Engineering copolymeric artificial cornea with salt porogen

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 102, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1799-1808

  Zellander, Amelia ^a   Wardlow, Melissa ^a   Djalilian, Ali ^b   Zhao, Chenlin ^c   Abiade, Jeremiah ^c   Cho, Michael ^a  

^a University of Illinois at Chicago   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^c University of Illinois at Chicago   (United States)

Author keywords

artificial cornea; kerato prosthesis; poly(2 hydroxyethyl methacrylate); poly(methyl methacrylate); skirt core model

Indexed keywords

CELL CULTURE; COPOLYMERS; ESTERS; PHEMA; SODIUM CHLORIDE; TISSUE;

ARTIFICIAL CORNEA; KERATO-PROSTHESIS; MECHANICALLY STABLE; POLY(2-HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE); POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE) (PMMA); SODIUM CHLORIDE (NACL); TISSUE IN-GROWTH; VISIBLE-WAVELENGTH RANGE;

ARTIFICIAL ORGANS;

POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); POLYMACON; POROUS POLYMER; SODIUM CHLORIDE; BIOMATERIAL;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL ORGAN; CELL GROWTH; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; FIBROBLAST; HOST; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMPLANTATION; MELTING POINT; POLYMERIZATION; SPECTRAL SENSITIVITY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TISSUE ENGINEERING; BIOARTIFICIAL ORGAN; CELL CULTURE; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; POROSITY; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

BIOARTIFICIAL ORGANS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELLS, CULTURED; CORNEA; FIBROBLASTS; HUMANS; POLYHYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; POROSITY; SODIUM CHLORIDE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84899453322     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34852     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Gomaa A, Comyn O, Liu C,. Keratoprostheses in clinical practice-A review. Clin Experimental Ophthalmol 2010; 38: 211-224.
2. Griffith M, Fagerholm P, Liu W, McLaughlin CR, Li F,. Essentials in Ophthalmology: Cornea and External Eye Disease. Springer, New York; 2005. p 37-53.
3. Jun JJ, Siracuse-Lee DE, Daly MK, Dohlman CH,. Chapter 10: Keratoprosthesis. In:, Krieglstein GK, Weinreb RN, editors. Cornea and External Eye Disease: Essentials in Ophthalmology. Springer, Berlin; 2012. p 137-144.
4. Sheardown H, Griffith M,. Regenerative medicine in the cornea. In: Principles of Regenerative Medicine. Elsevier, Amsterdam; 2008. p 1060-1071.
5. Dalton PD, Flynn L, Shoichet MS,. Manufacture of poly(2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate-co-Methyl Methacrylate) hydrogel tubes for use as nerve guidance channels. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 3843-3851.
6. Yukna RA, Castellon P, Saenz-Nasr AM, Owens K, Simmons J, Thunthy KH, Mayer ET,. Evaluation of hard tissue replacement composite graft material as a ridge preservation/augmentation material in conjunction with immediate hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. J Periodontol 2003; 74: 679-686.
7. Schild G, Schauersberger J, Amon M, Abela-Formanek C, Kruger A,. Lens epithelial cell ongrowth: Comparison of 6 types of hydrophilic intraocular lens models. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 2375-2378.
8. Mullner-Eidenbock A, Amon M, Schauersberger J, Kruger A, Abela C, Petternel V, Zidek T,. Cellular reaction on the anterior surface of 4 types of intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27: 734-740.
9. Lloyd AW, Faragher RG, Denyer SP,. Ocular biomaterials and implants. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 769-85.
10. Guo P, Chen JQ, Tan BH, Wang ZC, Liu ZG, Yuan J, Gu JJ, Huang H,. Implantation of Modified polyhydroxyethyl methacrylate-polymethyl methacrylate keratoprostheses in rabbit and monkey corneas. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 2007; 43: 602-607.
11. Espana EM, Acosta AC, Stoiber J, Fernandez V, Lamar PD, Villain FL, Lacombe E, Alfonso E, Parel JM,. Long-term follow-up of a supradescemetic keratoprosthesis in rabbits: An immunofluorescence study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011; 249: 253-260.
12. Hicks CR, Werner L, Vijayasekaran S, Mamalis N, Apple DJ,. Histology of AlphaCor Skirts Evaluation ofBiointegration. Cornea 2005; 24: 933-940.
13. Vijayasekaran S, Fitton JH, Hicks CR, Chirila TV, Crawford GJ, Constable IJ,. Cell viability and inflammatory response in hydrogel sponges implanted in the rabbit cornea. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 2255-2267.
14. Todani A, Ciolino JB, Ament JD, Colby KA, Pineda R, Belin MW, Aquavella JV, Chodosh J, Dohlman CH,. Titanium back plate for a PMMA keratoprosthesis: Clinical outcomes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011; 249: 1515-1518.
15. Hicks C, Crawford G, Chirila T, Wiffen S, Vijayasekaran S, Lou X, Fitton J, Maley M, Clayton A, Dalton P, Platten S, Ziegelaar B, Hong Y, Russo A, Constable I,. Development and clinical assessment of an artificial cornea. Prog Retin Eye Res 2000; 19: 149-170.
16. Pintucci S, Pintucci F, Cecconi M, Caiazza S,. New Dacron Tissue colonisable keratoprosthesis: Clinical experience. Br J Ophthalmol 1995; 79: 825-829.
17. Kim MK, Lee SM, Lee JL, Chung TY, Kim YH, Wee WR, Lee JH,. Long-term outcome in ocular intractable surface disease with seoul-type keratoprosthesis. Cornea 2007; 26: 546-551.
18. Hicks CR, Crawford GJ, Dart JKG, Grabner G, Holland EJ, Stulting RD, Tan DT, Bulsara M,. AlphaCor clinical outcomes. Cornea 2006; 25: 1034-1042.
19. Lee W, Lee TG, Koh WG,. Grafting of Poly(acrylic acid) on the poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel using surface-initiated photopolymerization for covalent immobilization of collagen. J Ind Eng Chem 2007; 13: 1195-1200.
20. De Clerck N, Postnov A,. Chapter 2: High resolution microtomography: Applications in biomedical research. In:, Ntziachristos V, Leroy-Willig A, Tavitian B, editors. Textbook of In Vivo Imaging in Vertibrates. Wiley, West Sussex; 2007.
21. Torris AT, Columbus KC, Saaj US, Nair MB, Krishnan KV,. Evaluation of biomaterials using micro-computerized tomography. In:, Munshi P, editor. Tomography confluence: An International Conference on the Applications of Computerized Tomography. American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY; 2008. p 68-8.
22. Peyrin F, Mastrogiacomo M, Cancedda R, Martinetti R,. SEM and 3D synchrotron radiation micro-tomography in the study of bioceramic scaffolds for tissue-engineering applications. Biotechnol Bioeng 2007; 97: 638-648.
23. Myung D, Farooqui N, Waters D, Schaber S, Koh W, Carrasco M, Noolandi J, Frank CW, Ta CN,. Glucose-permeable interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels for corneal implant applications: A pilot study. Curr Eye Res 2008; 33: 29-43.
24. Wisniewski S, Kim SW,. Permeation of water-soluble solutes through poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) and poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) crosslinked with ethylene glycol dimethacrylate. J Memb Sci 1980; 6: 299-308.
25. He W, Benson R,. Applied Plastics Engineering Handbook. Elsevier, Boston; 2011. p 159-175.
26. Lou X, Dalton PD, Chirila TV,. Hydrophilic sponges based on 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate part VII: Modulation of sponge characteristics by changes in reactivity and hydrophilicity of crosslinking agents. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2000; 11: 319-325.
27. Dziubla TD, Lowman AM,. Vascularization of PEG-grafted macroporous hydrogel sponges: A three-dimensional in vitro angiogenesis model using human microvascular endothelial cells. J Biomed Mater Res 2004; 68A: 603-614.
28. Wang J, Chauhan A,. Disruption of tear film and blink dynamics. In: Ocular Disease Mechanisms and Management. Elsevier, Philadelphia; 2010. p 123-130.
29. M. R, Zierhut M,. The ocular surface and tear film and their dysfunction in dry eye disease. Surv Ophthalmol 2001; 45 (Suppl 2): S203-S210.
30. Shiose Y,. Intraocular pressure: New perspectives. Surv Ophthalmol 1990; 34: 413-435.
31. Bhan A, Browning AC, Shah S, Hamilton R, Dave D, Dua HS,. Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, goldmann applanation tonometer, and tono-pen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 1389-1392.
32. Rafat M, Li F, Fagerholm P, Lagali NS, Watsky MA, Munger R, Matsuura T, Griffith M,. PEG-stabilized carbodiimide crosslinked collagen-chitosan hydrogels for corneal tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 3960-3972.
33. Andreassen TT, Simonsen AH, Oxlund H,. Biomechanical properties of keratoconus and normal corneas. Exp Eye Res 1980; 31: 435-441.
34. Jue B, Maurice DM,. The mechanical properties of the rabbit and human cornea. J Biomech 1986; 19: 847-853.
35. Kim MK, Lee JL, Wee WR, Lee JH,. Comparative experiments for in vivo fibroplasia and biological stability of four porous polymers intended for use in the Seoul-Type keratoprosthesis. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86: 809-814.
36. Renard G, Cetinel B, Legeais JM, Savoldelli M, Durand J, Pouliquen Y,. Incorporation of a fluorocarbon polymer implanted at the posterior surface of the rabbit cornea. J Biomed Mater Res 1996; 31: 193-199.
37. Temenoff JS, Mikos AG,. Biomaterials the Intersection of Biology and Materials Science. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2008.
38. Walsh JE, Bergmanson JP, Koehler LV, Doughty MJ, Fleming DP, Harmey JH,. Fibre optic spectrophotometry for the in vitro evaluation of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) spectral transmittance of rabbit corneas. Physiol Meas 2008; 29: 375-388.
39. Doutch J, Quantock AJ, Smith VA, Meek KM,. Light transmission in the human cornea as a function of position across the ocular surface: Theoretical and experimental aspects. Biophys J 2008; 95: 5092-5099.
40. Myung D, Duhamel PE, Cochran JR, Noolandi J, Ta CN, Frank CW,. Development of hydrogel-based keratoprothesis: A materials perspective. Biotechnol Prog 2008; 24: 735-741.
41. Campillo-Fernandez AJ, Pastor S, Abad-Collado M, Bataille L, Gomez-Ribelles JL, Meseguer-Duenas JM, Monleon-Padas M, Artola A, Alio JL, Ruiz-Moreno JM,. Future design of a new keratoprosthesis. physical and biological analysis of polymeric substrates for epithelial cell growth. Biomacromolecules 2007; 8: 2429-2436.
42. Campillo-Fernandez AJ, Unger RE, Peters K, Halstenberg S, Santos M, Salmeron Sanchez M, Meseguer Duenas JM, Monleon Pradas M, Gomez Ribelles JL, Kirkpatrick CJ,. Analysis of the biological response of endothelial and fibroblast cells cultured on synthetic scaffolds with various hydrophilic/hydrophobic ratios: influence of fibronectin adsorption and conformation. Tissue Eng Part A 2009; 15: 1331-1341.