B. Response delays and the timing of discrete motor responses. Percept. Psychophys. 14, 5-12 (1973).
11. Fender, D. & Julesz, B. Extension of Panum's fusional area in binocularly stabilized vision. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 819-830 (1967).
12. Williams, D., Phillips, G. & Sekuler, R. Hysteresis in the perception of motion direction as evidence for neural cooperativity. Nature 324, 253-255 (1986).
13. Hock, H.S., Scott, J. & Schöner, G. Bistability and hysteresis in the organization of apparent motion patterns. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 19, 63-80 (1993).
14. Kanai, R. & Verstraten, F.A. Attentional modulation of perceptual stabilization. Proc. Biol. Sci. 273, 1217-1222 (2006).
15. Holmes, D.J., Hancock, S. & Andrews, T.J. Independent binocular integration for form and colour. Vision Res. 46, 665-677 (2006).
16. Hancock, S., Whitney, D. & Andrews, T.J. The initial interactions underlying binocular rivalry require visual awareness. J. Vis. 8, 1-9 (2008).
17. Wolfe, J.M. Reversing ocular dominance and suppression in a single flash. Vision Res. 24, 471-478 (1984).
18. Brascamp, J.W. et al. Multi-timescale perceptual history resolves visual ambiguity. PLoS ONE 3, e1497 (2008).
19. Sterzer, P., Frith, C. & Petrovic, P. Believing is seeing: expectations alter visual awareness. Curr. Biol. 18, R697-R698 (2008).
20. Maus, G.W., Chaney, W., Liberman, A. & Whitney, D. The challenge of measuring long-term positive aftereffects. Curr. Biol. 23, R438-R439 (2013).
21. Kang, M.-S., Hong, S., Blake, R. & Woodman, G. Visual working memory contaminates perception. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 18, 860-869 (2011).
22. Swets, J.A. & Green, D.M. Sequential observations by human observers of signals in noise. in Information Theory (ed. Cherry, C.) 221-242 (Butterworths, London, 1961).
23. Maljkovic, V. & Nakayama, K. Priming of pop-out. I. Role of features. Mem. Cognit. 22, 657-672 (1994).
24. Kristjánsson, A. & Campana, G. Where perception meets memory: a review of repetition priming in visual search tasks. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 72, 5-18 (2010).
25. Treisman, A. & Kahneman, D. The accumulation of information within object files. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 21, 354 (1983).
26. Gibson, J.J. & Radner, M. Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies. J. Exp. Psychol. 20, 453-467 (1937).
27. Gibson, J.J. Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. II. Simultaneous contrast and the areal restriction of the after-effect. J. Exp. Psychol. 20, 553-569 (1937).
28. Spivey, M.J. & Spirn, M. Selective visual attention modulates the direct tilt aftereffect. Percept. Psychophys. 62, 1525-1533 (2000).
29. Knapen, T., Rolfs, M., Wexler, M. & Cavanagh, P. The reference frame of the tilt aftereffect. J. Vis. 10, 8 (2010).
30. Maunsell, J.H. & Treue, S. Feature-based attention in visual cortex. Trends Neurosci. 29, 317-322 (2006).
31. Stocker, A. & Simoncelli, E. Sensory adaptation within a Bayesian framework for perception. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems vol. 18 (eds. Weiss, Y., Schölkopf, B. & Platt, J.) 1291-1298 (MIT Press, 2006).
32. Sasaki, Y., Nanez, J.E. & Watanabe, T. Advances in visual perceptual learning and plasticity. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 53-60 (2010).
33. Fiser, J.z. & Aslin, R.N. Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 28, 458-467 (2002).
34. Chopin, A. & Mamassian, P. Predictive properties of visual adaptation. Curr. Biol. 22, 622-626 (2012).
35. Kahneman, D. & Treisman, A. Changing views of attention and automaticity. in Varieties of Attention (eds. Parusuraman, R. & Davies, D.R.) 29-61 (Academic Press, 1984).
36. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A. & Gibbs, B.J. The reviewing of object files - object-specific integration of information. Cognit. Psychol. 24, 175-219 (1992).
37. Noles, N.S., Scholl, B.J. & Mitroff, S.R. The persistence of object file representations. Percept. Psychophys. 67, 324-334 (2005).
38. Whitney, D. The influence of visual motion on perceived position. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 211-216 (2002).
39. Ross, H.E. & Plug, C. The history of size constancy and size illusions. in Perceptual Constancy: Why Things Look as They Do (eds. Walsh, V. & Kulikowski, J.) 499-528 (Cambridge University Press, 1998).
40. Palmer, S.E. Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology (The MIT press, 1999).
41. Kristjánsson, A., Wang, D. & Nakayama, K. The role of priming in conjunctive visual search. Cognition 85, 37-52 (2002).
42. Kristjánsson, A. Simultaneous priming along multiple feature dimensions in a visual search task. Vision Res. 46, 2554-2570 (2006).
43. Maljkovic, V. & Nakayama, K. Priming of pop-out. II. The role of position. Percept. Psychophys. 58, 977-991 (1996).
44. Geyer, T., Müller, H.J. & Krummenacher, J. Cross-trial priming in visual search for singleton conjunction targets: role of repeated target and distractor features. Percept. Psychophys. 68, 736-749 (2006).
45. Kim, N., Ivry, R.B. & Robertson, L.C. Sequential priming in hierarchically organized figures: effects of target level and target resolution. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 25, 715-729 (1999).
46. Simons, D.J. & Rensink, R.A. Change blindness: Past, present and future. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 16-20 (2005).
47. Rensink, R.A., O'Regan, J.K. & Clark, J.J. To see or not to see: the need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychol. Sci. 8, 368-373 (1997).
48. Rensink, R.A., O'Regan, J.K. & Clark, J.J. On the failure to detect changes in scenes across brief interruptions. Vis. Cogn. 7, 127-145 (2000).
49. Neisser, U. & Becklen, R. Selective looking: attending to visually specified events. Cognit. Psychol. 7, 480-494 (1975).
50. Simons, D.J. & Chabris, C.F. Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception 28, 1059-1074 (1999).
51. Mitchell, D.E. & Muir, D.W. Does the tilt after-effect occur in the oblique meridian? Vision Res. 16, 609-613 (1976).
52. Ringach, D.L., Shapley, R.M. & Hawken, M.J. Orientation selectivity in macaque V1: diversity and laminar dependence. J. Neurosci. 22, 5639-5651 (2002).