Digital mammography screening: How many breast cancers are additionally detected by bilateral ultrasound examination during assessment?

European Radiology

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 684-691

  Weigel, Stefanie ^a   Biesheuvel, Cornelis ^a   Berkemeyer, Shoma ^a   Kugel, Harald ^a   Heindel, Walter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast ultrasound; Digital mammography screening; Early detection of cancer; Predictive value of tests

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANTHROPOMETRIC PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DENSITY; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER GRADING; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SIZE; CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY DEVICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MAMMOGRAPHY SYSTEM; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TUMOR INVASION;

EID: 84878603705     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2664-2     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C et al (2006) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis, 4th edn. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
2. World Health Organization and International Agency for Research on Cancer (2002) IARC handbooks of cancer prevention, vol 7: breast cancer screening. IARC, Lyon. Available via http://www.iarc.fr/en/publications/pdfs-online/prev/ handbook7/Handbook7-Breast-0.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2012
3. US Preventive Services Task Force (2009) Screening for breast cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 151:716-726
4. Porter GJ, Evans AJ, Cornford EJ et al (2007) Influence of mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected and interval invasive breast cancers on pathologic features, mammographic features, and patient survival. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:676-683
5. Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL et al (2000) Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Nat Cancer Inst 92:1081-1087
6. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ et al (2007) Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:227-236
7. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB et al (2008) Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 299:2151-2163
8. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS et al (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233:830-849
9. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (2002) Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225:165-175
10. McCavert M, O'Donnell ME, Aroori S et al (2009) Ultrasound is a useful adjunct to mammography in the assessment of breast tumours in all patients. Int J Clin Pract 63:1589-1594
11. Corsetti V, Houssami N, Ghirardi M et al (2011) Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up. Eur J Cancer 47:1021-1026
12. Kaplan SS (2001) Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 221:641-649
13. Crystal P, Strano SD, Shcharynski S, Koretz MJ (2003) Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:177-182
14. Buchberger W, Niehoff A, Obrist P, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Dünser M (2000) Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 21:325-336
15. Albert US, Altland H, Duda V et al (2009) 2008 update of the guideline: early detection of breast cancer in Germany. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 135:339-354
16. Bevers TB, Anderson BO, Bonaccio E et al (2009) NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer screening and diagnosis. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 7:1060-1096
17. D'Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, Berg WA et al (2003) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS - mammography, 4th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston
18. Ciatto S, Visioli C, Paci E, Zappa M (2004) Breast density as a determinant of interval cancer at mammographic screening. Br J Cancer 90:393-396
19. Nothacker M, Duda V, Hahn M et al (2009) Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review. BMC Cancer 9:335
20. Leconte I, Feger C, Galant C et al (2003) Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:1675-1679
21. Corsetti V, Houssami N, Ferrari A et al (2008) Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost. Eur J Cancer 44:539-544
22. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E et al (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353:1773-1783
23. Törnberg S, Kemetli L, Ascunce N et al (2010) A pool analysis of interval cancer rates in six European countries. Eur J Cancer Prev 19:87-93
24. Ciatto S, Houssami N, Ambrogetti D, Bonardi R, Collini G, Del Turco MR (2007) Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 105:37-43
25. Lin X, Wang J, Han F, Fu J, Li A (2011) Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound. Eur J Radiol 81:873-878
26. Kavanagh AM, Byrnes GB, Nickson C et al (2008) Using mammographic density to improve breast cancer screening outcomes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 17:2818-2824
27. Müller-Schimpfle MP, Heindel W, Kettritz U, Schulz-Wendtland R, Bick U (2010) Consensus meeting of course directors in breast imaging, 9 May 2009, in Frankfurt am Main - topic: masses. Rofo 182:671-675