Quantitative metabolomics: A phantom?

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 238-244

  Noack, Stephan ^a   Wiechert, Wolfgang ^a  

^a FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Intracellular metabolites; Mass spectrometry; Metabolomics; Quantification

Indexed keywords

EXPERIMENTS; MASS SPECTROMETRY;

BIOLOGICAL EXPERIMENTS; INTRACELLULAR METABOLITES; MEASUREMENT PRECISION; MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES; METABOLOMICS; QUANTIFICATION; REPRODUCIBILITIES; SPECTROMETRIC MEASUREMENTS;

MASS SPECTROMETERS;

MASS SPECTROMETRY; METABOLOMICS; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METABOLOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84899484564     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.03.006     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Wiechert W., Noack S. Mechanistic pathway modeling for industrial biotechnology: challenging but worthwhile. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2011, 22:604-610.
2. Harrison S., Herrgård M. The uses and future prospects of metabolomics and targeted metabolite profiling in cell factory development. Ind. Biotechnol. 2013, 9:196-202.
3. Ellis D.I., Goodacre R. Metabolomics-assisted synthetic biology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2012, 23:22-28.
4. Bevington P., Robinson D. Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences 2002, McGraw Hill.
5. Monod J. The growth of bacterial cultures. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1949, 3:371-394.
6. Díaz M., et al. Application of flow cytometry to industrial microbial bioprocesses. Biochem. Eng. J. 2010, 48:385-407.
7. Harris C.M., et al. Dielectric permittivity of microbial suspensions at radio frequencies: a novel method for the real-time estimation of microbial biomass. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1987, 9:181-186.
8. Bryan A.K., et al. Continuous and long-term volume measurements with a commercial Coulter counter. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e29866.
9. Lidstrom M.E., Konopka M.C. The role of physiological heterogeneity in microbial population behavior. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2010, 6:705-712.
10. Müller S., et al. Origin and analysis of microbial population heterogeneity in bioprocesses. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2010, 21:100-113.
11. Rubakhin S.S., et al. Progress toward single cell metabolomics. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2013, 24:95-104.
12. Volkmer B., Heinemann M. Condition-dependent cell volume and concentration of Escherichia coli to facilitate data conversion for systems biology modeling. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e23126.
13. Meinert S., et al. Quantitative quenching evaluation and direct intracellular metabolite analysis in Penicillium chrysogenum. Anal. Biochem. 2013, 438:47-52.
14. De Mey M., et al. Catching prompt metabolite dynamics in Escherichia coli with the BioScope at oxygen rich conditions. Metab. Eng. 2010, 12:477-487.
15. Canelas A.B., et al. Leakage-free rapid quenching technique for yeast metabolomics. Metabolomics 2008, 4:226-239.
16. Wellerdiek M., et al. Metabolic quenching of Corynebacterium glutamicum: efficiency of methods and impact of cold shock. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2009, 32:581-592.
17. Van Gulik W.M., et al. Fast sampling of the cellular metabolome. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 881:279-306.
18. Link H., et al. Leakage of adenylates during cold methanol/glycerol quenching of Escherichia coli. Metabolomics 2008, 4:240-247.
19. Schädel F., et al. Evaluation of cell damage caused by cold sampling and quenching for metabolome analysis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 92:1261-1274.
20. Tillack J., et al. Error propagation analysis for quantitative intracellular metabolomics. Metabolites 2012, 2:1012-1030.
21. Paczia N., et al. Extensive exometabolome analysis reveals extended overflow metabolism in various microorganisms. Microb. Cell Fact. 2012, 11:122.
22. Taymaz-Nikerel H., et al. Development and application of a differential method for reliable metabolome analysis in Escherichia coli. Anal. Biochem. 2009, 386:9-19.
23. Douma R.D., et al. Intracellular metabolite determination in the presence of extracellular abundance: Application to the penicillin biosynthesis pathway in Penicillium chrysogenum. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010, 107:105-115.
24. Bi H., et al. Optimization of harvesting, extraction, and analytical protocols for UPLC-ESI-MS-based metabolomic analysis of adherent mammalian cancer cells. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2013, 405:5279-5289.
25. Canelas A.B., et al. Quantitative evaluation of intracellular metabolite extraction techniques for yeast metabolomics. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81:7379-7389.
26. Duportet X., et al. The biological interpretation of metabolomic data can be misled by the extraction method used. Metabolomics 2012, 8:410-421.
27. Putri S.P., et al. Current metabolomics: technological advances. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2013, 116:9-16.
28. Jessome L.L., Volmer D.A. Ion suppression: a major concern in mass spectrometry. LCGC 2006, 24.
29. Seifar R.M., et al. Quantitative analysis of intracellular coenzymes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using ion pair reversed phase ultra high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1311:115-120.
30. Büscher J.M., et al. Cross-platform comparison of methods for quantitative metabolomics of primary metabolism. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81:2135-2143.
31. Chalcraft K.R., McCarry B.E. Tandem LC columns for the simultaneous retention of polar and nonpolar molecules in comprehensive metabolomics analysis. J. Sep. Sci. 2013, 36:3478-3485.
32. Hsu C.C., et al. Real-time metabolomics on living microorganisms using ambient electrospray ionization flow-probe. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85:7014-7018.
33. Wei X., et al. Data preprocessing method for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry based metabolomics. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84:7963-7971.
34. Forcisi S., et al. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in metabolomics research: mass analyzers in ultra high pressure liquid chromatography coupling. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1292:51-65.
35. Moseley H.N. Error analysis and propagation in metabolomics data analysis. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2013, 4:e201301006.
36. Shahaf N., et al. Constructing a mass measurement error surface to improve automatic annotations in liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry based metabolomics. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2013, 27:2425-2431.
37. Sumner L.W., et al. Proposed minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis Chemical Analysis Working Group (CAWG) Metabolomics Standards Initiative (MSI). Metabolomics 2007, 3:211-221.
38. Zamboni N., et al. (13)C-based metabolic flux analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4:878-892.
39. Wiechert W., Nöh K. Isotopically non-stationary metabolic flux analysis: complex yet highly informative. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2013, 24:979-986.
40. Picotti P., et al. Proteomics meets the scientific method. Nat. Methods 2013, 10:24-27.