Utilization of bioreactance technique as indicator for preload responsiveness during living donor liver donation

Transplantation Proceedings

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 669-671

  Lin, T W ^a   Luo, C F ^a   Lin, C C ^a,b,c   Lee, W C ^a,b   Su, B C ^a  

^a CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (Taiwan)

^c CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HETASTARCH;

ADULT; BIOREACTANCE TECHNIQUE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; FLUID INTAKE; FLUID RESTRICTION; HEART PRELOAD; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; LIVING DONOR LIVER DONATION; MALE; MONITOR; MONITORING; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; NONINVASIVE CARDIAC OUTPUT MONITOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ULTRASONIC CARDIAC OUTPUT MONITOR; FLUID THERAPY; HEMODYNAMICS; LIVER; LIVING DONOR; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; TRANSPLANTATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; LIVER; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; LIVING DONORS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84899536972     PISSN: 00411345     EISSN: 18732623     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.11.051     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. H. Chen, N.B. Merchant, and M.S. Didolkar Hepatic resection using intermittent vascular inflow occlusion and low central venous pressure anesthesia improves morbidity and mortality J Gastrointest Surg 4 2000 162 167
2. H.G. Ryu, F.S. Nahm, and H.M. Sohn et al. Low central venous pressure with milrinone during living donor hepatectomy Am J Transplant 10 2010 877 882
3. R.M. Jones, C.E. Moulton, and K.J. Hardy Central venous pressure and its effect on blood loss during liver resection Br J Surg 85 1998 1058 1060
4. P.E. Marik, M. Baram, and B. Vahid Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares Chest 134 2008 172 178
5. A. Kumar, R. Anel, and E. Bunnell et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects Crit Care Med 32 2004 691 699
6. D. Osman, C. Ridel, and P. Ray et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge Crit Care Med 35 2007 64 68
7. A.F. Connors Jr., T. Speroff, and N.V. Dawson et al. The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators JAMA 276 1996 889 897
8. P.E. Marik, R. Cavallazzi, and T. Vasu et al. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature Crit Care Med 37 2009 2642 2647
9. P.E. Marik Noninvasive cardiac output monitors: a state-of the-art review J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 27 2013 121 134
10. B. Benomar, A. Ouattara, and P. Estagnasie et al. Fluid responsiveness predicted by noninvasive bioreactance-based passive leg raise test Intensive Care Med 36 2010 1875 1881
11. P.E. Marik, A. Levitov, and A. Young et al. The use of bioreactance and carotid doppler to determine volume responsiveness and blood flow redistribution following passive leg raising in hemodynamically unstable patients Chest 143 2013 364 370
12. I. Dey, and P. Sprivulis Emergency physicians can reliably assess emergency department patient cardiac output using the USCOM continuous wave Doppler cardiac output monitor Emerg Med Australas 17 2005 193 199
13. B.C. Su, C.C. Lin, and C.W. Su et al. Ultrasonic cardiac output monitor provides accurate measurement of cardiac output in recipients after liver transplantation Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan 46 2008 171 177
14. B.C. Su, H.P. Yu, and M.W. Yang et al. Reliability of a new ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in recipients of living donor liver transplantation Liver Transpl 14 2008 1029 1037
15. B.C. Su, Y.F. Tsai, and C.W. Cheng et al. Stroke volume variation derived by arterial pulse contour analysis is a good indicator for preload estimation during liver transplantation Transplant Proc 44 2012 429 432
16. J.Y. Yin, and K.M. Ho Use of plethysmographic variability index derived from the Massimo((R)) pulse oximeter to predict fluid or preload responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis Anaesthesia 67 2012 777 783
17. B. Lansdorp, J. Lemson, and M.J. van Putten et al. Dynamic indices do not predict volume responsiveness in routine clinical practice Br J Anaesth 108 2012 395 401
18. X. Monnet, L. Guerin, and M. Jozwiak et al. Pleth variability index is a weak predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients receiving norepinephrine Br J Anaesth 110 2013 207 213
19. S.W. Chong, and P.J. Peyton A meta-analysis of the accuracy and precision of the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) Anaesthesia 67 2012 1266 1271
20. J.L. Vincent, A. Rhodes, and A. Perel et al. Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring-a consensus of 16 Crit Care 15 2011 229
21. E. Kupersztych-Hagege, J.L. Teboul, and A. Artigas et al. Bioreactance is not reliable for estimating cardiac output and the effects of passive leg raising in critically ill patients Br J Anaesth 111 2013 961 966