Identifying emerging topics by combining direct citation and co-citation

Proceedings of ISSI 2013 - 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2013, Pages 928-940

  Small, Henry ^a   Boyack, Kevin W ^a   Klavans, Richard ^a  

^a SciTech Strategies Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER MODELS; CROSS SECTIONAL ANALYSIS; DIFFERENCE FUNCTIONS; EMERGING TOPICS; MOTIVE FORCES; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY; TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION;

EID: 84896819811     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Bettencourt, L. M. A., Kaiser, D. I., Kaur, J., Castillo-Chavez, C., & Wojick, D. (2008). Population modeling of the emergence and development of scientific fields. Scientometrics, 75(3), 495-518.
2. Blei, D. M., & Lafferty, J. D. (2007). A correlated topic model of science. Annals of Applied Statistics, 1(1), 17-35.
3. Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389-2404.
4. Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359-377.
5. Chen, C., Hu, Z., Liu, S., & Tseng, H. (2012). Emerging topics in regenerative medicine: A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 12(5), 593-608.
6. Garfield, E., Sher, I. H., & Torpie, R. J. (1964). The use of citation data in writing the history of science. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information.
7. Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2011). Using global mapping to create more accurate document-level maps of research fields. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 1-18.
8. Morris, S. A., Yen, G., Wu, Z., & Asnake, B. (2003). Time line visualization of research fronts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 413-422.
9. Novoselov, K. S., Geim, A. K., Morozov, S. V., Jiang, D., Zhang, Y., Dubonos, S. V., et al. (2004). Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science, 306(5696), 666-669.
10. Price, D. J. D. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149, 510-515.
11. Shapira, P., Youtie, J., & Arora, S. (2012). Early patterns of commercial activity in graphene. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 14(4), art. num. 811.
12. Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2008). Detecting emerging research fronts based on topological measures in citation networks of scientific publications. Technovation, 28, 758-775.
13. Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., Sakata, I., & Matsushima, K. (2010). Detecting emerging research fronts in regenerative medicine by the citation network analysis of scientific publications. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 78(2), 274-282.
14. Small, H. (1977). A co-citation model of a scientific specialty: A longitudinal study of collagen research. Social Studies of Science, 7(139-166).
15. Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N. J. (2012). A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2378-2392.