Why complex pelvic organ prolapse should be approached abdominally

Current Opinion in Urology

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 317-322

  Mueller, Elizabeth R ^a  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

enterocele; pelvic organ prolapse; robotic; sacrocolpopexy; uterine prolapse

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY; ABDOMINAL SACRAL HYSTEROPEXY; ABDOMINAL SACROCOLPOPEXY; ABDOMINAL UTEROSACRAL LIGAMENT SUSPENSION; BLEEDING; CYSTOSTOMY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DYSPAREUNIA; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; ILEUS; INCISIONAL HERNIA; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG EMBOLISM; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; OPERATION DURATION; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; REVIEW; SMALL INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; SURGICAL MESH; URETER INJURY; URINARY TRACT INFECTION;

FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL MESH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 84880117059     PISSN: 09630643     EISSN: 14736586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3283619f10     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Wu JM, Kawasaki A, Hundley AF, et al. Predicting the number of women who will undergo incontinence and prolapse surgery, 2010 to 2050. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205:e1.
2. Rooney K, Kenton K, Mueller ER, et al. Advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse is highly correlated with apical prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195:1837-1840.
3. Summers A, Winkel LA, Hussain HK, DeLancey JO. The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194:1438-1443.
4. Lane FE. Repair of posthysterectomy vaginal-vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 1962; 20:72-77.
5. Maher CM, Feiner B, Baessler K, Glazener CM. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review. Int Urogynecol J 2011; 22:1445-1457.
6. Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CM, Adams EJ, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. [update in Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(3):CD004014; PMID: 17636742]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (4):CD004014.
7. Benson JT, Lucente V, McClellan E. Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175:1418-1421.
8. Lo TS, Wang AC. Abdominal colposacropexy and sacrospinous ligament suspension for severe uterovaginal prolapse: a comparison.J Gyn Surg 1998; 14:59-64.
9. Maher CF, Qatwneh A, Dwyer PL, et al. Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse. A prospective randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190:20-26.
10. Elliott CS, Hsieh MH, Sokol ER, et al. Robot-assisted versus open sacro-colpopexy: a cost-minimization analysis. J Urol 2012; 187:638-643.
11. Hoyte LMSEE, Rabbanifard R, Mezzich J, et al. Cost analysis of open versus robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med 2012; 18:335-339.
12. Siddiqui NY, Geller EJ, Visco AG. Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year out-comes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206:435e1-435e5.
13. Geller EJ, Parnell BA, Dunivan GC. Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes. Urology 2012; 79:532-536.
14. Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, et al. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118:1005-1013.
15. Seror J, Yates DR, Seringe E, et al. Prospective comparison of short-term functional outcomes obtained after pure laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. World J Urol 2012; 30:393-398.
16. Anger JT, Mueller ER, Tarnay C, et al. Abdominal colpopexy: comparison of endoscopic surgical strategies. J Urol 2012; 187:e864.
17. Mueller ER, Kenton K, Tarnay C, et al. Abdominal colpopexy: comparison of endoscopic surgical strategies (ACCESS). Contemp Clin Trials 2012; 33:1011-1018.
18. Tarnay C, Kenton K, Anger JT, et al. Trocar site appearance one year after robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Neuro Urodyn 2013; 32:159.
19. Cvach K, Geoffrion R, Cundiff GW. Abdominal sacral hysteropexy: a pilot study comparing sacral hysteropexy to sacral colpopexy with hysterectomy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2012; 18:286-290.
20. Lowenstein L, Fitz A, Kenton K, et al. Transabdominal uterosacral suspension: outcomes and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200:656e1-656e5.
21. Barber MD, Visco AG, Weidner AC, Amundsen CL, Bump RC. Bilateral uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension with site-specific endopelvic fascia defect repair for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183:1402-1410.
22. Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104:805-823.
23. Cundiff GW, Varner E, Visco AG, et al. Risk factors for mesh/suture erosion following sacral colpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199:688e1-688e5.
24. Tate SB, Blackwell L, Lorenz DJ, et al. Randomized trial of fascia lata and polypropylene mesh for abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 5-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J 2011; 22:137-143.
25. Warner WB, Vora S, Alonge A, et al. Intraoperative and postoperative gastrointestinal complications associated with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med 2012; 18:321-324.
26. Abernethy M, Vasquez E, Kenton K, et al. Where do we place the sacro-colpopexy stitch? A magnetic resonance imaging investigation. Female Pelvic Medicine 2013; 19:31-33.
27. Rajamaheswari N, Agarwal S, Seethalakshmi K. Lumbosacral spondylodisci-tis: an unusual complication of abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J 2012; 23:375-377.
28. Grimes CL, Tan-Kim J, Garfin SR, Nager CW. Sacral colpopexy followed by refractory Candida albicans osteomyelitis and discitis requiring extensive spinal surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120 (2 Pt 2):464-468.