Typical and atypical (cerebral palsy) development of unimanual and bimanual grasp planning

Research in Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 963-971

  Janssen, Loes ^a,b   Steenbergen, Bert ^a,b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bimanual; Cerebral palsy; Development; Motor planning

Indexed keywords

AGE; ANTICIPATION; ARTICLE; CEREBRAL PALSY; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HAND GRIP; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; SCHOOL CHILD;

CEREBRAL PALSY; CHILD; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; PSYCHOMOTOR DISORDERS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 79952449864     PISSN: 08914222     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aarts P.B., Jongerius P.H., Geerdink Y.A., van Limbeek J., Geurts A.C. Modified constraint-induced movement therapy combined with bimanual training (mCIMT-BiT) in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy: How are improvements in arm-hand use established?. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2011, 32(1):271-279.
2. Adalbjornsson C.F., Fischman M.G., Rudisill M.E. The end-state comfort effect in young children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2008, 79(1):36-41.
3. Bax M., Goldstein M., Rosenbaum P., Leviton A., Paneth N. Proposed definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2005-Introduction. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 2005, 47(8):571-576.
4. Blair E., Watson L. Epidemiology of cerebral palsy. Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2006, 11(2):117-125.
5. Braun S.M., Beurskens A.J., Borm P.J., Schack T., Wade D.T. The effects of mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2006, 87(6):842-852.
6. Casey B.J., Tottenham N., Liston C., Durston S. Imaging the developing bra what have we learned about cognitive development?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9(3):104-110.
7. Claxton L.J., Keen R., McCarty M.E. Evidence of motor planning in infant reaching behavior. Psychological Science 2003, 14(4):354-356.
8. Claxton L.J., McCarty M.E., Keen R. Self-directed action affects planning in tool-use tasks with toddlers. Infant Behavior & Development 2009, 32(2):230-233.
9. Cohen R.G., Rosenbaum D.A. Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: Generation and recall of motor plans. Experimental Brain Research 2004, 157(4):486-495.
10. Crajé C., Aarts P., Nijhuis-van der Sanden M., Steenbergen B. Action planning in typically and atypically developing children (unilateral cerebral palsy). Research in Developmental Disabilities 2010, 31(5):1039-1046.
11. Crajé C., van Elk M., Beeren M., van Schie H.T., Bekkering H., Steenbergen B. Compromised motor planning and motor imagery in right hemiparetic cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2010, 31(6):1313-1322.
12. Gentilucci M., Negrotti A., Gangitano M. Planning an action. Experimental Brain Research 1997, 115(1):116-128.
13. Gordon A.M., Schneider J.A., Chinnan A., Charles J.R. Efficacy of a hand-arm bimanual intensive therapy (HABIT) in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: A randomized control trial. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 2007, 49(11):830-838.
14. Gordon A.M., Steenbergen B. Bimanual coordination in children with cerebral palsy. Improving hand function in children with cerebral palsy: Theory, evidence and intervention 2008, 160-175. MacKeith Press, London. A.C. Eliasson, P. Beurtner (Eds.).
15. Hughes C.M.L., Franz E.A. Goal-related planning constraints in bimanual grasping and placing of objects. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 188:541-550.
16. Hung Y.C., Charles J., Gordon A.M. Influence of accuracy constraints on bimanual coordination during a goal-directed task in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 201(3):421-428.
17. Janssen L., Beuting M., Meulenbroek R.G.J., Steenbergen B. Combined effects of planning and execution constraints on bimanual task performance. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 192:61-73.
18. Janssen L., Crajé C., Weigelt M., Steenbergen B. Motor planning in bimanual object manipulation: Two plans for two hands?. Motor Control 2010, 14(2):240-254.
19. Johnson-Frey S.H., McCarty M.E., Keen R. Reaching beyond spatial perception: Effects of intended future actions on visually guided prehension. Visual Cognition 2004, 11(2-3):371-399.
20. Manoel E.J., Moreira C.R.P. Planning manipulative hand movements: Do young children show the end-state comfort effect?. Journal of Human Movement Studies 2005, 49(2):93-114.
21. Marteniuk R.G., Mackenzie C.L., Jeannerod M., Athenes S., Dugas C. Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. Canadian Journal of Psychology-Revue Canadienne De Psychologie 1987, 41(3):365-378.
22. Maruff P., Wilson P., Trebilcock M., Currie J. Abnormalities of imagined motor sequences in children with developmental coordination disorder. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37(11):1317-1324.
23. Mathiowetz V., Volland G., Kashman N., Weber K. Adult norms for the box and block test of manual dexterity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1985, 39(6):386-391.
24. McCarty M.E., Clifton R.K., Collard R.R. Problem solving in infancy: The emergence of an action plan. Developmental Psychology 1999, 35(4):1091-1101.
25. Miall R.C., Wolpert D.M. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Networks 1996, 9(8):1265-1279.
26. Mutsaarts M., Steenbergen B., Bekkering H. Anticipatory planning deficits and task context effects in hemiparetic cerebral palsy. Experimental Brain Research 2006, 172(2):151-162.
27. Mutsaarts M., Steenbergen B., Bekkering H. Impaired motor imagery in right hemiparetic cerebral palsy. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45(4):853-859.
28. Rosenbaum D.A., Halloran E.S., Cohen R.G. Grasping movement plans. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13(5):918-922.
29. Rosenbaum D.A., Marchak F., Barnes H.J., Vaughan J., Slotta J., Jorgensen M.J. Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips. Attention and Performance XIII 1990, 321-342. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. M. Jeannerod (Ed.).
30. Rosenbaum D.A., vanHeugten C.M., Caldwell G.E. From cognition to biomechanics and back: The end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect. Acta Psychologica 1996, 94(1):59-85.
31. Sharma N., Pomeroy V.M., Baron J.C. Motor imagery-A backdoor to the motor system after stroke?. Stroke 2006, 37(7):1941-1952.
32. Short M.W., Cauraugh J.H. Precision hypothesis and the end-state comfort effect. Acta Psychologica 1999, 100(3):243-252.
33. Steenbergen B., Charles J., Gordon A.M. Fingertip force control during bimanual object lifting in hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 186(2):191-201.
34. Steenbergen B., Crajé C., Nilsen D.M., Gordon A.M. Motor imagery training in hemiplegic cerebral palsy: A potentially useful therapeutic tool for rehabilitation. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 2009, 51(9):690-696.
35. Steenbergen B., Gordon A.M. Activity limitation in hemiplegic cerebral palsy: Evidence for disorders in motor planning. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 2006, 48(9):780-783.
36. Steenbergen B., Hulstijn W., deVries A., Berger M. Bimanual movement coordination in spastic hemiparesis. Experimental Brain Research 1996, 110(1):91-98.
37. Steenbergen B., Hulstijn W., Dortmans S. Constraints on grip selection in cerebral palsy-Minimising discomfort. Experimental Brain Research 2000, 134(3):385-397.
38. Steenbergen B., Marteniuk R.G., Kalbfleisch L.E. Achieving coordination in prehension: Joint freezing and postural contributions. Journal of Motor Behavior 1995, 27(4):333-348.
39. Steenbergen B., van Nimwegen M., Crajé C. Solving a mental rotation task in congenital hemiparesis: Motor imagery versus visual imagery. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45(14):3324-3328.
40. Sugden D., Utley A. Interlimb coupling in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 1995, 37(4):293-309.
41. Thibaut J.P., Toussaint L. Developing motor planning over ages. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2010, 105(1-2):116-129.
42. Tiffin J. Purdue Pegboard examiner manual 1968, Science Research Associates, Chicago.
43. Utley A., Sugden D. Interlimb coupling in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy during reaching and grasping at speed. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 1998, 40(6):396-404.
44. van der Wel R.P., Rosenbaum D.A. Bimanual grasp planning reflects changing rather than fixed constraint dominance. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 205(3):351-362.
45. Volman M.J.M., Wijnroks A., Vermeer A. Bimanual circle drawing in children with spastic hemiparesis: Effect of coupling modes on the performance of the impaired and unimpaired arms. Acta Psychologica 2002, 110(2-3):339-356.
46. Weigelt M., Kunde W., Prinz W. End-state comfort in bimanual object manipulation. Experimental Psychology 2006, 53(2):143-148.
47. Weigelt M., Schack T. The development of end-state comfort planning in preschool children. Experimental Psychology 2010.
48. Williams J., Reid S.M., Reddihough D.S., Anderson V. Motor imagery ability in children with congenital hemiplegia: Effect of lesion side and functional level. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2010.
49. Wilson P.H., Maruff P., Butson M., Williams J., Lum J., Thomas P.R. Internal representation of movement in children with developmental coordination disorder: A mental rotation task. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 2004, 46(11):754-759.
50. Wilson P.H., Thomas P.R., Maruff P. Motor imagery training ameliorates motor clumsiness in children. Journal of Child Neurology 2002, 17(7):491-498.
51. Wolpert D.M. Computational approaches to motor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1997, 1(6):209-216.