Evidence for selection on a CONSTANS-like gene between two red oak species

Annals of Botany

Volumn 113, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 967-975

  Lind Riehl, Jennifer F ^a   Sullivan, Alexis R ^a,b   Gailing, Oliver ^a  

^a MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

CONSTANS like genes; Divergent selection; Ecological speciation; Flowering time; Q. ellipsoidalis; Quercus rubra; Red oak; Speciation genes

Indexed keywords

DECIDUOUS TREE; DROUGHT STRESS; FLOWERING; GENE FLOW; GENETIC MARKER; GENOMICS; PHENOLOGY; PHOTOPERIOD; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); ADAPTATION; DICOTYLEDON; DROUGHT RESISTANCE; GENE EXPRESSION; POLYMORPHISM;

CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; OAK; PLANT GENE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

GENES, PLANT; QUERCUS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

QUERCUS; QUERCUS ELLIPSOIDALIS; QUERCUS RUBRA;

EID: 84899582714     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcu019     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Abrams MD. 1988. Comparativewater relations of three successional hardwood species in central Wisconsin. Tree Physiology 4: 263-273.
2. Abrams MD. 1990. Adaptations and responses to drought in Quercus species of North America. Tree Physiology 7: 227-238.
3. Alberto FJ, Derory J, Boury C, Frigerio J-M, Zimmermann NE, Kremer A. 2013. Imprints of natural selection along environmental gradients in phenology-related genes of Quercus petraea. Genetics 195: 495-512.
4. Aldrich PR, Michler CH, Sun WL, Romero-Severson J. 2002. Microsatellite markers for northern red oak (Fagaceae: Quercus rubra). Molecular Ecology Notes 2: 472-474. (Pubitemid 35436719)
5. Almada R, Cabrera N, Casaretto J, Ruiz-Lara S, González Villanueva E. 2009. VvCO and VvCOL1, two CONSTANS homologous genes, are regulated during flower induction and dormancy in grapevine buds. Plant Cell Reporter 28: 1193-1203.
6. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, et al. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 3389-3402. (Pubitemid 27359211)
7. Amasino RM. 2005. Vernalization and flowering time. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 16:154-158.
8. Antao T, Lopes A, Lopes R, Beja-Pereira A, Luikart G. 2008. LOSITAN: a workbench to detect molecular adaptation based on a Fst-outlier method. BMC Bioinformatics 9: 323.
9. Beaumont M, Nichols R. 1996. Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 263: 1619-1626. (Pubitemid 27055553)
10. Barluenga M, Stölting KN, Salzburger W, Muschick M, Meyer A. 2006. Sympatric speciation in Nicaraguan crater lake cichlid fish. Nature 439: 719-723. (Pubitemid 43237617)
11. Böhlenius H, Huang T, Charbonnel-Campaa L, et al. 2006. CO/FT regulatory module controls timing of flowering and seasonal growth cessation in trees. Science 312: 1040-1043.
12. Burns RM, Honkala BH. 1990. Silvics of North AmericaVolume 2: hardwoods. Washington, DC: United States Forest Service.
13. Cavender-Bares J, Pahlich A. 2009. Molecular, morphological, and ecological niche differentiation of sympatric sister oak species, Quercus virginiana and Q. geminata (Fagaceae). American Journal of Botany 96: 1690-1702.
14. Chesnoiu E, Sofletea N, Curtu AL, Toader A, Radu R, Enescu M. 2009. Bud burst and flowering phenology in a mixed oak forest from Eastern Romania. Annals of Forest Research 52: 199-206.
15. Curtu A, Gailing O, Finkeldey R. 2009. Patterns of contemporary hybridization inferred from paternity analysis in a four-oak-species forest. BMC Evolutionary Biology 9: 284.
16. Ducousso A, Guyon J, Kremer A. 1996. Latitudinal and altitudinal variation of bud burst in western populations of sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt) Liebl). Annals of Forest Science 53: 775-782. (Pubitemid 27206053)
17. Durand J, Bodenes C, Chancerel E, et al. 2010. A fast and cost-effective approach to develop and map EST-SSR markers: oak as a case study. BMC Genomics 11: 570.
18. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. 2005. Detecting the numberof clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology 14: 2611-2620. (Pubitemid 40886055)
19. Fabbrini F, Gaudet M, Bastien C, et al. 2012. Phenotypic plasticity, QTL mapping and genomic characterization of bud set in black poplar. BMC Plant Biology 12: 47.
20. Gailing O. 2013. Difference in growth, survival and phenology in Q. rubra and Q. ellipsoidalis seedlings. Dendrobiology 70: 71-79.
21. Gailing O, Lind J, Lilleskov E. 2012. Leaf morphological and genetic differentiation betweenQuercus rubra L. and Q. ellipsoidalis E. J. Hill populations in contrasting environments. Plant Systematics and Evolution 298: 1533-1545.
22. Goicoechea PG, Petit RJ, Kremer A. 2012. Detecting the footprints of divergent selection in oaks with linked markers. Heredity 109: 361-371.
23. Griffiths S, Dunford RP, Coupland G, Laurie DA. 2003. The evolution of CONSTANS-like gene families in barley, rice, and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 131: 1855-1867. (Pubitemid 36499782)
24. Haerty W, Golding GB. 2010. Low-complexity sequences and single amino acid repeats: not just 'junk' peptide sequences. Genome 53: 753-762.
25. Herrmann D, Barre P, Santoni S, Julier B. 2010. Association of a CONSTANS-like gene to flowering and height in autotetraploid alfalfa. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 121: 865-876.
26. Hokanson SC, Isebrands JG, Jensen RJ, HancockJF. 1993. Isozyme variation in oaks of the Apostle Islands inWisconsin: genetic structure and levels of inbreeding in Quercus rubra and Q. ellipsoidalis (Fagaceae). Amercian Journal of Botany 80: 1349-1357.
27. Hsu C-Y, Adams JP, No K, et al. 2012. Overexpression of CONSTANS homologs CO1 and CO2 fails to alter normal reproductive onset and fall bud set in woody perennial poplar. PLoS One 7: e45448.
28. Huang X, Madan A. 1999. CAP3:ADNAsequence assembly program. Genome Research 9: 868-877.
29. Langella O. 1999. Populations 1. 2. 30: a population genetic software. CNRS UPR9034.
30. Ledger S, Strayer C, Ashton F, Kay SA, Putterill J. 2001. Analysis of the function of two circadian-regulated CONSTANS-like genes. The Plant Journal 26: 15-22. (Pubitemid 32489180)
31. Lepais O, Gerber S. 2011. Reproductive patterns shape introgression dynamics and species succession within the European white oak species complex. Evolution 65: 156-170.
32. Lind JF, Gailing O. 2013. Genetic structure of Quercus rubra L and Quercus ellipsoidalis E. J. Hill populations at gene-based EST-SSR and nuclear SSR markers. Tree Genetics and Genomes 9: 707-722.
33. Ma X-F, Hall D, St Onge KR, Jansson S, Invgarsson PK. 2010. Genetic differentiation, clinal variation, and phenotypic associations with growth cessation across the Populus tremula photoperiodic pathway Genetics 186: 1033-1044.
34. Motzkin G, Ciccarello SC, Foster DR. 2002. Frost pockets on a level sand plain: does variation in microclimate help maintain persistent vegetation patterns? Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 129: 154-163.
35. Nielsen E, Hemmer-Hansen J, Poulsen N, et al. 2009. Genomic signatures of local directional selection in a high gene flow marine organism; the Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). BMC Evolutionary Biology 9: 276.
36. Nosil P, Funk DJ, Ortiz-Barrientos D. 2009. Divergent selection and heterogeneous genomic divergence. Molecular Ecology 18: 375-402.
37. Peakall ROD, Smouse PE. 2006. GenAlEx 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288-295.
38. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, DonnellyP. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
39. Raymond M, Rousset F. 1995. GenePop (Version-1. 2) - population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86: 248-249.
40. Rundle HD, Nosil P. 2005. Ecological speciation. Ecology Letters 8: 336-352. (Pubitemid 40393919)
41. Savolainen V, Anstett M-C, Lexer C, et al. 2006. Sympatric speciation in palms on an oceanic island. Nature 441: 210-213.
42. Schlötterer C, Dieringer D. 2005. A novel test statistic for the identification of local selective sweeps based on microsatellite gene diversity. In: Nurminsky D, ed. Selective sweep. Georgetown, TX: Landes Bioscience, 55-64.
43. Schluter D. 2000. The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. Schluter D. 2009. Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternative. Science 323: 737-741.
45. Scotti-Saintagne C, Mariette S, Porth I, et al. 2004. Genomescanning for interspecific differentiation between two closely related oak species [Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. ]. Genetics 168: 1615-1626. (Pubitemid 40007373)
46. Servedio MR, Doorn GSV, Kopp M, Frame AM, Nosil P. 2011. Magic traits in speciation: magic but not rare? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26: 389-397.
47. Steinkellner H, Lexer C, Turetschek E, Glössl J. 1997. Conservation of (GA)n microsatellite loci between Quercus species. Molecular Ecology 6: 1189-1194. (Pubitemid 28012436)
48. Storz J. 2005. Using genome scans of DNA polymorphism to infer adaptive population divergence. Molecular Ecology 14: 671-688. (Pubitemid 40346460)
49. Sullivan A, Lind JF, McCleary T, Romero-Severson J, Gailing O. 2013. Development and characterization of genomic and gene-based microsatellite markers in North American red oak species. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 31: 231-239.
50. Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P. 2004. MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 535-538. (Pubitemid 39147523)
51. Via S. 2012. Divergence hitchhiking and the spread of genomic isolation during ecological speciation-with-gene-flow. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367: 451-460.
52. Yuceer C, Harkess RL, Land SB Jr, Luthe DS. 2002. Structure and developmental regulation of CONSTANS-LIKE genes isolated from Populus deltoides. Plant Science 163: 615-625.