Subcellular and supracellular mechanical stress prescribes cytoskeleton behavior in Arabidopsis cotyledon pavement cells

eLife

Volumn 2014, Issue 3, 2014, Pages

  Sampathkumar, Arun ^a,b   Krupinski, Pawel ^c   Wightman, Raymond ^b   Milani, Pascale ^d   Berquand, Alexandre ^e   Boudaoud, Arezki ^d   Hamant, Olivier ^d   Jönsson, Henrik ^b,c   Meyerowitz, Elliot M ^a,b  

^a California Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^e BRUKER AXS GMBH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOLOGY; CELL SHAPE; CELL STRESS; CYTOSKELETON; ELASTICITY; EPIDERMIS CELL; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MECHANICAL STRESS; MECHANICS; MICROTUBULE; NONHUMAN; PAVEMENT CELL; PLANT CELL; SIMULATION;

EID: 84899646073     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2050084X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.01967.001     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Asnacios A, Hamant O. 2012. The mechanics behind cell polarity. Trends in Cell Biology 22:584-591. doi: 10.1016/j. tcb.2012.08.005.
2. Baluska F, Volkmann D, Barlow PW. 2004. Eukaryotic cells and their cell bodies: cell theory revised. Annals of Botany 94:9-32. doi: 10.1093/aob/mch109.
3. Baskin TI, Meekes HTHM, Liang BM, Sharp RE. 1999. Regulation of growth anisotropy in well-watered and water-stressed maize roots. II. Role of cortical microtubules and cellulose microfibrils. Plant Physiology 119:681-692. doi: 10.1104/pp.119.2.681.
4. Bichet A, Desnos T, Turner S, Grandjean O, Hofte H. 2001. BOTERO1 is required for normal orientation of cortical microtubules and anisotropic cell expansion in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal: for Cell and Molecular Biology 25:137-148. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.00946.x.
5. Bonet J, Wood RD. 1997. Nonlinear continuum mechanics for finite element analysis. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
6. Boudaoud A, Burian A, Borowska-Wykret D, Uyttewaal M, Wrzalik R, Kwiatkowska D, Hamant O. 2014. FibrilTool, an ImageJ plug-in to quantify fibrillar structures in raw microscopy images. Nature Protocols 9:457-463. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.024.
7. Bringmann M, Li E, Sampathkumar A, Kocabek T, Hauser M-T, Persson S. 2012. POM-POM2/cellulose synthase interacting1 is essential for the functional association of cellulose synthase and microtubules in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 24:163-177. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.093575.
8. CGAL. Computational geometry algorithms library. 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.cgal.org
9. Chan J, Crowell E, Eder M, Calder G, Bunnewell S, Findlay K, Vernhettes S, Hofte H, Lloyd C. 2010. The rotation of cellulose synthase trajectories is microtubule dependent and influences the texture of epidermal cell walls in Arabidopsis hypocotyls. Journal of Cell Science 123:3490-3495. doi: 10.1242/jcs.074641.
10. Chanliaud E, Burrows KM, Jeronimidis G, Gidley MJ. 2002. Mechanical properties of primary plant cell wall analogues. Planta 215:989-996. doi: 10.1007/s00425-002-0783-8.
11. Crowell EF, Timpano H, Desprez T, Franssen-Verheijen T, Emons AM, Hofte H, Vernhettes S. 2011. Differential regulation of cellulose orientation at the inner and outer face of epidermal cells in the Arabidopsis hypocotyl. The Plant Cell 23:2592-2605. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.087338.
12. Davis LJ, Odde DJ, Block SM, Gross SP. 2002. The importance of lattice defects in katanin-mediated microtubule severing in vitro. Biophysical Journal 82:2916-2927. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75632-4.
13. Derjaguin BV, Muller VM, Toporov YP. 1975. Effect of contact deformations on the adhesion of particles. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 53:314-326. doi: 10.1016/0021-9797(75)90018-1.
14. Díaz-Valencia JD, Morelli MM, Bailey M, Zhang D, Sharp DJ, Ross JL. 2011. Drosophila Katanin-60 Depolymerizes and Severs at microtubule defects. Biophysical Journal 100:2440-2449. doi: 10.1016/j. bpj.2011.03.062.
15. Dumais J, Steele CR. 2000. New evidence for the role of mechanical forces in the shoot apical meristem. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 19:7-18. doi: 10.1007/s003440000003.
16. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. 2006. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126:677-689. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044.
17. Franck AD, Powers AF, Gestaut DR, Gonen T, Davis TN, Asbury CL. 2007. Tension applied through the Dam1 complex promotes microtubule elongation providing a direct mechanism for length control in mitosis. Nature Cell Biology 9:832-837. doi: 10.1038/ncb1609.
18. Fu Y, Gu Y, Zheng Z, Wasteneys G, Yang Z. 2005. Arabidopsis interdigitating cell growth requires two antagonistic pathways with opposing action on cell morphogenesis. Cell 120:687-700. doi: 10.1016/j. cell.2004.12.026.
19. Fujita M, Himmelspach R, Hocart CH, Williamson RE, Mansfield SD, Wasteneys GO. 2011. Cortical microtubules optimize cell-wall crystallinity to drive unidirectional growth in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal: for Cell and Molecular Biology 66:915-928. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04552.x.
20. Gardner MK, Pearson CG, Sprague BL, Zarzar TR, Bloom K, Salmon ED, Odde DJ. 2005. Tension-dependent regulation of microtubule dynamics at kinetochores can explain metaphase congression in yeast. Molecular Biology of the Cell 16:3764-3775. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E05-04-0275.
21. Green PB. 1980. Organogenesis-a biophysical view. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 31:51-82. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.31.060180.000411.
22. Hamant O, Heisler MG, Jonsson H, Krupinski P, Uyttewaal M, Bokov P, Corson F, Sahlin P, Boudaoud A, Meyerowitz EM, Couder Y, Traas J. 2008. Developmental patterning by mechanical signals in Arabidopsis. Science 322:1650-1655. doi: 10.1126/science.1165594.
23. Hayot CM, Forouzesh E, Goel A, Avramova Z, Turner JA. 2012. Viscoelastic properties of cell walls of single living plant cells determined by dynamic nanoindentation. Journal of Experimental Botany 63:2525-2540. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err428.
24. Heisler MG, Hamant O, Krupinski P, Uyttewaal M, Ohno C, Jonsson H, Traas J, Meyerowitz EM. 2010. Alignment between PIN1 polarity and microtubule orientation in the shoot apical meristem reveals a tight coupling between morphogenesis and auxin transport. PLOS Biology 8:e1000516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000516.
25. Hutter JL, Bechhoefer J. 1993. Calibration of atomic-force microscope tips. Review of Scientific Instruments 64:1868-1873. doi: 10.1063/1.1143970.
26. Jacques E, Verbelen JP, Vissenberg K. 2013. Mechanical stress in Arabidopsis leaves orients microtubules in a 'continuous' supracellular pattern. BMC Plant Biology 13:163. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-163.
27. Jaeger J, Irons D, Monk N. 2008. Regulative feedback in pattern formation: towards a general relativistic theory of positional information. Development 135:3175-3183. doi: 10.1242/dev.018697.
28. Jonsson H, Heisler MG, Shapiro BE, Meyerowitz EM, Mjolsness E. 2006. An auxin-driven polarized transport model for phyllotaxis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103:1633-1638. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509839103.
29. Jung G, Wernicke W. 1990. Cell shaping and microtubules in developing mesophyll of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Protoplasma 153:141-148. doi: 10.1007/BF01353998.
30. Kaplan DR. 1992. The relationship of cells to organisms in plants: problem and Implications of an organismal perspective. International Journal of Plant Sciences 153:S28-S37. doi: 10.1086/297061.
31. Kierzkowski D, Nakayama N, Routier-Kierzkowska AL, Weber A, Bayer E, Schorderet M, Reinhardt D, Kuhlemeier C, Smith RS. 2012. Elastic domains regulate growth and organogenesis in the plant shoot apical meristem. Science 335:1096-1099. doi: 10.1126/science.1213100.
32. Kutschera U, Niklas KJ. 2007. The epidermal-growth-control theory of stem elongation: an old and a new perspective. Journal of Plant Physiology 164:1395-1409. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2007.08.002.
33. Lecuit T, Lenne PF. 2007. Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesis. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 8:633-644. doi: 10.1038/nrm2222.
34. Levy R, Maaloum M. 2002. Measuring the spring constant of atomic force microscope cantilevers: thermal fluctuations and other methods. Nanotechnology 13:33-37.
35. Lin D, Cao L, Zhou Z, Zhu L, Ehrhardt D, Yang Z, Fu Y. 2013. Rho GTPase signaling activates microtubule severing to promote microtubule ordering in arabidopsis. Current Biology: CB 23:290-297. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.022.
36. Lindeboom JJ, Nakamura M, Hibbel A, Shundyak K, Gutierrez R, Ketelaar T, Emons AMC, Mulder BM, Kirik V, Ehrhardt DW. 2013. A mechanism for reorientation of cortical microtubule arrays driven by microtubule severing. Science 342:1245533. doi: 10.1126/science.1245533.
37. Marcus AI, Moore RC, Cyr RJ. 2001. The role of microtubules in guard cell function. Plant Physiology 125:387-395. doi: 10.1104/pp.125.1.387.
38. Martin AC, Kaschube M, Wieschaus EF. 2009. Pulsed contractions of an actin-myosin network drive apical constriction. Nature 457:495-499. doi: 10.1038/nature07522.
39. Milani P, Gholamirad M, Traas J, Arneodo A, Boudaoud A, Argoul F, Hamant O. 2011. In vivo analysis of local wall stiffness at the shoot apical meristem in Arabidopsis using atomic force microscopy. The Plant Journal: for Cell and Molecular Biology 67:1116-1123. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04649.x.
40. Nezhad AS, Naghavi M, Packirisamy M, Bhat R, Geitmann A. 2013. Quantification of the Young's modulus of the primary plant cell wall using Bending-Lab-On-Chip (BLOC). Lab on a Chip 13:2599-2608. doi: 10.1039/c3lc00012e.
41. Nicklas RB. 1988. The forces that move chromosomes in mitosis. Annual Review of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry 17:431-449. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.17.060188.002243.
42. Paredez AR, Somerville CR, Ehrhardt DW. 2006. Visualization of cellulose synthase demonstrates functional association with microtubules. Science 312:1491-1495. doi: 10.1126/science.1126551.
43. Pouille PA, Ahmadi P, Brunet AC, Farge E. 2009. Mechanical signals trigger Myosin II redistribution and mesoderm invagination in Drosophila embryos. Science Signaling 2:ra16. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000098.
44. Roeder AH, Chickarmane V, Cunha A, Obara B, Manjunath BS, Meyerowitz EM. 2010. Variability in the control of cell division underlies sepal epidermal patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLOS Biology 8:e1000367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000367.
45. Roeder AH, Cunha A, Ohno CK, Meyerowitz EM. 2012. Cell cycle regulates cell type in the Arabidopsis sepal. Development 139:4416-4427. doi: 10.1242/dev.082925.
46. Schopfer P. 2006. Biomechanics of plant growth. American Journal of Botany 93:1415-1425. doi: 10.3732/ ajb.93.10.1415.
47. Sherrard K, Robin F, Lemaire P, Munro E. 2010. Sequential activation of apical and basolateral contractility drives ascidian endoderm invagination. Current Biology: CB 20:1499-1510. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.075.
48. Shraiman BI. 2005. Mechanical feedback as a possible regulator of tissue growth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102:3318-3323. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404782102.
49. Skibbens R, Skeen V, Salmon E. 1993. Directional instability of kinetochore motility during chromosome congression and segregation in mitotic newt lung cells: a push-pull mechanism. The Journal of Cell Biology 122:859-875. doi: 10.1083/jcb.122.4.859.
50. Sneddon IN. 1965. The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. International Journal of Engineering Science 3:47-57. doi:10.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-4.
51. Solon J, Kaya-Copur A, Colombelli J, Brunner D. 2009. Pulsed forces timed by a ratchet-like mechanism drive directed tissue movement during dorsal closure. Cell 137:1331-1342. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.050.
52. Stylianopoulos T, Martin JD, Chauhan VP, Jain SR, Diop-Frimpong B, Bardeesy N, Smith BL, Ferrone CR, Hornicek FJ, Boucher Y, Munn LL, Jain RK. 2012. Causes, consequences, and remedies for growth-induced solid stress in murine and human tumors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109:15101-15108. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213353109.
53. Suslov D, Verbelen JP, Vissenberg K. 2009. Onion epidermis as a new model to study the control of growth anisotropy in higher plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 60:4175-4187. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp251.
54. Thery M, Jimenez-Dalmaroni A, Racine V, Bornens M, Julicher F. 2007. Experimental and theoretical study of mitotic spindle orientation. Nature 447:493-496.
55. Trushko A, Schaffer E, Howard J. 2013. The growth speed of microtubules with XMAP215-coated beads coupled to their ends is increased by tensile force. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110:14670-14675. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218053110.
56. Uyttewaal M, Burian A, Alim K, Landrein B, Borowska-Wykret D, Dedieu A, Peaucelle A, Ludynia M, Traas J, Boudaoud A, Kwiatkowska D, Hamant O. 2012. Mechanical stress acts via katanin to amplify differences in growth rate between adjacent cells in Arabidopsis. Cell 149:439-451. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.048.
57. Wartlick O, Kicheva A, Gonzalez-Gaitan M. 2009. Morphogen gradient formation. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 1:a001255. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001255.
58. Weiss JA, Maker BN, Govindjee S. 1996. Finite element implementation of incompressible, transversely isotropic hyperelasticity. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 135:107-128. doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(96)01035-3.
59. Wightman R, Chomicki G, Kumar M, Carr P, Turner SR. 2013. SPIRAL2 determines plant microtubule organization by modulating microtubule severing. Current Biology: CB 23:1902-1907. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.061.
60. Wightman R, Turner SR. 2007. Severing at sites of microtubule crossover contributes to microtubule alignment in cortical arrays. The Plant Journal: for Cell and Molecular Biology 52:742-751. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03271.x.
61. Williamson RE. 1990. Alignment of cortical microtubules by anisotropic wall stresses. Functional Plant Biology 17:601-613.
62. Wolpert L. 1969. Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 25:1-47. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5193(69)80016-0.
63. Xu T, Wen M, Nagawa S, Fu Y, Chen JG, Wu MJ, Perrot-Rechenmann C, Friml J, Jones AM, Yang Z. 2010. Cell surface-and rho GTPase-based auxin signaling controls cellular interdigitation in Arabidopsis. Cell 143:99-110. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.003.
64. Yang Z. 2008. Cell polarity signaling in Arabidopsis. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 24:551-575. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.23.090506.123233.
65. Zhang C, Halsey LE, Szymanski DB. 2011. The development and geometry of shape change in Arabidopsis thaliana cotyledon pavement cells. BMC Plant Biology 11:27. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-27.
66. Zhang Q, Fishel E, Bertroche T, Dixit R. 2013. Microtubule severing at crossover sites by katanin generates ordered cortical microtubule arrays in arabidopsis. Current Biology 23:2191-2195. doi: 10.1016/j. cub.2013.09.018.
67. Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL, Zhu JZ. 2005. The finite element method: its basis and fundamentals. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann.