Patients with proximal junctional kyphosis requiring revision surgery have higher postoperative lumbar lordosis and larger sagittal balance corrections

Spine

Volumn 39, Issue 9, 2014, Pages

  Kim, Han Jo ^a   Bridwell, Keith H ^b   Lenke, Lawrence G ^b   Park, Moon Soo ^c   Song, Kwang Sup ^d   Piyaskulkaew, Chaiwat ^e   Chuntarapas, Tapanut ^e  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

^b BARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c Hallym University   (South Korea)

^d Chung Ang University   (South Korea)

^e WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

proximal junctional kyphosis; revision surgery; sagittal balance; spinopelvic parameters

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COBB ANGLE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KYPHOSIS; LORDOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROXIMAL JUNCTIONAL KYPHOSIS; RISK FACTOR; SCOLIOSIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; AGED; CASE CONTROL STUDY; DEVICES; FEMALE; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MALE; RADIOGRAPHY; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; KYPHOSIS; LORDOSIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84899623481     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000246     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Glattes RC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity following long instrumented posterior spinal fusion: incidence, outcomes, and risk factor analysis. Spine 2005; 30: 1643-9.
2. Kim HJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Proximal junctional kypho-sis results in inferior SRS pain subscores in adult deformity patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38: 896-901.
3. Kim HJ, Lenke LG, Shaffrey CI, et al. Proximal junctional kypho-sis as a distinct form of adjacent segment pathology after spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37 (22 suppl): S144-64.
4. Sacramento-Dominguez C, Vayas-Diez R, Coll-Mesa L, et al. Reproducibility measuring the angle of proximal junctional kypho-sis using the first or the second vertebra above the upper instrumented vertebrae in patients surgically treated for scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 2787-91.
5. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Proximal junctional kypho-sis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine 2005; 30: 2045-50.
6. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum five-year follow-up. Spine 2008; 33: 2179-84.
7. Kim HJ, Yagi M, Nyugen J, et al. Combined anterior-posterior surgery is the most important risk factor for developing proximal junctional kyphosis in idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470: 1633-9.
8. Lee GA, Betz RR, Clements DH III, et al. Proximal kyphosis after posterior spinal fusion in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999; 24: 795-9.
9. Wang J, Zhao Y, Shen B, et al. Risk factor analysis of proximal junctional kyphosis after posterior fusion in patients with idio-pathic scoliosis. Injury 2010; 41: 415-20.
10. Helgeson MD, Shah SA, Newton PO, et al. Evaluation of proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following pedicle screw, hook, or hybrid instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: 177-81.
11. Yagi M, Akilah KB, Boachie-Adjei O. Incidence, risk factors and classification of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36: E60-8.
12. Schwab F, Lafage V, Patel A, et al. Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 1828-33.
13. Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, et al. Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: 2224-31.
14. Lafage V, Schwab F, Patel A, et al. Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: E599-606.
15. Lafage V, Schwab F, Skalli W, et al. Standing balance and sagittal plane spinal deformity: analysis of spinopelvic and gravity line parameters. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008; 33: 1572-8.
16. Rose PS, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Role of pelvic incidence, thoracic kyphosis, and patient factors on sagittal plane correction following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 785-91.
17. Hammerberg EM, Wood KB. Sagittal profile of the elderly. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003; 16: 44-50.
18. Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995; 20: 1351-8.
19. Vedantam R, Lenke LG, Keeney JA, et al. Comparison of standing sagittal spinal alignment in asymptomatic adolescents and adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998; 23: 211-5.
20. Hassanzadeh H, Gupta S, Jain A, et al. Kebaish type of anchor at the proximal fusion level has a significant effect on the incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis and outcome in adults after long posterior spinal fusion. Spine Deformity 2013; 1: 299-305.