Erratum: Copolymer composition deviations from mayo-lewis conventional free radical behavior in nitroxide mediated copolymerization (Macromolecular Theory and Simulations 2014, 23, (245-265)) DOI: 10.1002/mats.201300137;Copolymer composition deviations from mayo-lewis conventional free radical behavior in nitroxide mediated copolymerization

Macromolecular Theory and Simulations

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 245-265

  Zapata González, Iván ^a,b   Hutchinson, Robin A ^a   Matyjaszewski, Krzysztof ^d   Saldívar Guerra, Enrique ^a,b   Ortiz Cisneros, José ^c  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN QUÍMICA APLICADA   (Mexico)

^c UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE COAHUILA   (Mexico)

^d CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

controlled radical polymerization; copolymerization terminal model; mathematical modeling; nitroxide mediated polymerization

Indexed keywords

FREE RADICALS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

CONTROLLED RADICAL POLYMERIZATION; COPOLYMER COMPOSITIONS; FREE RADICAL COPOLYMERIZATION; NITROXIDE MEDIATED POLYMERIZATION; PARAMETER COMBINATION; QUASI-EQUILIBRIUM CONDITIONS; RADICAL COPOLYMERIZATION; TERMINAL MODEL;

COPOLYMERIZATION;

EID: 84899539645     PISSN: 10221344     EISSN: 15213919     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mats.201400110     Document Type: Erratum

References (56)

1. pp=percentage points. For an easier appreciation of their magnitudes, all the composition deviations are given in these units (differences of composition percentages).
2. D. H. Solomon, E. Rizzardo, P. Cacioli, (invs.) Chem. Abstr. 1985, 102, 2213 35q US 4,581,429 1986.
3. M. K. Georges, R. P. N. Veregin, P. M. Kazmaier, G. K. Hamer, (invs.) (Xerox Corporation), US Patent 5,322,912 (1994).
4. K. Matyjaszewski, J. Xia, Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 2921.
5. J. Chiefari, Y. K. Chong, F. Ercole, J. Krstina, J. Jeffery, T. P. T. Le, R. T. A. Mayadunne, G. F. Meijs, C. L. Moad, G. Moad, E. Rizzardo, S. H. Thang, Macromolecules 1998, 31, 5559.
6. S. Perrier, P. Takolpuckdee, J. Polym. Sci: A: Polym. Chem. 2005, 43, 5347.
7. P. Lacroix-Desmazes, A. M. Villa-Hernandez, D. Rayeroux, ACS Symp. Ser. 2012, 1100, 317.
8. M. Zhang, E. M. Carnahan, T. M. Karjala, P. Jain, Macromolecules 2009, 42, 8013.
9. A. Goto, T. Fukuda, Prog. Polym. Sci. 2004, 29, 329.
10. H. Fischer, J. Polym. Sci. A: Polym. Chem. 1999, 37, 1885.
11. D. Greszta, K. Matyjaszewski, Macromolecules 1996, 29, 7661.
12. W. Tang, K. Matyjaszewski, Macromol. Theory Simul. 2008, 17, 359.
13. M. A. Dubé, E. Saldívar-Guerra, I. Zapata-González, in: Handbook of Polymer Synthesis, Characterization, and Processing (Eds:, E. Saldívar-Guerra, E. Vivaldo-Lima,), John Wiley & Sons, NY 2013.
14. W. A. Braunecker, K. Matyjaszewski, Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007, 32, 93.
15. B. Klumperman, in: Polymer Science: A Comprehensive Reference (Eds: Editors-in-Chief:, K. Matyjaszewski, M. Möller,), Elsevier, Amsterdam 2012, pp. 433.
16. K. A. Davis, K. Matyjaszewski, Adv. Polym. Sci. 2002, 159, 1.
17. F. R. Mayo, F. M. Lewis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1944, 66, 1594.
18. K. Matyjaszewski, Macromolecules 1998, 31, 4710.
19. S. V. Arehart, K. Matyjaszewski, Macromolecules 1999, 32, 2221.
20. Y. Kotani, M. Kamigaito, M. Sawamoto, Macromolecules 1998, 31, 5582.
21. IUPAC recommends the use of the term reversible deactivation radical polymerization instead of other terms, but we use the term CRP in this paper due to its still widespread use.
22. J. P. A. Heuts, T. P. Davis, Macromol. Rapid Commun. 1998, 19, 371.
23. K. Matyjaszewski, Macromolecules 2002, 35, 6773.
24. B. Klumperman, G. Chambard, R. H. G. Brinkhuis, ACS Symp. Ser. 2003, 854, 180.
25. A. Felderman, A. A. Toy, H. Phan, M. H. Stenzel, T. D. Davies, C. Barner-Kowollik, Polymer 2004, 45, 3997.
26. Y. Shi, X. Qin, Y. Guo, M. Xie, Y. Zhang, Macromol. Theory Simul. 2008, 17, 130.
27. B. Charleux, J. Nicholas, O. Guerret, Macromolecules 2005, 38, 5485.
28. Generally, the hypothesis is valid for ten or more monomer units inserted in the polymer chain. In ordinary Markov processes the effect of the initiation becomes unimportant as the chain length increases and the polymer composition approaches its stationary limit.
29. M. L. Coote, T. P. Davis, in: Handbook of Radical Polymerization, 1st ed. (Eds:, K. Matyjaszewski, T. P. Davis,), Wiley Interscience, New York 2002, p. 269.
30. M. Farina, Makromol. Chem. 1990, 191, 2795.
31. E. Saldívar-Guerra, J. Bonilla, F. Becerril, G. Zacahua, M. Albores-Velasco, R. Alexander-Katz, L. Flores-Santos, L. Alexandrova, Macromol. Theory Simul. 2006, 15, 163.
32. Article to be submitted to Macromol. Theory Simul. 2014.
33. a) G. Moad, D. H. Solomon, The Chemistry of Radical Polymerization, Elsevier Ltd., Kiglington, Oxford, UK 2006, p. 337.
34. b) J. de la Fuente, M. Fernández-García, M. Fernández-Sanz, E. Lõpez-Madruga, Macromolecules 2001, 34, 5833.
35. c) M. J. Ziegler, K. Matyjaszewski, Macromolecules, 2001, 34, 415.
36. H. Kast, W. Funke, Makromol. Chem. 1981, 182, 1567.
37. D. I. Christie, R. G. Gilbert, J. P. Congalidis, J. R. Richards, J. H. McMinn, D. I. Christie, R. G. Gilbert, J. P. Congalidis, J. R. Richards, J. H. McMinn, Macromolecules 2001, 34, 5158.
38. M. Stickler, G. Meyerhoff, Makromol. Chem. 1978, 179, 2729.
39. Z. Zhang, X. Zhu, J. Zhu, Z. Cheng, S. Zhu, J. Polym. Sci. A: Polym. Chem. 2006, 44, 3343.
40. H. K. Hall, Jr., A. B. Padias, J. Polym. Sci. A: Polym. Chem. 2001, 39, 2069.
41. D. L. Hasha, D. B. Priddy, P. R. Rudolf, E. J. Stark, M. de Pooter, F. Van Damme, Macromolecules 1992, 25, 3046.
42. J. Bonilla-Cruz, L. Caballero, M. Albores-Velasco, E. Saldívar-Guerra, J. Percino, V. Chapela, Macromol. Symp. 2007, 248, 132.
43. J. D. Mota-Morales, I. Quintero-Ortega, E. Saldívar-Guerra, G. Luna-Bárcenas, M. Albores-Velasco, J. Percino, V. Chapela, M. A. Ocampo, Macromol. React. Eng. 2010, 4, 222.
44. A. W. Hui, A. E. Hamielec, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1972, 16, 749.
45. F. R. Mayo, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1953, 75, 6133.
46. It is expected and it was numerically confirmed that the QSSA for the radical types (Equation 9) is always valid starting from very early reaction times. The definition used for QSSA is a rigorous one based on the relative magnitude of derivatives of the intermediate fast dynamics species (free radicals) with respect to other "slow" species, and it amounts to the rapid cancellation of generation and consumption terms of the rate equations for the free radical species.
47. a) U. M. Ascher, L. R. Petzold, Computer Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations and Differential-Algebraic Equations, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia 1998, p. 59.
48. b) Linda. R. Petzold, A Description of DASSL, a Differential/Algebraic System Solver, Sandia Report SAND82-8637, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque New Mexico 1982.
49. D. Konkolewicz, S. Sosnowski, D. R. D'hooge, R. Szymanski, M. F. Reyniers, G. B. Marin, K. Matyjaszewski, Macromolecules 2011, 44, 8361.
50. In fact, in order to simplify the calculations, the FRP curves in columns b and c were calculated using the exact Mayo-Lewis model given in the Appendix.
51. T. Fukuda, T. Terauchi, A. Goto, K. Ohno, Y. Tsujii, T. Miyamoto, S. Kobatake, B. Yamada, Macromolecules 1996, 29, 6393.
52. L. Hlalele, B. Klumperman, Macromolecules 2011, 44, 6683.
53. L. Hlalele, B. Klumperman, in: Progress in Controlled Radical Polymerization: Mechanisms and Techniques, Vol. 1100 (Eds:, K. Matyjaszewski, B. S. Sumerlin, N. V. Tsarevsky,), ACS Symposium Series, Washington, DC 2012, p. 47.
54. W. Wang, R. A. Hutchinson, Macromol. Symp. 2010, 289, 33.
55. J. Nicolas, L. Mueller, C. Dire, K. Matyjaszewski, B. Charleux, Macromolecules 2009, 42, 4470.
56. C. Guerrero-Sánchez, E. Saldívar-Guerra, M. Hernández-Valdez, A. Jiménez, Polym. React. Eng. 2003, 11, 457.