Standing balance and sagittal plane spinal deformity analysis of spinopelvic and gravity line parameters

Spine

Volumn 33, Issue 14, 2008, Pages 1572-1578

  Lafage, Virginie ^a   Schwab, Frank ^a   Skalli, Wafa ^b   Hawkinson, Nicola ^a   Gagey, Pierre Marie ^c   Ondra, Stephen ^d   Farcy, Jean Pierre ^a  

^a NYU HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES   (United States)

^b LABORATOIRE DE BIOMÉCANIQUE   (France)

^c l'Hay les roses   (France)

^d Northwester Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Force plate; Gravity line; Sagittal balance; Spinal alignment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOOT AMPUTATION; GRAVITY; HUMAN; KYPHOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE MALFORMATION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; STANDING; ADOLESCENT; BIOMECHANICS; BODY EQUILIBRIUM; BODY POSTURE; FOOT; LORDOSIS; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PELVIS; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; FOOT; GRAVITATION; HUMANS; KYPHOSIS; LORDOSIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCULOSKELETAL EQUILIBRIUM; PELVIS; POSTURE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINE;

EID: 50649105558     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817886a2     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine 1995; 20:1351-8.
2. Hammerberg EM, Wood KB. Sagittal profile of the elderly. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:44-50.
3. Jackson RP, McManus AC. Radiographic analysis of sagittal plane alignment and balance in standing volunteers and patients with low back pain matched for age, sex, and size. A prospective controlled clinical study. Spine1994;19:1611-8.
4. McLean IP, Gillan MG, Ross JC, et al. A comparison of methods for measuring trunk list. A simple plumbline is the best. Spine 1996;21:1667-70.
5. During J, Goudfrooij H, Keessen W, et al. Toward standards for posture. Postural characteristics of the lower back system in normal and pathologic conditions. Spine 1985;10:83-7.
6. Jackson RP, Peterson MD, McManus AC, et al. Compensatory spinopelvic balance over the hip axis and better reliability in measuring lordosis to the pelvic radius on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and patients. Spine 1998;23:1750-67.
7. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, et al. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 1998;7:99-103.
8. Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, Roussouly P, et al. Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005;18:40-7.
9. Jackson RP, Hales C. Congruent spinopelvic alignment on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers. Spine 2000;25:2808-15.
10. Schwab F, Lafage V, Boyce R, et al. Gravity line analysis in adult volunteers: age-related correlation with spinal parameters, pelvic parameters, and foot position. Spine 2006;31:E959-E967.
11. Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L, et al. Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:260-7.
12. Labelle H, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, et al. The importance of spinopelvic balance in L5-S1 developmental spondylolisthesis: a review of pertinent radiologic measurements. Spine 2005;30:S27-S34.
13. Rajnics P, Templier A, Skalli W, et al. The association of sagittal spinal and pelvic parameters in asymptomatic persons and patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2002;15:24-30.
14. Vialle R, Ilharreborde B, Dauzac C, et al. Intra and inter-observer reliability of determining degree of pelvic incidence in high-grade spondylolisthesis using a computer assisted method. Eur Spine J 2006;15:1449-53.
15. Dubousset J. Three-dimensional analysis of the scoliotic deformity. In: Weinsteid SL, ed. The Pediatric Spine: Principles and Practice. NY: Raven Press; 1994.
16. Horton WC, Brown CW, Bridwell KH, et al. Is there an optimal patient stance for obtaining a lateral 36" radiograph? A critical comparison of three techniques. Spine 2005;30:427-33.
17. El Fegoun AB, Schwab F, Gamez L, et al. Center of gravity and radiographic posture analysis: a preliminary review of adult volunteers and adult patients affected by scoliosis. Spine 2005;30:1535-40.
18. Schwab F, Lafage V, Boyce R, et al. Gravity Line analysis in adult volunteers: age-related correlation with spinal parameters, pelvic parameters and foot position. Spine 2006;31:E959-E967.
19. MarksMC,StanfordCF,MaharAT,et al. Standing lateral radiographic positioning does not represent customary standing balance. Spine 2003;28:1176-82.
20. Rillardon L, Levassor N, Guigui P, et al. [Validation of a tool to measure pelvic and spinal parameters of sagittal balance]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2003;89:218-27.
21. Toupet M, Gagey PM, Heuschen S. Vestibular patients and aging subjects lose use of visual input and expend more energy in static postural control. In: Vellas B, Toupet M, Rubenstein L, et al, eds. Falls, Balance and Gait Disorders in the Elderly. Paris: Elsevier; 1992:183-98.
22. Skalli W, Zeller RD, Miladi L, et al. Importance of pelvic compensation in posture and motion after posterior spinal fusion using CD instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006;31:E359-E366.