Digital mammography screening with photon-counting technique: Can a high diagnostic performance be realized at low mean glandular dose

Radiology

Volumn 271, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 345-355

  Weigel, Stefanie ^a   Berkemeyer, Shoma ^a   Girnus, Ralf ^a   Sommer, Alexander ^a   Lenzen, Horst ^a   Heindel, Walter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER DETECTION RATE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SPECIFIC TUMOR PROPORTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; DIRECT RADIOGRAPHY PHOTON COUNTING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; ONCOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIATION DOSE; RECALL RATE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTONS; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84899583782     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13131181     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. McCullagh JB, Baldelli P, Phelan N. Clinical dose performance of full field digital mammography in a breast screening programme. Br J Radiol 2011;84(1007):1027-1033.
2. Hauge IHR, Pedersen K, Sanderud A, Hofvind S, Olerud HM. Patient doses from screen-film and full-field digital mammography in a population-based screening programme. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2012;148(1):65-73.
3. Aslund M, Cederström B, Lundqvist M, Danielsson M. Physical characterization of a scanning photon counting digital mammography system based on Si-strip detectors. Med Phys 2007;34(6):1918-1925.
4. Karellas A. Photon-counting digital mammography: evaluation of performance under clinically relevant conditions. Acad Radiol 2012;19(8):913-915.
5. Heddson B, Rönnow K, Olsson M, Miller D. Digital versus screen-film mammography: a retrospective comparison in a populationbased screening program. Eur J Radiol 2007;64(3):419-425.
6. Juel IM, Skaane P, Hoff SR, Johannessen G, Hofvind S. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography in a population-based screening program: the Sogn and Fjordane study. Acta Radiol 2010;51(9):962-968.
7. Cole EB, Toledano AY, Lundqvist M, Pisano ED. Comparison of radiologist performance with photon-counting full-field digital mammography to conventional fullfield digital mammography. Acad Radiol 2012;19(8):916-922.
8. Keavey E, Phelan N, O'Connell AM, et al. Comparison of the clinical performance of three digital mammography systems in a breast cancer screening programme. Br J Radiol 2012;85(1016):1123-1127.
9. Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, eds. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. 4th ed. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2006.
10. Weigel S, Biesheuvel C, Berkemeyer S, Kugel H, Heindel W. Digital mammography screening: how many breast cancers are additionally detected by bilateral ultrasound examination during assessment? Eur Radiol 2013;23(3):684-691.
11. Weigel S, Decker T, Korsching E, et al. Minimal invasive biopsy results of "uncertain malignant potential" in digital mammography screening: high prevalence but also high predictive value for malignancy. Rofo 2011;183(8):743-748.
12. Dance DR, Skinner CL, Young KC, Beckett JR, Kotre CJ. Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. Phys Med Biol 2000;45(11):3225-3240.
13. Dance DR, Young KC, van Engen RE. Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the United Kingdom, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols. Phys Med Biol 2009;54(14):4361-4372.
14. Heidinger O, Batzler WU, Krieg V, et al. The incidence of interval cancers in the German mammography screening program: results from the population-based cancer registry in North Rhine-Westphalia. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2012;109(46):781-787.
15. Del Turco MR, Mantellini P, Ciatto S, et al. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189(4):860-866.
16. Vigeland E, Klaasen H, Klingen TA, Hofvind S, Skaane P. Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County study. Eur Radiol 2008;18(1):183-191.
17. Bluekens AM, Holland R, Karssemeijer N, Broeders MJM, den Heeten GJ. Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study. Radiology 2012;265(3):707-714.
18. Nederend J, Duijm LEM, Louwman MWJ, Groenewoud JH, Donkers-van Rossum AB, Voogd AC. Impact of transition from analog screening mammography to digital screening mammography on screening outcome in the Netherlands: a population-based study. Ann Oncol 2012;23(12):3098-3103.
19. Weigel S, Decker T, Korsching E, Hungermann D, Böcker W, Heindel W. Calcifications in digital mammographic screening: improvement of early detection of invasive breast cancers? Radiology 2010;255(3):738-745.
20. Hofvind S, Skaane P. Stage distribution of breast cancer diagnosed before and after implementation of populationbased mammographic screening. Rofo 2012;184(5):437-442.
21. de Gelder R, Heijnsdijk EAM, van Ravesteyn NT, Fracheboud J, Draisma G, de Koning HJ. Interpreting overdiagnosis estimates in population-based mammography screening. Epidemiol Rev 2011;33(1):111-121.
22. Chiarelli AM, Edwards SA, Prummel MV, et al. Digital compared with screen-film mammography: performance measures in concurrent cohorts within an organized breast screening program [Epub ahead of print]. Radiology 2013;268(3):684-693.
23. Sala M, Salas D, Belvis F, et al. Reduction in false-positive results after introduction of digital mammography: analysis from four population-based breast cancer screening programs in Spain. Radiology 2011;258(2):388-395.
24. Timmers JM, den Heeten GJ, Adang EM, Otten JD, Verbeek AL, Broeders MJ. Dutch digital breast cancer screening: implications for breast cancer care. Eur J Public Health 2012;22(6):925-929.
25. Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, et al. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2013;267(1):47-56.