Effect of motor imagery in children with unilateral cerebral palsy: fMRI study

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2014, Pages

  Chinier, Eva ^a,b   N'Guyen, Sylvie ^a   Lignon, Grégoire ^a   Minassian, Aram Ter ^a   Richard, Isabelle ^b   Dinomais, Mickaël ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ D'ANGERS   (France)

^b Centre DeMédecine Physique et de Réadaptation   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN DAMAGE; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN REGION; CEREBRAL PALSY; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HAND MOVEMENT; HEMIPLEGIA; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; IMAGERY; IMAGINATION; MALE; MOTOR IMAGERY; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PRESCHOOL CHILD; SCHOOL CHILD; TASK PERFORMANCE; ADOLESCENT; BRAIN; DEMOGRAPHY; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL PALSY; CHILD; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGERY (PSYCHOTHERAPY); MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84899508754     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093378     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Houwink A, Aarts PBM, Geurts ACH, Steenbergen B (2011). A neurocognitive perspective on developmental disregard in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil. 32: 2157-63.
2. Steenbergen B, Gordon AM (2006). Activity limitation in hemiplegic cerebral palsy: evidence for disorders in motor planning. Dev Med Child Neurol. 48: 780-3. (Pubitemid 44227173)
3. Crajé C, Aarts P, Nijhuis-van der Sanden M, Steenbergen B (2010). Action planning in typically and atypically developing children (unilateral cerebral palsy). Res Dev Disabil. 31: 1039-46.
4. Wolpert DM, Miall RC (1996). Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control. Neural Networks Off J Int Neural Netw Soc. 9: 1265-79. (Pubitemid 26413051)
5. Johnson SH, Sprehn G, Saykin AJ (2002). Intact motor imagery in chronic upper limb hemiplegics: evidence for activity-independent action representations. J Cogn Neurosci. 14: 841-52.
6. Johnston MV (2009). Plasticity in the developing brain: implications for rehabilitation. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 15: 94-101.
7. Sakzewski L, Ziviani J, Boyd R (2009). Systematic review and meta-analysis of therapeutic management of upper-limb dysfunction in children with congenital hemiplegia. Pediatrics. 123: e1111-1122.
8. Steenbergen B, Crajé C, Nilsen DM, Gordon AM (2009). Motor imagery training in hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a potentially useful therapeutic tool for rehabilitation. Dev Med Child Neurol. 51: 690-6.
9. Decety Grèzes (1999). Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends Cogn Sci. 3: 172-8.
10. Decety J (1996). The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery. Behav Brain Res. 77: 45-52.
11. Jeannerod M, Decety J (1995). Mental motor imagery: a window into the representational stages of action. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 5: 727-32. (Pubitemid 26042621)
12. Grèzes J, Decety J (2001). Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 12: 1-19. (Pubitemid 32048353)
13. Sabaté M, González B, Rodríguez M (2004). Brain lateralization of motor imagery: motor planning asymmetry as a cause of movement lateralization. Neuropsychologia. 42: 1041-9.
14. Williams J, Reid SM, Reddihough DS, Anderson V (2011). Motor imagery ability in children with congenital hemiplegia: effect of lesion side and functional level. Res Dev Disabil. 32: 740-8.
15. Staudt M, Grodd W, Gerloff C, Erb M, Stitz J, Krägeloh-Mann I (2002). Two types of ipsilateral reorganization in congenital hemiparesis: a TMS and fMRI study. Brain J Neurol. 125: 2222-37.
16. Dinomais M, Lignon G, Chinier E, Richard I, Ter Minassian A, Tich SNT (2013). Effect of observation of simple hand movement on brain activations in patients with unilateral cerebral palsy: an fMRI study. Res Dev Disabil. 34: 1928-37.
17. Dinomais M, Chinier E, Lignon G, Richard I, Ter Minassian A, Tich NT (2013). The effect of video-guidance on passive movement in patients with cerebral palsy: fMRI study. Res Dev Disabil. 34: 3487-96.
18. Beckung E, Hagberg G (2002). Neuroimpairments, activity limitations, and participation restrictions in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 44: 309-16. (Pubitemid 34516395)
19. Staudt M, Gerloff C, Grodd W, Holthausen H, Niemann G, Krägeloh-Mann I. (2004) Reorganization in congenital hemiparesis acquired at different gestational ages. Ann Neurol. 56: 854-63. (Pubitemid 39578449)
20. Sharma N, Baron J-C (2013). Does motor imagery share neural networks with executed movement: a multivariate fMRI analysis. Front Hum Neurosci. 7: 564.
21. Mercier C, Aballea A, Vargas CD, Paillard J, Sirigu A (2008). Vision without proprioception modulates cortico-spinal excitability during hand motor imagery. Cereb Cortex 18: 272-7. (Pubitemid 351197785)
22. Andersson JL, Hutton C, Ashburner J, Turner R, Friston K (2001). Modeling geometric deformations in EPI time series. Neuroimage. 13: 903-19. (Pubitemid 32848335)
23. Ashburner J, Friston KJ (2005). Unified segmentation. Neuroimage. 26: 839-51. (Pubitemid 40825026)
24. Seghier ML, Ramlackhansingh A, Crinion J, Leff AP, Price CJ (2008). Lesion identification using unified segmentation-normalisation models and fuzzy clustering. Neuroimage. 41: 1253-66.
25. Brett M, Leff AP, Rorden C, Ashburner J (2001). Spatial normalization of brain images with focal lesions using cost function masking. Neuroimage. 14: 486-500. (Pubitemid 32709562)
26. Eickhoff SB, Stephan KE, Mohlberg H, Grefkes C, Fink GR, Amunts K, et al (2005). A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. Neuroimage. 25(4): 1325-35. (Pubitemid 40591672)
27. Hétu S, Grégoire M, Saimpont A, Coll M-P, Eugène F, Michon P-E, et al (2013). The neural network of motor imagery: An ALE meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 37: 930-49.
28. Yan J, Guo X, Jin Z, Sun J, Shen L, Tong S (2012). Cognitive alterations in motor imagery process after left hemispheric ischemic stroke. 7: e42922.
29. Sirigu A, Duhamel JR, Cohen L, Pillon B, Dubois B, Agid Y (1996). The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage. Science. 273: 1564-8.
30. Johnson SH, Rotte M, Grafton ST, Hinrichs H, Gazzaniga MS, Heinze HJ (2002). Selective activation of a parietofrontal circuit during implicitly imagined prehension. Neuroimage. 17: 1693-704. (Pubitemid 36062760)
31. Sirigu A, Cohen L, Duhamel JR, Pillon B, Dubois B, Agid Y, et al (1995). Congruent unilateral impairments for real and imagined hand movements. Neuroreport. 6: 997-1001.
32. Janssen L, Steenbergen B (2011). Typical and atypical (cerebral palsy) development of unimanual and bimanual grasp planning. Res Dev Disabil. 32: 963-71.
33. Mutsaarts M, Steenbergen B, Bekkering H (2006). Anticipatory planning deficits and task context effects in hemiparetic cerebral palsy. Exp Brain Res Exp Hirnforsch Expérimentation Cérébrale. 172: 151-62. (Pubitemid 43854234)
34. Steenbergen B, Gordon AM (2006). Activity limitation in hemiplegic cerebral palsy: evidence for disorders in motor planning. Dev Med Child Neurol. 48: 780-3. (Pubitemid 44227173)
35. Steenbergen B, Verrel J, Gordon AM (2007). Motor planning in congenital hemiplegia. Disabil Rehabil. 29: 13-23. (Pubitemid 47161204)
36. Crajé C, van der Kamp J, Steenbergen B (2009). Visual information for action planning in left and right congenital hemiparesis. Brain Res. 1261: 54-64.
37. Steenbergen B, Meulenbroek RGJ, Rosenbaum DA (2004). Constraints on grip selection in hemiparetic cerebral palsy: effects of lesional side, end-point accuracy, and context. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 19: 145-59. (Pubitemid 38328748)
38. Johnson-Frey SH, Newman-Norlund R, Grafton ST (2005). A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills. Cereb Cortex 15: 681-95. (Pubitemid 40703968)
39. Van Elk M, Crajé C, Beeren MEGV, Steenbergen B, van Schie HT, Bekkering H (2010). Neural evidence for impaired action selection in right hemiparetic cerebral palsy. Brain Res. 1349: 56-67.
40. Schluter ND, Krams M, Rushworth MF, Passingham RE (2001). Cerebral dominance for action in the human brain: the selection of actions. Neuropsychologia. 39: 105-13. (Pubitemid 32036992)
41. Haaland KY, Harrington DL, Knight RT (2000). Neural representations of skilled movement. Brain J Neurol. 123: 2306-13.
42. Mutsaarts M, Steenbergen B, Bekkering H (2007). Impaired motor imagery in right hemiparetic cerebral palsy. Neuropsychologia. 45: 853-9. (Pubitemid 44958761)
43. Steenbergen B, van Nimwegen M, Crajé C (2007). Solving a mental rotation task in congenital hemiparesis: motor imagery versus visual imagery. Neuropsychologia. 45: 3324-8. (Pubitemid 47503204)
44. Stinear CM, Fleming MK, Barber PA, Byblow WD (2007). Lateralization of motor imagery following stroke. Clin Neurophysiol Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol. 118: 1794-801. (Pubitemid 47031708)
45. Heil M, Rösler F, Hennighausen E (1993). Imagery-perception interaction depends on the shape of the image: a reply to Farah (1989). J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 19: 1313-20.
46. Culham JC, Kanwisher NG (2001). Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 11: 157-63. (Pubitemid 32289401)
47. Harris IM, Miniussi C (2003). Parietal lobe contribution to mental rotation demonstrated with rTMS. J Cogn Neurosci. 15: 315-23. (Pubitemid 36438943)
48. Lebon F, Lotze M, Stinear CM, Byblow WD (2012). Task-dependent interaction between parietal and contralateral primary motor cortex during explicit versus implicit motor imagery. PloS One. 7: e37850.
49. Sharma N, Pomeroy VM, Baron J-C (2006). Motor imagery: a backdoor to the motor system after stroke? Stroke J Cereb Circ. 37: 1941-52. (Pubitemid 44297755)
50. Jackson PL, Lafleur MF, Malouin F, Richards C, Doyon J (2001). Potential role of mental practice using motor imagery in neurologic rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 82: 1133-41. (Pubitemid 32744342)
51. Holmes P, Calmels C (2008). A neuroscientific review of imagery and observation use in sport. J Mot Behav. 40: 433-45.
52. Saito K, Yamaguchi T, Yoshida N, Tanabe S, Kondo K, Sugawara K (2013). Combined effect of motor imagery and peripheral nerve electrical stimulation on the motor cortex. Exp Brain Res Exp Hirnforsch Expérimentation Cérébrale. 227: 333-42.
53. Zimmermann-Schlatter A, Schuster C, Puhan MA, Siekierka E, Steurer J (2008). Efficacy of motor imagery in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. J Neuroengineering Rehabil. 5: 8.
54. Maruff P, Wilson P, Trebilcock M, Currie J (1999). Abnormalities of imaged motor sequences in children with developmental coordination disorder. Neuropsychologia. 37: 1317-24. (Pubitemid 29421827)
55. Solodkin A, Hlustik P, Chen EE, Small SL (2004). Fine modulation in network activation during motor execution and motor imagery. Cereb Cortex14: 1246-55. (Pubitemid 39391202)