MR elastography derived shear stiffness - A new imaging biomarker for the assessment of early tumor response to chemotherapy

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 71, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1834-1840

  Pepin, Kay M ^a   Chen, Jun ^a   Glaser, Kevin J ^a   Mariappan, Yogesh K ^a   Reuland, Brian ^a   Ziesmer, Steven ^a   Carter, Rickey ^a   Ansell, Stephen M ^a   Ehman, Richard L ^a   McGee, Kiaran P ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

cancer stiffness; chemotherapy response; individualized medicine; MR elastography

Indexed keywords

BIOMARKERS; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; MAGNETISM; MAMMALS; MEDICAL IMAGING; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; STIFFNESS; TUMORS;

CELLULAR PROLIFERATIONS; CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC AGENTS; CHEMOTHERAPY RESPONSE; CHEMOTHERAPY TREATMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ELASTOGRAPHY; MR ELASTOGRAPHY; NON-HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA; NORMAL-TISSUE TOXICITY;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER GROWTH; CANCER THERAPY; CELL PROLIFERATION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOTOXICITY; EARLY CANCER; ELASTOGRAPHY; HISTOLOGY; IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ELASTOGRAPHY; MALE; MOUSE; NONHODGKIN LYMPHOMA; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; RIGIDITY; TREATMENT RESPONSE; TUMOR XENOGRAFT; ANIMAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; LYMPHOMA, NON-HODGKIN; MECHANICAL STRESS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCID MOUSE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHEAR STRENGTH; TRANSGENIC MOUSE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR CELL LINE; YOUNG MODULUS;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CELL LINE, TUMOR; ELASTIC MODULUS; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LYMPHOMA, NON-HODGKIN; MALE; MICE; MICE, SCID; MICE, TRANSGENIC; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHEAR STRENGTH; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84899440757     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24825     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Meyer CR, Armato SG, Fenimore CP, et al. Quantitative imaging to assess tumor response to therapy: common themes of measurement, truth data, and error sources. Transl Oncol 2009; 2: 198-210.
2. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 205-216.
3. Suresh S,. Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells. Acta Biomater 2007; 3: 413-438.
4. Cross SE, Jin YS, Rao J, Gimzewski JK,. Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients. Nat Nanotechnol 2007; 2: 780-783.
5. Lekka M, Laidler P, Gil D, Lekki J, Stachura Z, Hrynkiewicz AZ,. Elasticity of normal and cancerous human bladder cells studied by scanning force microscopy. Eur Biophys J 1999; 28: 312-316.
6. Rosenbluth MJ, Lam WA, Fletcher DA,. Force microscopy of nonadherent cells: a comparison of leukemia cell deformability. Biophys J 2006; 90: 2994-3003.
7. Guck J, Schinkinger S, Lincoln B, et al. Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence. Biophys J 2005; 88: 3689-3698.
8. Lam WA, Rosenbluth MJ, Fletcher DA,. Chemotherapy exposure increases leukemia cell stiffness. Blood 2007; 109: 3505-3508.
9. Sack I, Beierbach B, Hamhaber U, Klatt D, Braun J,. Non-invasive measurement of brain viscoelasticity using magnetic resonance elastography. NMR Biomed 2008; 21: 265-271.
10. Yin M, Talwalkar JA, Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Grimm RC, Rossman PJ, Fidler JL, Ehman RL,. Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 1207-1213 e1202.
11. Muthupillai R, Lomas DJ, Rossman PJ, Greenleaf JF, Manduca A, Ehman RL,. Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. Science 1995; 269: 1854-1857.
12. Sinkus R, Siegmann K, Xydeas T, Tanter M, Claussen C, Fink M,. MR elastography of breast lesions: understanding the solid/liquid duality can improve the specificity of contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58: 1135-1144.
13. Murphy MC, Huston J, 3rd, Jack CR, Jr, Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Felmlee JP, Ehman RL,. Decreased brain stiffness in Alzheimer's disease determined by magnetic resonance elastography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 34: 494-498.
14. Venkatesh SK, Yin M, Glockner JF, Takahashi N, Araoz PA, Talwalkar JA, Ehman RL,. MR elastography of liver tumors: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190: 1534-1540.
15. Garteiser P, Doblas S, Daire JL, Wagner M, Leitao H, Vilgrain V, Sinkus R, Van Beers BE,. MR elastography of liver tumours: value of viscoelastic properties for tumour characterisation. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 2169-2177.
16. Ansell SM, Arendt BK, Grote DM, Jelinek DF, Novak AJ, Wellik LE, Remstein ED, Bennett CF, Fielding A,. Inhibition of survivin expression suppresses the growth of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Leukemia 2004; 18: 616-623.
17. Kruse SA, Grimm RC, Lake DS, Manduca A, Ehman RL,. Fast EPI Based MR Elastography of the Brain. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Seattle, Washington, USA, 2006. p. 3385.
18. Yin M, Grimm RC, Manduca A, Ehman RL,. Rapid EPI-based MR elastography of the liver. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Seattle, Washington, USA, 2006. p. 2268.
19. Herzka DA, Kotys MS, Sinkus R, Pettigrew RI, Gharib AM,. Magnetic resonance elastography in the liver at 3 Tesla using a second harmonic approach. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62: 284-291.
20. Nedredal GI, Yin M, McKenzie T, Lillegard J, Luebke-Wheeler J, Talwalkar J, Ehman R, Nyberg SL,. Portal hypertension correlates with splenic stiffness as measured with MR elastography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 34: 79-87.
21. Manduca A, Lake DS, Kruse SA, Ehman RL,. Spatio-temporal directional filtering for improved inversion of MR elastography images. Med Image Anal 2003; 7: 465-473.
22. Manduca A, Oliphant TE, Dresner MA, Mahowald JL, Kruse SA, Amromin E, Felmlee JP, Greenleaf JF, Ehman RL,. Magnetic resonance elastography: non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity. Med Image Anal 2001; 5: 237-254.
23. Chen J, McGee KP, Mariappan YK, Glaser KJ, Ansell SM, Pelletier KM, Grote DM, Ehman, RL,. Assessment of early tumor response to chemotherapy using MR elastography (MRE). In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Montreal, Canada, 2011. p. 6187.
24. Vappou J, Breton E, Choquet P, Willinger R, Constantinesco A,. Assessment of in vivo and post-mortem mechanical behavior of brain tissue using magnetic resonance elastography. J Biomech 2008; 41: 2954-2959.
25. Ehman EC, Rossman PJ, Kruse SA, Sahakian AV, Glaser KJ,. Vibration safety limits for magnetic resonance elastography. Phys Med Biol 2008; 53: 925-935.