Cell viability and inflammatory response in hydrogel sponges implanted in the rabbit cornea

Biomaterials

Volumn 19, Issue 24, 1998, Pages 2255-2267

  Vijayasekaran, S ^a   Fitton, J H ^a   Hicks, C R ^a   Chirila, T V ^a   Crawford, G J ^a   Constable, I J ^a  

^a LIONS EYE INSTITUTE   (Australia)

Author keywords

5 Chloromethylfluorescein diacetate (CMFDA); Enzyme histochemistry; Immunocytochemistry; Keratoprosthesis; Macrophages; Neutrophils; PHEMA

Indexed keywords

ANTIBODIES; BIOASSAY; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; ENZYMES; HYDROGELS; IMMUNOLOGY; LIVING SYSTEMS STUDIES; POLYACRYLATES; PROSTHETICS; TISSUE CULTURE; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

CHLOROMETHYLFLUORESCEIN DIACETATE; ENZYME HISTOCHEMISTRY; IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY; KERATOPROSTHESIS; MACROPHAGES; NEUTROPHILS; POLYHYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE;

IMPLANTS (SURGICAL);

ANTIBODY; CHLOROACETIC ACID; ESTERASE; ETHIDIUM; FLUORESCEIN DIACETATE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CAPILLARY; CELL TYPE; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; ENZYME HISTOCHEMISTRY; EOSINOPHIL; EXPLANT; HYDROGEL; IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY; IMPLANT; INFLAMMATION; INFLAMMATORY CELL; KERATOPROSTHESIS; MACROPHAGE; MYOFIBROBLAST; NEUTROPHIL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; SPONGE; STAINING; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

ANIMALIA; ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS;

EID: 0032401795     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00128-8     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. [1] Crawford GJ, Constable IJ, Chirila TV, Vijayasekaran S, Thompson DE. Tissue interaction with hydrogel sponges implanted in the rabbit cornea. Cornea 1993;12:348-57.
2. [2] Chirila TV, Thompson-Wallis DE, Crawford GJ, Constable IJ, Vijayasekaran S. Production of neocollagen by cells invading hydrogel sponges implanted in the rabbit cornea. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1996;234:193-8.
3. [3] Crawford GJ, Chirila TV, Vijayasekaran S, Dalton PD, Constable IJ. Preliminary evaluation of a hydrogel core-and-skirt keratoprosthesis in the rabbit cornea. J Refract Surg 1996;12: 525-9.
4. [4] Hicks CR, Chirila TV, Dalton PD et al. Keratoprosthesis: preliminary results of an artificial corneal button as a full thickness implant in the rabbit model. Aust NZ J Ophthalmol 1996;24: 297-303.
5. [5] Vijayasekaran S, Hicks CR, Chirila TV et al. Histological evaluation during healing of hydrogel core-and-skirt keratoprosthesis in the rabbit eye. Cornea 1997;16:352-9.
6. [6] Poole CA, Brookes NH, Gilbert RT et al. Detection of viable and non-viable cells in connective tissue implants using the fixable fluoroprobes 5-chloromethylfluorescein diacetate and ethidium homodimer-1. Connect Tiss Res 1996;33:233-41.
7. [7] Haugland RP, MacCoubrey IC, Moore PL. Dual-fluorescence cell viability assay using ethidium homodimer and calcein AM. US Patent 05314805, 1994.
8. [8] Knorr M, Hahn B, Wunderlich K, Hoppe J, Steuhl KP. PDGF-induced effect on cytosolic free calcium concentration of cultured retinal pericytes. Ophthalmologe 1995;92:692-7.
9. [9] Poole CA, Brookes NH, Clover GM. Keratoctye networks visualised in the living cornea using vital dyes. J Cell Sci 1993;106: 685-91.
10. [10] Eddleman CS, Godell CM, Fishman HM, Tytell M, Bittner GD. Fluorescent labeling of the glial sheath of giant nerve fibers. Biol Bull 1995;189:218-9.
11. [11] Poot M, Cavanagh TJ, Kang HC, Haugland RP, Rabinovitch PS. Flow cytometric analysis of cell cycle-dependent changes in cell thiol level by combining a new laser dye with Hoechst 33 342. Cytometry 1991;12:184-7.
12. [12] Haugland RP. Handbook of fluorescent probes and research chemicals. Eugene, OR: Molecular Probes Inc., 1996.
13. [13] Hunt JA, Remes A, Williams DF. The effect of metal ions on neutrophil degranulation. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1992;3: 160-9.
14. [14] Hunt JA, Ungersbock A, Perrin P, Williams DF. The effect of titanium debris on the soft tissue response. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1994;5:381-3.
15. [15] Panagakos FS, Kumar S. Modulation of proteases and their inhibitors in immortal human osteoblast-like cells by tumor necrosis factor α in vitro. Inflammation 1994;18: 243-65.
16. [16] Bainton DF. The cells of inflammation: a general view. In: Weissmann G, editor. The cell biology of inflammation. Handbook of inflammation - 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1980:1-24.
17. [17] Tabata Y, Ikada, Y. Phagocytosis of polymer microspheres by macrophages. In: New polymer materials. Advances in polymers science series 94. Berlin: Springer, 1990:107-41.
18. [18] Chirila TV, Constable IJ, Crawford GJ, Russo AV. Keratoprosthesis and method of producing the same. Australian Patent 650,156, 1994.
19. [19] Chirila TV, Constable IJ, Crawford GJ, Russo AV. Keratoprosthesis and method of producing a keratoprosthesis. US Patent 5,458,819, 1995.
20. [20] Chirila TV, Vijayasekaran S, Horne R et al. Interpenetrating polymer network (IPN) as a permanent joint between elements of a new type of artificial cornea. J Biomed Mater Res 1994;28: 745-53.
21. [21] Maurice DM. The biology of wound healing in the corneal stroma. Cornea 1987;6:162-8.
22. [22] Gasset AR, Dohlman CH. The tensile strength of corneal wounds. Arch Ophthalmol 1968;79:595-602.
23. [23] Weimar V. Activation of corneal stromal cells to take up the vital dye nuetral red. Exp Cell Res 1959;18:1-14.
24. [24] Robb RM, Kuwabara T. Corneal wound healing. Arch Ophthalmol 1962;68:636-42.
25. [25] Amudeswari S, Nagarajan B, Reddy CR, Joseph T. Short-term biocompatibility studies of hydrogel-grafted collagen copolymers. J Biomed Mater Res 1986;20:1103-9.
26. [26] Brown SI, Dohlman CH. A buried corneal implant serving as a barrier to fluid. Arch Ophthalmol 1965;73:635-9.
27. [27] Nathan CF, Brukner LH, Silverstein SC, Cohn ZA. Extracellular cytolysis by activated macrophages and granulocytes. I. Pharmacologic triggering of effector cells and the release of hydrogen peroxide. J Exp Med 1979;149:84-99.
28. [28] Starkey PM, Barret AJ, Burleigh MC. The degradation of articular collagen by neutrophil proteinases. Biochim Biophys Acta 1977;483:386-97.
29. [29] Klebanoff SJ, Clark RA. The neutrophil: function and clinical disorders. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1978:226-38.
30. [30] Vince DG, Hunt JA, Williams DF. Quantitative assessment of the tissue response to implanted biomaterials. Biomaterials 1991; 12:731-6.
31. [31] Gabbiani G, Hirschel BJ, Statkov PR, Majno G. Granulation tissue as a contractile organ. A study of structure and function. J Exp Med 1972;135:719-34.
32. [32] Ryan GB, Cliff WJ, Gabbiani G, Irle C, Montandon D, Statkov PR, Majno G. Myofibroblasts in human granulation tissue. Human Pathol 1974;5:55-67.
33. [33] Gabbiani G, Rungger-Brandle E. The fibroblast. In: Glynn LE, editor. Tissue repair and regeneration. Handbook of inflammation - 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1981:1-49.