The initial interactions underlying binocular rivalry require visual awareness

Journal of Vision

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-9

  Hancock, Sarah ^a   Whitney, David ^b   Andrews, Timothy J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Binocular; Visual crowding

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AWARENESS; BINOCULAR VISION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL ADAPTATION;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; AWARENESS; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 38549124465     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/8.1.3     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aghdaee, S. M. (2005). Adaptation to spiral motion in crowding condition. Perception, 34, 155-162.
2. Alais, D. & Blake, R. (2005). Binocular rivalry. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
3. Andrews, T. J., & Lotto. R. B. (2004). Fusion and rivalry are dependent on the perceptual meaning of visual stimuli. Current Biology, 14, 418-423.
4. Blake, R., & Fox, R. (1974). Adaptation to invisible gratings and the site of binocular rivalry suppression. Nature, 249, 488-490.
5. Blake, R., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Reviews, Neuroscience, 3, 13-21.
6. Blake, R., Tadin, D., Sobel, K. V., Raissian, T. A., & Chong, S. C. (2006). Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 4783-4788.
7. Blakemore, C., & Campbell, F. W. (1969). On the existence of neurons in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. The Journal of Physiology, 203, 237-260.
8. Carlson, T. A., & He, S. (2004). Competing global representations fail to initiate binocular rivalry. Neuron, 43, 907-914.
9. Clifford, C. W. (2002). Perceptual adaptation: Motion parallels orientation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 136-143.
10. Dragoi, V., Sharma, J., & Sur, M. (2000). Adaptation induced plasticity of orientation tuning in adult visual cortex. Neuron, 28, 287-298.
11. Gibson, J. J., & Radner, M. (1937). Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 453-467.
12. Haynes, J. D., Deichmann, R., & Rees, G. (2005). Eyespecific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature, 438, 496-499.
13. He, S., Cavanagh, P., & Intriligator, J. (1996). Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness. Nature, 383, 334-337.
14. He, S., & MacLeod, D. I. (2001). Orientation-selective adaptation and tilt after-effect from invisible patterns. Nature, 411, 473-476.
15. Holmes, D. J., Hancock, S., & Andrews, T. J. (2006). Independent binocular integration for form and colour. Vision Research, 46, 665-677.
16. Huk, A. C., Ress. D. & Heeger. D. J. (2001). Neuronal basis of the motion aftereffect reconsidered. Neuron, 32, 161-172.
17. Kim. C Y., & Blake, R. (2005). Psychophysical magic: Rendering the visible 'invisible.' Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 381-388.
18. Lee. S. H., Blake, R., & Heeger, D. J. (2005). Traveling waves of activity in primary visual cortex during binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 22-23.
19. Lehmkuhle, S. W., & Fox, R. (1975). Effect of binocular rivalry suppression on the motion aftereffect. Vision Research, 15, 855-859.
20. Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (1996). Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature, 379, 549-553.
21. Moradi, F., Koch, C., & Shimojo, S. (2005). Face adaptation depends on seeing the face. Neuron, 45, 169-175.
22. Movshon, J. A., & Lennie, P. (1979). Pattern-selective adaptation in visual cortical neurones. Nature, 278, 950-952.
23. O'Shea, R. P., & Crassini, B. (1981). Interocular transfer of the motion after-effect is not reduced by binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 21, 801-804.
24. Pearson, J., & Clifford, C. W. (2005) Suppressed patterns after vision during binocular rivalry. Current Biology, 15, 2142-2148.
25. Polonsky, A., Blake, R., Braun, J., & Heeger, D. (2000). Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1153-1159.
26. Parkes, L., Lund, J., Angelucci, A., Solomon, J. A., & Morgan, M. (2001). Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 739-744.
27. Rajimehr, R., Montaser-Kouhsari, L., & Afraz, S. R. (2003). Orientation-selective adaptation to crowded illusory lines. Perception, 32, 1199-1210.
28. Rajimehr, R., Vaziri-Pashkam, M., Afraz, S. R., & Esteky, H. (2004). Adaptation to apparent motion in crowding condition. Vision Research, 44, 925-931.
29. Sengpiel, F., Blakemore, C., & Harrad, R. (1995). Interocular suppression in the primary visual, cortex: A possible neural basis of binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 35, 179-195.
30. Sheinberg, D. L., & Logothetis, N. K. (1997). The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 3408-3413.
31. Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Vaughan, T., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron, 21, 753-759.
32. Tong, F., & Engel, S. A. (2001). Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature, 411, 195-199.
33. Tong, F., Meng. M., & Blake, R. (2006). Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 502-511.
34. Théoret, H., Kobayashi., M., Ganis, G., Di Capua, P., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2002). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of human area MT/V5 disrupts perception and storage of the motion after effect. Neuropsychologia, 40, 2280-2287.
35. Vautin, R. G., & Berkley, M. A. (1977). Responses of single cells in cat visual cortex to prolonged stimulus movement: Neural correlates of visual aftereffects. Journal of Neurophysiology, 40, 1051-1065.
36. Wade, N. J., & Wenderoth, P. (1978). The influence of colour and contour rivalry on the magnitude of the tilt after-effect. Vision Research, 18, 827-835.
37. Watson, T. L., Pearson, J., & Clifford, C. W. (2004) Perceptual grouping of biological motion promotes binocular rivalry. Current Biology, 14, 1670-1674.
38. Wallach, H., & Adams, P. A. (1954). Binocular rivalry of achromatic colors. American Journal of Psychology, 67, 513-516.
39. Whitney, D. (2005). Motion distorts perceived position without awareness of motion. Current Biology, 15, R324-R326.
40. Wiesenfelder, H., & Blake, R. (1990). The neural site of binocular rivalry relative to the analysis of motion in the human visual system. Journal of Neuroscience, 10, 3880-3888.
41. Wilson, H. R. (2003). Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 14499-14503.
42. Wolfe, J. M. (1984). Reversing ocular dominance and supression in a single flash. Vision Research 24, 471-478.
43. Wunderlich, K. Schneider, K. A., & Kastner, S. (2005). Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1595-1602.